Sky Light Hospitality LLP v. ACIT

90 Taxmann.com 413High Court2018#5996 most cited
20

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2026.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Sky Light Hospitality LLP v. ACIT

VIKAS JAIN,KANPUR vs. ACIT-CC 2(1)(1), KANPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 434/LKW/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow31 Dec 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Sh. Kul Bharat & Sh. Nikhil Choudharya.Y. 2015-16 Vikas Jain, Vs. The Acit, H-2/1, Kidwai Nagar, Kanpur- Circle 2(1)(1), Kanpur 208001 208006 Pan: Abqpj8049R (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Sh. Rakesh Garg, Adv Revenue By: Sh. Amit Kumar, Dr Date Of Hearing: 07.10.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 31.12.2025 O R D E R Per Nikhil Choudhary, A.M.: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Orders Of The Ld. Cit(A), Nfac On 17.05.2024 Wherein The Ld. Cit(A) Has Dismissed The Appeal Of The Assessee Against The Order Passed By The Ld. Assessing Officer Under Section 147 R.W.S. 143(3) For The A.Y. 2015-16 On 27.12.2018. The Grounds Of Appeal Are As Under:- “01. Because There Being No Reason To Believe, Far From There Being Any Material To Form Reasons To Believe, The Proceedings Initiated Right From Issue Of Notice U/S. 148 & The Re-Assessment Framed Thereof Are All Without Jurisdiction Bad In Law, The Order Passed Be Quashed. 02. Because The So-Called Reasons Having Been Recorded Applying Explanation 2(A) To Section 147, Of The Act Which Not Being Applicable, The Very Reason To Believe Being Contrary To The Mandate Of The Section, The Proceedings- Initiated U/S 148, The Reassessment Framed Are All Contrary To The Provisions Of Law, Be Quashed. 03. Because The Approval Given By The Competent Authority U/S 151, Being Mechanical In Nature Without Verification Of Facts, The Notice Issued U/S 148 & The Reassessment Framed Thereafter Be Quashed.

For Appellant: Sh. Rakesh Garg, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Amit Kumar, DR
Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 156Section 48Section 50C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW ‘A’ BENCH, LUCKNOW BEFORE SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER A.Y. 2015-16 Vikas jain, vs. The ACIT, H-2/1, Kidwai Nagar, Kanpur- Circle 2(1)(1), Kanpur 208001 208006 PAN: ABQPJ8049R (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Sh. Rakesh Garg, Adv Revenue by: Sh. Amit Kumar, DR Date of hearing: 07.10.2025 Date of pronouncement: 31.12.2025 O R D E R PER NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, A.M.: This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the orders of the ld. CIT(A), NFAC on 17.05.2024 wherein the ld. CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal of the assess…

PPG COATING INDIA P. LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CIR 13(1)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2168/MUM/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Jun 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Amarjit Singh, Am आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. (Tp) No.2168/Mum/2017 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2012-13) Ppg Coatings India Pvt. बिधम/ Dcit, Circle-13(1)(1) Ltd. Mumbai Vs. (Now Merged With Ppg Asian Paints Pvt. Ltd.) The Centrium Phoenix Market City, Lbs, Marg, Kurla West, Mumbai- 400070. स्थधयी लेखध सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aabcs4378K (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) Assessee By: Shri Percy Pardiwala Revenue By: Shri Samuel Pitta (Sr. Ar) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 02/05/2023 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 16/06/2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Aby T. Varkey, Jm: This Is An Appeal Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Assessing Officer Dated 25.01.2017 Pursuant To Dispute Resolution Panel (Drp)-02, Mumbai Passed 27.12.2016 Passed U/S 143(3) R.W.S. 144C(13) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter “The Act”). 2. At The Outset, The Ld. Senior Counsel For The Assessee Drew Our Attention To The Additional Grounds Of Appeal Raised By The Assessee, Which According To Him Is A Legal Issue & Which Need To Be Adjudicated First, Since If The Legal Issue Is Upheld Then, It Goes To The Root Of The Jurisdiction Of The Ao To Have Passed The Final Assessment Order. The Legal Issue Raised By Assessee Reads As Under;-

