(Sports Club of Madras Ltd. v. CIT

196 ITR 137High Court1992#11259 most cited
9

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2025.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing (Sports Club of Madras Ltd. v. CIT

M/S FEDERATION OF FREIGHT FORWARDERS ASSOCIATIONS IN INDIA,MUMBAI vs. ITO 1(3), MUMBAI

In the result, ground no.1 of the assessee is allowed and additions amounting to Rs

ITA 710/MUM/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 Jul 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri Gagan Goyalm/S Federation Of Freight Forwarders Associations, 311/313, Mahinder Chambers, W.T. Patil Marg, Opp. Dukes Factory, Chembur, Mumbai-400071 Pan: Aaatf0039J ...... Appellant Vs. Ito (Exemption)-1(3), Piramal Chambers 4Th Floor, Dr. S.S. Road, Parel, Mumbai-400012. ..... Respondent Appellant By : Sh. Nitesh Joshi Respondent By : Sh. Indira Adakil, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 13/04/2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 07/07/2022 Order Per Gagan Goyal, A.M:

For Appellant: Sh. Nitesh JoshiFor Respondent: Sh. Indira Adakil, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 142(1)Section 2Section 2(15)

…om the accounts or at any rate by estimate if it should become necessary (CIT v/s Madras Race Club 105 ITR 433 Madras) and the profits derived from non-members can be brought to tax (Sports Club of Madras Ltd. v/s CIT 171 ITR 504). iv. CIT v/s Ranchi Club Ltd 196 ITR 137 (Patna Full Bench), Spl Leave petition granted by the Supreme Court 194 ITR (ST) 236 (SC). The surplus receipts of members over its expenses have been sought to be exempted from Income tax on the principle of Mutuality. This principle is based on the premise that no man can make profit out of himself, but this principle cannot have any applicatio…

ALL INDIA LIQUID BULK IMPOERTERS & EXPORTERS ASSSOCIATION,MUMBAI vs. ADIT(E)-II(2), MUMBAI, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1604/MUM/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleall India Liquid Bulk Vs. Adit(E)-Ii(2) Importers & Exporters Piramal Chambers, Association Lalbaug, Parel, 501- Mulratna, Mumbai – 400012. 334- Katha Bazar, Masjid, Mumbai – 400009. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aagca5018F Appellant .. Respondent Appellant By : Mr.Paresh Shaparia.C.A. Ar Respondent By : Mr.Kailash Mangal.Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing 08.02.2022 Date Of Pronouncement 14.02.2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale Jm: The Assessee Has Filed The Appeal Against The Order Of The Cit(A)-3, Mumbai Passed U/S 143(3) & 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961.The Assessee Has Raised The Fallowing Grounds Of Appeal: I. Confirmation Of Treatment Of The Non-Profit Organisation As A Mutual Concern & Denying Exemption U/S 11: 1. The Learned C1.T(A) Erred In Confirming Treatment Of The All Inida Liquid Bulk Importers & Exporters Association, Mumbai. Appellant As A Mutual Association Created Exclusively For The Benefit Of Its Members. 2. The Learned Cit(A) Failed To Appreciate The Fact That The Basic Conditions Of The Concept Of Mutuality Are Not Satisfied, Hence The Same Is Not Applicable To The Appellant.

For Appellant: Mr.Paresh Shaparia.C.A. ARFor Respondent: Mr.Kailash Mangal.Sr.DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 25

…the accounts or at any rate by estimate if it should become necessary (CIT Vs madras Race Race Club 105 ITR 433 Madras) and the profits derived from non members can be brought to tax (Sports Club of Madras Ltd. v./ s CIT 171 rat 504). CIT Vs. Ranchi Club Ltd 196 ITR 137 (Patna Full Bench), Spl Vi. Leave pdration granted by the Supreme Court 194 ITR (ST) 236 (SC). The s---rplus receipts of members over its expenses have been sought to be from Income tax on the principle of Mutuality. This principle is based on the premise that no men can make profit out of himself, but this principle cannot have any application i…

SOCIAL CLUB AND KREEDA BHAVAN,BELGAVI vs. ITO, WARD - 2(1), BELGAVI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 385/PAN/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji07 Oct 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar, Jm & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Am Social Club & Kreeda Bhavan, Vs Ito, Ward-2(1), Belagavi College Road, Belagavi-590002 Pan No.Aacas 6996 A (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. यनधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri B.B.Chandargi, Ca राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Sourabh Nayak, Sr.Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 07/10/2021 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 07/10/2021 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : This An Appeal Filed By The Revenue Against The Order Passed By The Cit(A), Gulbarga, Dated 19.10.2017 For The Assessment Year 2013- 2013, On The Following Grounds :- 1. The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Belgaum Has Erred In Upholding The Order Assessing Officer Disallowing Expenses Under The Head Business Or Profession Even Though Income Is Exempted As Mutual Concern By The Assessing Officer. This Is Opposed To Law & Facts Of The Case.

For Appellant: Shri B.B.Chandargi, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sourabh Nayak, Sr.DR
Section 40Section 40aSection 43BSection 56

…and a mutual concern which is accepted by the Department. He also submitted that this matter is also upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme court in the case of Bankipr Club Ltd civil Appeal Nos.854-858 ofl994 dated 08/05/1997 as well as in CIT Vs.Ranci Club Ltd(1992) 196 ITR 137.Amount received from members is claimed as exempt on the principle of mutuality and any income which is received other than members is offered for taxation under the head Income from other sources (Section 56) and Tax is paid on the same. It was further submitted by the ld. AR that the Assessing officer has assessed the income under the head Inco…

(Sports Club of Madras Ltd. v. CIT (196 ITR 137) — Cited in 9 Judgments | BharatTax