Sheraton International Inc. v. DDIT

107 ITD 120Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2007#14621 most cited
7

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2022.

Also reported as

106 TTJ 620

Judgments citing Sheraton International Inc. v. DDIT

ATOS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY HK LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (IT) 1(1)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal as filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1464/MUM/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Mar 2016AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri Ramit Kocharआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 1464/Mum/2015 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12) Atos Information Technology Deputy Commissioner Of बनाम/ Hk Limited, C/O Atos India Income Tax-(International V. Pvt. Ltd.,Plant No. 5, Taxation) – 1(1)(2), Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Scindia House, Ltd., Pirojshanagar, Lbs Mumbai. Marg, Vikhroli (W), Mumbai 400 097. "थायी लेखा सं./Pan : Aakcs8720L (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) .. (""यथ" / Respondent)

For Respondent: Shri Jabir S. Chouhan (CIT-
Section 115ASection 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 144C(5)Section 199Section 234Section 234BSection 9(1)(vi)

…stock exchange till the transactions are finally settled while in the case of the assessee company the access to infrastructure/software owned by the assessee company is not given to the SCB. The ld. Counsel also relied on the following decisions:- 1. (2007) 106 TTJ 620(Del. Trib.) in the case of Sheraton International Inc. v. DDIT 2. (2001)170 CTR 238(Mad. HC) in the case of Skycell Communications Limited v. DCIT ITA 1464/Mum/2015 6 and contended that it is only processing of data of SCB-India as per the banking regulatory requirement and analysis reports which are generated as per the requirement of Standar…

NGC NETWORK ASIA LLC,MUMBAI vs. JDIT (IT) RG 4, MUMBAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 7631/MUM/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Dec 2015AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri B.R.Baskaran (Am) & Amit Shukla, (Jm) सर्वश्री बी.आर.बास्करन, ऱेखा सदस्य एवं अमित शुक्ऱा, न्याययक सदस्य के समक्ष आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.7994/Mum/2011 & Ita No.7631/Mum/2012 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Year :2007-08 & 2008-09) बनाम/ Ngc Network Asia Llc, Joint Director Of Income Tax C/O S R Batliboi & Co., (International Taxation), Vs. 14Th Floor, The Ruby, Range-4, Senapati Bapat Marg, Scindia House, Tulsi Pipe Road, Ballard Estate, Dadar (W), Mumbai-400038. Mumbai-400028 (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. स्थधमी रेखध सं./जीआइआय सं./Pan: Aabcn3136G अऩीरधथी ओय से / Appellant By Shri Porus Kaka & Ms.Sheetal Shah प्रत्मथी की ओय से/Rspondent By Ms.Vandana Sagar सुनवधई की तधयीख / Date Of Hearing : 4.9.2015 घोषणध की तधयीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 16.12.2015 आदेश / O R D E R Per B.R. Baskaran (Am) These Are The Two Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Assessment Orders Passed For Assessment Years 2007-08 & 2008-09 In Pursuance Of Directions Issued By The Dispute Resolution Panel (Drp). Since Issues Urged In These Two Appeals Are Identical In Nature, They Are Being Disposed Of By This Common Order, For The Sake Of Convenience.

Section 9(1)(vi)

…hat the incidental use of trademark/trade name/log cannot be held to be royalty. In this regard, the Ld A.R placed reliance on the decision rendered by the Mumbai bench of Tribunal in the case of Sheratorn International Inc. Vs. Deputy Director of Income tax (107 ITD 120)(Delhi). The ld A.R also placed reliance on the decision rendered in the following cases in this regard:- 32 And ITA No.7631/Mum/12 (a) JDIT Vs. Harvard medical International, USA (16 taxmann.com 69) (b) Harvard Medical International Inc. Vs. DCIT (33 taxmann.com 50) 36. The ld A.R further submitted that the distribution rights given by it is…

Sheraton International Inc. v. DDIT (107 ITD 120) — Cited in 7 Judgments | BharatTax