Seshasayee Steels (P.) Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT

115 Taxmann.com 5Supreme Court of India2020#4962 most cited

What is Seshasayee Steels (P.) Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT authority for?

Granting a licence to a developer for land development does not constitute 'allowing possession' under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and therefore does not qualify as a 'transfer' under Section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

23

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Seshasayee Steels · Section 2(47)(v) · Section 53A · Transfer of Property Act · possession · licence · development agreement · capital gains tax

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Seshasayee Steels (P.) Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT

KANAK BHANJ DEO,BHUBANESWAR vs. ITO, WARD-5(3), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 21/CTK/2024[2017-2018]Status: HeardITAT Cuttack10 Jul 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Manish Agarwalआयकर अऩीऱ सं/Ita No.21/Ctk/2024 (ननधाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2017-2018) Kanak Bhanj Deo, Vs Ito, Ward-5(3), Bhubaneswar Plot No.2093/3341, Lane-5, Jaydev Vihar, Bhubaneswar, Odisha-751013 Pan No. :Angpb 4721 Q (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri N.R.Biswal, Ca राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 10/07/2024 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 10/07/2024 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi, Dated 16.11.2023, In Din & Order No.Itba/Nfac/S/250/2023- 24/1058002817(1) For The Assessment Year 2017-2018. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Has Entered Into Joint Development Agreement (Jda) With The Builder On 13.01.2012 & Further Executed A Distribution Agreement On 05.11.2014 According To Which The Land Of The Assessee Was Given To The Developer For Construction Of Multistoried Building & As Per Distribution Agreement, In Consideration The Assessee Is Entitled For 26% Area In The Constructed Building. During The Impugned Year The Assessee Has Got Four Flats Having Total Area Of 4220.23 Sq.Ft. (Including 92.85 Sq.Ft. Additional Area) As The Sale Consideration Being 26% Of The Newly Constructed Building. Out Of The Said

For Appellant: Shri N.R.Biswal, CAFor Respondent: Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr. DR
Section 54F

…आयकर अऩीऱीय अधधकरण, कटक न्यायऩीठ,कटक IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK BENCH CUTTACK BEFORE SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MANISH AGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अऩीऱ सं/ITA No.21/CTK/2024 (ननधाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2017-2018) Kanak Bhanj Deo, Vs ITO, Ward-5(3), Bhubaneswar Plot No.2093/3341, Lane-5, Jaydev Vihar, Bhubaneswar, Odisha-751013 PAN No. :ANGPB 4721 Q (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee by : Shri N.R.Biswal, CA राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue by : Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr. DR सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing : 10/07/2024 घोषणा की तारीख/Date…

RAJAMANICKAM MEERABAI,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 923/CHNY/2020[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Oct 2023AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manjunatha.Gआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.: 923/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2006 - 07 Smt. Rajamanikam Meerabai, The Income Tax Officer, Door No.29, Old No.T-2-2, Vs. Non Corporate Ward -15(3), Cauveri Salai Chennai. Besant Nagar South, Chennai – 600 090. Pan: Aaopm 7401M (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओरसे/Appellant By : Shri N. Arjun Raj, C.A ""यथ"क" ओ रसे/Respondent By : Shri P. Sajit Kumar, Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 10.10.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 18.10.2023 आदेश /O R D E R Per Mahavir Singh: This Appeal By The Assessee Is Arising Out Of The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-15, Chennai In Ita No.180/Cit(A)-15/2016-17 Dated 21.09.2020. The Assessment Was Framed By The Income Tax Officer, Non Corporate Ward 15(3), Chennai For The Assessment Year 2006-07 U/S. 143(3) R.W.S. 254 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter The ‘Act’), Vide Order Dated 31.03.2016. 2. The Only Issue In This Appeal Of Assessee Is As Regards To The Order Of Cit(A) Confirming The Action Of The Ao In Computing Long Term Capital Gain & Disallowing The Claim Of Exemption U/S.54 Of The Act. For This, Assessee Has Raised Various Grounds Which Are Argumentative & Exhaustive & Hence, Need Not Be Reproduced.

