Shoreline Hotel (P.) Ltd. v. CIT
What is Shoreline Hotel (P.) Ltd. v. CIT authority for?
Additions for non-genuine purchases or bogus expenditure are justified when an assessee fails to provide proof of purchases or ensure supplier presence, especially following information about dealers being 'hawala traders'. Furthermore, an assessment order passed without making proper inquiries or verifications into such claims can be deemed erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue, justifying revision under Section 263.
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2025.
Also referred to as
Shoreline Hotel (P.) Ltd. v. CIT · 98 Taxmann.com 234 · 259 Taxmann 49 · bogus purchases · non-genuine purchases · unexplained expenditure · Section 69C · hawala traders · failure to produce supplier · AO's duty to inquire · revision under Section 263 · erroneous assessment
Also reported as
Sections most often in play
Issues it is cited on
Judgments citing Shoreline Hotel (P.) Ltd. v. CIT
Showing 1–20 of 75 · Page 1 of 4