IIANTUS TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD ,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-3(1)(1), BANGALORE
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 2358/BANG/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore02 Dec 2020AY 2015-16
Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri B.R. Baskaranassessment Year: 2015-16
For Appellant: Shri S. Ramasubramanyam, A.RFor Respondent: Smt. R. Premi, D.R
Section 195Section 40Section 9(1)(vi)
…urring judgment in the case of Rani Amrit Kaur v. CIT, (1946) 14 ITR 561, a decision of the Full Bench of the Allahabad High Court. A source of income was described by R. S. Pathak, J. (as he then was) in the following words in Seth Shiv Prasad v. CIT, (1972) 84 ITR 15 (All.) at page 18: - "A source of income, therefore, may be described as the spring or fount from which a clearly defined channel of income flows. It is that which by its nature and incidents constitutes a distinct and separate origin of income, capable of consideration as such in isolation from other sources of income, and which by the manner of…