For Appellant: Shri N. Arjun Raj, C.A ""For Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar, JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 2(47)(v)Section 54

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ‘सी’ "यायपीठ,चे"ई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI "ीमहावीर "सह, उपा"य" एवं "ी मंजुनाथ. जी, लेखा सद"य के सम" BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI MANJUNATHA.G, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं./ITA No.: 923/CHNY/2020 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2006 - 07 Smt. Rajamanikam Meerabai, The Income Tax Officer, Door No.29, Old No.T-2-2, vs. Non Corporate Ward -15(3), Cauveri Salai Chennai. Besant Nagar South, Chennai – 600 090. PAN: AAOPM 7401M (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओरसे/Appellant by : Shri N. Arjun Raj, C.A ""यथ"क" ओ रसे/Respondent by :…

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 6,, PUNE vs. SUREKHA SUDHAKAR JADHAVAR,, PUNE

Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 151/PUN/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 Aug 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपीलसं. / Ita No.151/Pun/2018 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year : 2014-15 The Accit, Circle-6, Surekha Sudhakar Jadhavar, Pune. Vs. 64, Indraprastha, Wadgaon Bk, Kranti Nagar, Pune – 411041. Pan: Afspj 9291 B Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By Shri Sachin P Kumar – Ar Revenue By Shri Arvind Desai – Dr Date Of Hearing 12/08/2022 Date Of Pronouncement 29/08/2022 आदेश/ Order Per S.S.Godara, Jm: This Revenue’S Appeal For Assessment Year 2014-15 Is Directed Against The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)-4, Pune’S Order Dated 05.05.2017 Passed In Case No.Pn/Cit(A)-4/Ito, Wd-6(2), Pune/360/2016-17, In Proceedings U/S.143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [In Short “The Act”].

Section 143(3)Section 2(47)Section 2(47)(v)Section 45(1)

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण “ए” "ायपीठ पुणे म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, PUNE BEFORE SHRI S.S.GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपीलसं. / ITA No.151/PUN/2018 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year : 2014-15 The ACCIT, Circle-6, Surekha Sudhakar Jadhavar, Pune. Vs. 64, Indraprastha, Wadgaon Bk, Kranti Nagar, Pune – 411041. PAN: AFSPJ 9291 B Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee by Shri Sachin P Kumar – AR Revenue by Shri Arvind Desai – DR Date of hearing 12/08/2022 Date of pronouncement 29/08/2022 आदेश/ ORDER Per S.S.Godara, JM: This Revenue’s appeal for Assessm…

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 25(3), MUMBAI vs. PANKAJ ENTERPRISES, MUMBAI

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue for AY 2012

ITA 4876/MUM/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai06 Jul 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale () Assessment Year: 2012-13 Pankaj Enterprises, Jt. Cit Range-25(3), C/O Shankarlal Jain & Assoicates Pritashkar Bhavan, Bkc, 12, Engineer Building, 265, Vs. Bandra (E), Princess Street, Mumbai-400051. Mumbai-400 002. Pan No. Aacfp 3044 K Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2009-10 & Assessment Year: 2012-13 Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax- M/S Pankaj Enterprises, 25(3), Plot No. 1, Behind Ice Factory, Room No. 601, C-10, 6Th Floor, Vs. Saki Vihar Road, Chandivali, Pratyakshakar Bhavan, Bandra Mumbai-400072. Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai-400051. Pan No. Aacfp 3044 K Appellant Respondent Co No. 313/Mum/2018 (Ita No. 4875/Mum/2017) Assessment Year: 2009-10 & Co No. 312/Mum/2018 (Ita No. 4876/Mum/2017) Assessment Year: 2012-13

For Appellant: Mr. Shankarlal L. Jain, ARFor Respondent: Mr. Jasdeep Singh, CIT-DR

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “C” MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) AND SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE (JUDICIAL MEMBER) Assessment Year: 2012-13 Pankaj Enterprises, JT. CIT Range-25(3), C/o Shankarlal Jain & Assoicates Pritashkar Bhavan, BKC, 12, Engineer Building, 265, Vs. Bandra (E), Princess Street, Mumbai-400051. Mumbai-400 002. PAN No. AACFP 3044 K Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2009-10 & Assessment Year: 2012-13 Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax- M/s Pankaj Enterprises, 25(3), Plot No. 1, Behind ICE Factory, Room No. 601, C-10, 6th floor, Vs. Saki Vihar Road, Chandiv…

