Society for The Promotion of Education v. CIT

372 ITR 222High Court2015#11624 most cited
9

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2025.

Judgments citing Society for The Promotion of Education v. CIT

INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTIONS), RAJAHMUNDRY vs. RURAL INDIA SELF DEVELOPMENT TRUST,, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue and the Cross

ITA 378/VIZ/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam04 Oct 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Bleito (Exemptions), Vs. M/S. Rural India Self Rajahmundry. Development Trust, D.No. 90-1-5/1, Swaraj Nagar, Alcot Gardens, Rajahmundry. Pan No. Aaatr 3046 F (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O.No.117/Viz/2018 (Arising Out Of Ita No. 378/Viz/2018) (Asst. Year : 2013-14) M/S. Rural India Self Vs. Ito (Exemptions), Development Trust, Rajahmundry. D.No. 90-1-5/1, Swaraj Nagar, Alcot Gardens, Rajahmundry. Pan No. Aaatr 3046 F (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri C. Subrahmanyam, Fca. Department By : Shri T.S.N. Murthy, Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing : 25/09/2019. Date Of Pronouncement : 04/10/2019. O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao

For Appellant: Shri C. Subrahmanyam, FCAFor Respondent: Shri T.S.N. Murthy, Sr.DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(1)

…ore the expiry of six months otherwise it is deemed registration. For this he relied on the judgment of the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the case of Society for the Promotion of Education Adventure Sport & Conservation of Environment Vs. CIT & Ors. [(2015) 372 ITR 222 (All.)] and also the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Society for the Promotion of Education (supra). 6. On the other hand, ld.DR strongly supported the order of the Assessing Officer. 7. We have heard both the sides, perused the material available on record and orders of the authorities below. 8. The assessee is a trust applied…

SEVEN ELEVEN EDUCATION SOCIETY,THANE vs. ASST CIT 2, THANE

ITA 1111/MUM/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai02 May 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Rajendra & Ram Lal Negi

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay ParikhFor Respondent: Shri V. Justin -DR
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 254(1)

…आयकर अपीलीय अपीलीय अिधकरण अिधकरण, मुंबई मुंबई “ई” खंडपीठ खंडपीठ आयकर आयकर आयकर अपीलीय अपीलीय अिधकरण अिधकरण मुंबई मुंबई खंडपीठ खंडपीठ Income-tax Appellate Tribunal -“E”Bench Mumbai सव"ी सव"ी राजे"" राजे"",लेखा लेखा सद"य सद"य एवं एवं, राम राम लाल लाल नेगी नेगी, "याियक "याियक सद"य सद"य सव"ी सव"ी राजे"" राजे"" लेखा लेखा सद"य सद"य एवं एवं राम राम लाल लाल नेगी नेगी "याियक "याियक सद"य सद"य Before S/Shri Rajendra,Accountant Member and Ram Lal Negi,Judicial Member आयकर अपील अपील संसंसंसं./I.T.A./1111/Mum/2016,िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" /Assessment Year: 2011-12 आयकर आयकर आयकर अपील अपील िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" आयकर अपील…

Society for The Promotion of Education v. CIT (372 ITR 222) — Cited in 9 Judgments | BharatTax