For Appellant: Shri Percy PardiwalaFor Respondent: Shri Samuel Pitta (Sr. AR)
Section 143(3)Section 92C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “J” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JM AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, AM आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. (TP) No.2168/Mum/2017 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2012-13) PPG Coatings India Pvt. बिधम/ DCIT, Circle-13(1)(1) Ltd. Mumbai Vs. (now merged with PPG Asian Paints Pvt. Ltd.) The Centrium Phoenix Market City, LBS, Marg, Kurla West, Mumbai- 400070. स्थधयी लेखध सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : AABCS4378K (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) Assessee by: Shri Percy Pardiwala Revenue by: Shri Samuel Pitta (Sr. AR) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing: 02/05/2023 घोषणा की त…

ACIT- CC- 3(3), CR- 3, MUMB vs. M/S. CANDOR RENEWABLE ENERGY PVT. LTD.(ERSTWHILE 'BHADRAWATI ISPAT & ENERGY LTD'.), MUMBAI

ITA 2561/MUM/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai19 Oct 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla, Jm & Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am 1. आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No. 2561/Mum/2021 (ननधधारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2013-14) & 2. आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No. 2560/Mum/2021 (ननधधारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2014-15) Asst. Commissioner Of M/S Candor Renewable Energy Pvt. Ltd. Inocome Tax-Cc-3(3), (Erstwhile Bhadrawati Central Range-3, बनाम/ Ispat & Energy Ltd) R. No. 1923, 19Th Floor, Air Vs. 404, 4Th Floor, Hub Town India Building, Nariman Solaris, N. S. Phadke Point, Mumbai-400021 Marg, Mumbai-400 069 स्थधयीलेखधसं./जीआइआरसं./ Pan No. Aadcr1238F (अपीलधथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) : 3. आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No. 697/Mum/2022 (ननधधारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2013-14) & 4. आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No. 698/Mum/2022 (ननधधारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2014-15) Dy. Commissioner Of M/S Candor Renewable Energy Pvt. Ltd. (Erstwhile Income Tax-Cc-3(3), Bhadrawati Ispat & Energy Central Range-3, बनाम/ Ltd) R. No. 1923, 19Th Floor, Vs. 404, 4Th Floor, Hub Town Air India Building, Solaris, N. S. Phadke Marg, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400 069 Mumbai-400021 (अपीलधथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) :

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay V. DeshmukhFor Respondent: Shri Mani Jain & Prateek
Section 153ASection 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JM, & SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, AM 1. आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No. 2561/Mum/2021 (ननधधारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2013-14) And 2. आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No. 2560/Mum/2021 (ननधधारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2014-15) Asst. Commissioner of M/s Candor Renewable Energy Pvt. Ltd. Inocome Tax-CC-3(3), (Erstwhile Bhadrawati Central Range-3, बनाम/ Ispat & Energy Ltd) R. No. 1923, 19th Floor, Air Vs. 404, 4th floor, Hub Town India Building, Nariman Solaris, N. S. phadke Point, Mumbai-400021 Marg, Mumbai-400 069 स्थधयीलेखधसं./जीआइआरसं./ PAN No. AADCR1238F (अ…

M/S. INFOSYS BPM LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS INFOSYS BPO LIMITED, SUCCESSOR TO PAN FINANCIAL SHARED SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED),BANGALORE vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SPECIAL RANGE- 3, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 2372/BANG/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore16 Sept 2021AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Chandra Poojariassessment Year : 2008-09 M/S. Infosys Bpm Limited Vs. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, (Formerly Known As Infosys Bpo Limited, Special Range – 3, Successor To Pan Financial Shared Services Bengaluru. India Private Limited), 26/3, 26/4, 26/6, Electronic City, Hosur Road, Bengaluru – 560 100. Pan : Aaccp 4478 N Appellant Respondent Appellant By : Shri. Padam Chand Khincha, Ca Respondent By : Shri. Muzaffar Hussain, Cit(Dr)(Itat), Bengaluru Date Of Hearing : 14.09.2021 Date Of Pronouncement : 16.09.2021 O R D E R Per N. V. Vasudevan: This Is An Appeal By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 29.09.2019 Of Cit(A)-3, Bengaluru, Relating To Ay 2008-09. 2. Grounds 2 & 3 Raised By The Assessee Is With Regard The Validity Of The Order Passed By The Ao On The Ground That The Assessee Ceased To Exist As On The Date On Which The Order Of The Assessment Was Passed On Merger With M/S. Infosys Bpm Ltd. & Consequently The Order Passed In The Name Of A Company Which Seized To Exist Was Invalid. These Grounds Reads As Follows:

For Appellant: Shri. Padam Chand Khincha, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Muzaffar Hussain, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 391