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 25(3), MUMBAI vs. PANKAJ ENTERPRISES, MUMBAI

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue for AY 2012

ITA 4875/MUM/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai06 Jul 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale () Assessment Year: 2012-13 Pankaj Enterprises, Jt. Cit Range-25(3), C/O Shankarlal Jain & Assoicates Pritashkar Bhavan, Bkc, 12, Engineer Building, 265, Vs. Bandra (E), Princess Street, Mumbai-400051. Mumbai-400 002. Pan No. Aacfp 3044 K Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2009-10 & Assessment Year: 2012-13 Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax- M/S Pankaj Enterprises, 25(3), Plot No. 1, Behind Ice Factory, Room No. 601, C-10, 6Th Floor, Vs. Saki Vihar Road, Chandivali, Pratyakshakar Bhavan, Bandra Mumbai-400072. Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai-400051. Pan No. Aacfp 3044 K Appellant Respondent Co No. 313/Mum/2018 (Ita No. 4875/Mum/2017) Assessment Year: 2009-10 & Co No. 312/Mum/2018 (Ita No. 4876/Mum/2017) Assessment Year: 2012-13

For Appellant: Mr. Shankarlal L. Jain, ARFor Respondent: Mr. Jasdeep Singh, CIT-DR

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “C” MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) AND SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE (JUDICIAL MEMBER) Assessment Year: 2012-13 Pankaj Enterprises, JT. CIT Range-25(3), C/o Shankarlal Jain & Assoicates Pritashkar Bhavan, BKC, 12, Engineer Building, 265, Vs. Bandra (E), Princess Street, Mumbai-400051. Mumbai-400 002. PAN No. AACFP 3044 K Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2009-10 & Assessment Year: 2012-13 Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax- M/s Pankaj Enterprises, 25(3), Plot No. 1, Behind ICE Factory, Room No. 601, C-10, 6th floor, Vs. Saki Vihar Road, Chandiv…

PANKAJ ENTERPRISES,MUMBAI vs. JT CIT RG 25(3), MUMBAI

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue for AY 2012

ITA 3773/MUM/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai06 Jul 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale () Assessment Year: 2012-13 Pankaj Enterprises, Jt. Cit Range-25(3), C/O Shankarlal Jain & Assoicates Pritashkar Bhavan, Bkc, 12, Engineer Building, 265, Vs. Bandra (E), Princess Street, Mumbai-400051. Mumbai-400 002. Pan No. Aacfp 3044 K Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2009-10 & Assessment Year: 2012-13 Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax- M/S Pankaj Enterprises, 25(3), Plot No. 1, Behind Ice Factory, Room No. 601, C-10, 6Th Floor, Vs. Saki Vihar Road, Chandivali, Pratyakshakar Bhavan, Bandra Mumbai-400072. Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai-400051. Pan No. Aacfp 3044 K Appellant Respondent Co No. 313/Mum/2018 (Ita No. 4875/Mum/2017) Assessment Year: 2009-10 & Co No. 312/Mum/2018 (Ita No. 4876/Mum/2017) Assessment Year: 2012-13

For Appellant: Mr. Shankarlal L. Jain, ARFor Respondent: Mr. Jasdeep Singh, CIT-DR

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “C” MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) AND SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE (JUDICIAL MEMBER) Assessment Year: 2012-13 Pankaj Enterprises, JT. CIT Range-25(3), C/o Shankarlal Jain & Assoicates Pritashkar Bhavan, BKC, 12, Engineer Building, 265, Vs. Bandra (E), Princess Street, Mumbai-400051. Mumbai-400 002. PAN No. AACFP 3044 K Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2009-10 & Assessment Year: 2012-13 Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax- M/s Pankaj Enterprises, 25(3), Plot No. 1, Behind ICE Factory, Room No. 601, C-10, 6th floor, Vs. Saki Vihar Road, Chandiv…

Showing 120 of 23 · Page 1 of 2

Seshasayee Steels (P.) Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT (115 Taxmann.com 5) — Cited in 23 Judgments | BharatTax