Snowtex Investment Limited v. PCIT

414 ITR 227Supreme Court of India2019#7143 most cited
16

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2025.

Also reported as

105 Taxmann.com 282

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Snowtex Investment Limited v. PCIT

AMOL CAPITAL MARKETS PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ITO 4(1)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 783/MUM/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Aug 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Amarjit Singhamol Capital Markets Vs. Ito 4(1)(1) Private Limited Room No. 636, Aayakar A-106, Motalibai Wadia Bhavan, M.K. Road, Bldg, 22-D Sa Brelvi Mumbai - 400020 Street, Road, Fort, Mumbai – 400001 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No: Aadcs8022N Appellant .. Respondent [ Appellant By : Rahul Hakani Respondent By : Manoj Kumar Sinha Date Of Hearing 03.08.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 18.08.2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amarjit Singh (Am): The Solitary Ground Of Appeal Of The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld. Cit(A) In Confirming The Action Of Assessing Officer Of Denying Set Off Of Profit Of F. & O. Transactions & Profit Of Non-Delivery Based Share Against Brought Forward Business Loss. 2. Fact In Brief Is That Return Of Income Declaring Income At Rs.Nil Was Filed On 25.09.2014. The Assessment U/S 143(3) Of The Act Was Completed On 15.12.2016. The Assessing Officer Has Treated The Brought Forward Loss On The Trading Of F & O As Speculative Loss By Invoking Explanation To Sec. 73 Of The Act & Has Not Allowed The Same To Be Set

For Appellant: Rahul HakaniFor Respondent: Manoj Kumar Sinha
Section 143(3)Section 43Section 43(5)Section 73

…P a g e | 1 Amol Capital Markets Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO 4(1)(1) IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI ABY T VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Amol Capital Markets Vs. ITO 4(1)(1) Private Limited Room No. 636, Aayakar A-106, Motalibai Wadia Bhavan, M.K. Road, Bldg, 22-D SA Brelvi Mumbai - 400020 Street, Road, Fort, Mumbai – 400001 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No: AADCS8022N Appellant .. Respondent [ Appellant by : Rahul Hakani Respondent by : Manoj Kumar Sinha Date of Hearing 03.08.2023 Date of Pronouncement 18.08.2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amarjit Sin…

HINDUJA FINANCE LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DCIT , RANGE -7(1)(2) (EARLIER DCIT 6(1)), MUMBAI

In the result, this ground of appeal of assessee is dismissed and order of Ld

ITA 7154/MUM/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 May 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Gagan Goyalhinduja Finance Ltd. 171, Hinduja House, Dr. Annie Besant Road, Worli, Mumbai-400018 Pan: Aagca0533R ...... Appellant Vs. Dy.Cit, Range-7(1)(2) Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road, Mumbai-400020. ..... Respondent Appellant By : Sh. Ruturaj Gurjar Respondent By : Sh. B.K. Bagchi, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 25/03/2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 20/05/2022 Order Per Gagan Goyal, A.M: This Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-13, Mumbai [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Cit (A)’] Vide Order Dated 05.09.2019 For The Assessment Year (Ay) 2010- 11. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal: 1. On The Facts & The Circumstances Of The Case & In Law, The Cit(A) Has Erred In Confirming: I) The Disallowance Made U/S.14A Of The Income Tax Act At Rs.7, 06,985/- As Against Disallowance Of Rs.2, 52,536/- As Computed By The Appellant. The Disallowance Made Of Rs.4, 54,449/- May Please Be Deleted.

For Appellant: Sh. Ruturaj GurjarFor Respondent: Sh. B.K. Bagchi, CIT-DR
Section 14Section 14A

…of being set off against the profits which it had earned against the business of futures and options/trading in shares with delivery, since the latter did not constitute profits and gains of a speculative business. [Re: Snowtex Investment Ltd. vs. PCIT [2019] 414 ITR 227 (SC)]. 16. In the result, this ground of appeal of assessee is dismissed and order of Ld. CIT (A) is confirmed. 17. In the result appeal of assessee is partly allowed. Order pronounced in the open court on 20th day of May, 2022. (VIKAS AWASTHY) (GAGAN GOYAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Mumbai, िदनांक/Dated: 20/05/2022 SK, Sr.PS 13 ITA…

Snowtex Investment Limited v. PCIT (414 ITR 227) — Cited in 16 Judgments | BharatTax