GAYA PRASAD BAJAJ,ALLAHABAD vs. ITO, ALLAHABAD
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 375/ALLD/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad04 Aug 2021AY 2012-13
Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Raoassessment Year: 2012-13 Gaya Prasad Bajaj, V. Income Tax Officer, 34-A, Chak Zero Road, Ward-1(2) Allahabad, U.P. Allahabad, U.P. Pan-Aampb9895N (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Mr. Abhinav Mehrotra, C.A. Respondent By: Mr. A.K. Singh, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 05.07.2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 04.08.2021
For Appellant: Mr. Abhinav Mehrotra, C.AFor Respondent: Mr. A.K. Singh, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)
…against which SLP was dismissed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in (1991) 188 ITR (St) 84 (SC) Kanji Mal & Sons vs. CIT (1982) 138 IRT 391 (Del.) Delhi Cloth & General Mills Co. Ltd. vs. R.R. Gupta (1976) 38 STC 113,117 (SC) Sant Baba Mohan singh vs. CIT 91973) 90 ITR 197, 199 (Alld.) Sitaram Rathore vs. CIT 91981) 130 ITR 699 (Alld.) West Bengal State Electricity Board vs. Dy. CIT (2005) 278 ITR 218 (Cal.) Abhishek Jain vs. ITO (2018) 94 taxman.com 355 (Del.) 7. I have considered the rival submissions as well as relevant record. Both the parties have argued at length on the legal issue raised by the assessee chal…