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI N.V. VASUDEVAN, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year : 2008-09 M/s. Infosys BPM Limited Vs. The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, (formerly known as Infosys BPO Limited, Special Range – 3, Successor to PAN Financial Shared Services Bengaluru. India Private Limited), 26/3, 26/4, 26/6, Electronic City, Hosur Road, Bengaluru – 560 100. PAN : AACCP 4478 N APPELLANT RESPONDENT Appellant by : Shri. Padam Chand Khincha, CA Respondent by : Shri. Muzaffar Hussain, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru Date of hearing : 14.09.20…

ASST CIT 8(2)(1), MUMBAI vs. SIEMENS INFORMATION PROCESSING SERVICES P.LTD, MUMBAI

ITA 1779/MUM/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Jul 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad, Hon'Ble & Shri N.K. Pradhan, Hon'Blem/S. Siemens Technology & Services Pvt. Ltd., V. Deputy Commissioner Of {Successor To Siemens Information Income Tax - 7(2) Processing Services Pvt. Ltd.,} Room No. 624, 6Th Floor 130, Pandurang Budhkar Marg Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road Worli, Mumbai – 400 018 Mumbai-400 020 (Appellant) (Respondent) Dy. Commissioner Of V. M/S. Siemens Information Processing Services Pvt. Ltd., Income Tax - 7(2) {Successor Of Siemens Technology & Services Pvt. Ltd.,} 130, Pandurang Budhkar Marg Room No. 624, Worli, Mumbai – 400 018 6Th Floor Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road Mumbai-400 020 (Appellant) (Respondent) M/S. Siemens Technology & Services Pvt. Ltd., V. Asst. Commissioner Of {Successor To Siemens Information Processing Income Tax, Services Pvt. Ltd.,} Circle - 8(2)(1) 130, Pandurang Budhkar Marg Room No. 624, 6Th Floor Worli, Mumbai – 400 018 Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road Mumbai-400 020 (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh JoshiFor Respondent: Shri Debashis Chanda
Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 144C(5)

…l be assessed in respect of the income of the previous year in which succession took place, up to the date of succession”. Ld. DR placed reliance in the case of Sky Light Hospitality LLP v. ACIT [92 taxmann.com 93 (SC)], CIT v. Shaw Wallace Distilleries Ltd. [386 ITR 14 (Calcutta)] and The Himalayan Drug Co. v. DCIT in IT(TP)A No. 807/Bang/2016 dated 21.06.2017. 10. We have heard the rival submissions, perused the orders of the authorities below. It is not in dispute that SIPSPL has been amalgamated with STSPL by virtue of an order pursuant to scheme of amalgamation by the Hon'ble Bombay High Court passed on 26.0…

SIEMENS TECHNOLOGY AND SERVICES PRIVATE LTD. (SUCCESSOR TO SIEMNENS INFORMATION PROCESSING SERVICES PVT. LTD.),MUMBAI vs. ACIT, CIR -8(2)(1), MUMBAI

ITA 1665/MUM/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Jul 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad, Hon'Ble & Shri N.K. Pradhan, Hon'Blem/S. Siemens Technology & Services Pvt. Ltd., V. Deputy Commissioner Of {Successor To Siemens Information Income Tax - 7(2) Processing Services Pvt. Ltd.,} Room No. 624, 6Th Floor 130, Pandurang Budhkar Marg Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road Worli, Mumbai – 400 018 Mumbai-400 020 (Appellant) (Respondent) Dy. Commissioner Of V. M/S. Siemens Information Processing Services Pvt. Ltd., Income Tax - 7(2) {Successor Of Siemens Technology & Services Pvt. Ltd.,} 130, Pandurang Budhkar Marg Room No. 624, Worli, Mumbai – 400 018 6Th Floor Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road Mumbai-400 020 (Appellant) (Respondent) M/S. Siemens Technology & Services Pvt. Ltd., V. Asst. Commissioner Of {Successor To Siemens Information Processing Income Tax, Services Pvt. Ltd.,} Circle - 8(2)(1) 130, Pandurang Budhkar Marg Room No. 624, 6Th Floor Worli, Mumbai – 400 018 Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road Mumbai-400 020 (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh JoshiFor Respondent: Shri Debashis Chanda
Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 144C(5)

…l be assessed in respect of the income of the previous year in which succession took place, up to the date of succession”. Ld. DR placed reliance in the case of Sky Light Hospitality LLP v. ACIT [92 taxmann.com 93 (SC)], CIT v. Shaw Wallace Distilleries Ltd. [386 ITR 14 (Calcutta)] and The Himalayan Drug Co. v. DCIT in IT(TP)A No. 807/Bang/2016 dated 21.06.2017. 10. We have heard the rival submissions, perused the orders of the authorities below. It is not in dispute that SIPSPL has been amalgamated with STSPL by virtue of an order pursuant to scheme of amalgamation by the Hon'ble Bombay High Court passed on 26.0…

DCIT 7(2), MUMBAI vs. SIEMENS INFORMATION PROCESSING SERVICES P.LTD, MUMBAI

ITA 1887/MUM/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Jul 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad, Hon'Ble & Shri N.K. Pradhan, Hon'Blem/S. Siemens Technology & Services Pvt. Ltd., V. Deputy Commissioner Of {Successor To Siemens Information Income Tax - 7(2) Processing Services Pvt. Ltd.,} Room No. 624, 6Th Floor 130, Pandurang Budhkar Marg Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road Worli, Mumbai – 400 018 Mumbai-400 020 (Appellant) (Respondent) Dy. Commissioner Of V. M/S. Siemens Information Processing Services Pvt. Ltd., Income Tax - 7(2) {Successor Of Siemens Technology & Services Pvt. Ltd.,} 130, Pandurang Budhkar Marg Room No. 624, Worli, Mumbai – 400 018 6Th Floor Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road Mumbai-400 020 (Appellant) (Respondent) M/S. Siemens Technology & Services Pvt. Ltd., V. Asst. Commissioner Of {Successor To Siemens Information Processing Income Tax, Services Pvt. Ltd.,} Circle - 8(2)(1) 130, Pandurang Budhkar Marg Room No. 624, 6Th Floor Worli, Mumbai – 400 018 Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road Mumbai-400 020 (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh JoshiFor Respondent: Shri Debashis Chanda
Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 144C(5)

…l be assessed in respect of the income of the previous year in which succession took place, up to the date of succession”. Ld. DR placed reliance in the case of Sky Light Hospitality LLP v. ACIT [92 taxmann.com 93 (SC)], CIT v. Shaw Wallace Distilleries Ltd. [386 ITR 14 (Calcutta)] and The Himalayan Drug Co. v. DCIT in IT(TP)A No. 807/Bang/2016 dated 21.06.2017. 10. We have heard the rival submissions, perused the orders of the authorities below. It is not in dispute that SIPSPL has been amalgamated with STSPL by virtue of an order pursuant to scheme of amalgamation by the Hon'ble Bombay High Court passed on 26.0…

SIEMENS TECHNOLOGY AND SERVICES P. LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT 7(2), MUMBAI

ITA 1527/MUM/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Jul 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad, Hon'Ble & Shri N.K. Pradhan, Hon'Blem/S. Siemens Technology & Services Pvt. Ltd., V. Deputy Commissioner Of {Successor To Siemens Information Income Tax - 7(2) Processing Services Pvt. Ltd.,} Room No. 624, 6Th Floor 130, Pandurang Budhkar Marg Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road Worli, Mumbai – 400 018 Mumbai-400 020 (Appellant) (Respondent) Dy. Commissioner Of V. M/S. Siemens Information Processing Services Pvt. Ltd., Income Tax - 7(2) {Successor Of Siemens Technology & Services Pvt. Ltd.,} 130, Pandurang Budhkar Marg Room No. 624, Worli, Mumbai – 400 018 6Th Floor Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road Mumbai-400 020 (Appellant) (Respondent) M/S. Siemens Technology & Services Pvt. Ltd., V. Asst. Commissioner Of {Successor To Siemens Information Processing Income Tax, Services Pvt. Ltd.,} Circle - 8(2)(1) 130, Pandurang Budhkar Marg Room No. 624, 6Th Floor Worli, Mumbai – 400 018 Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road Mumbai-400 020 (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh JoshiFor Respondent: Shri Debashis Chanda
Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 144C(5)

…l be assessed in respect of the income of the previous year in which succession took place, up to the date of succession”. Ld. DR placed reliance in the case of Sky Light Hospitality LLP v. ACIT [92 taxmann.com 93 (SC)], CIT v. Shaw Wallace Distilleries Ltd. [386 ITR 14 (Calcutta)] and The Himalayan Drug Co. v. DCIT in IT(TP)A No. 807/Bang/2016 dated 21.06.2017. 10. We have heard the rival submissions, perused the orders of the authorities below. It is not in dispute that SIPSPL has been amalgamated with STSPL by virtue of an order pursuant to scheme of amalgamation by the Hon'ble Bombay High Court passed on 26.0…