Sanjay Bimalchand Jain v. PCIT-1, Nagpur

89 Taxmann.com 196High Court2018#340 most cited

What is Sanjay Bimalchand Jain v. PCIT-1, Nagpur authority for?

The exemption for long-term capital gains on share transactions is unavailable if the assessee fails to discharge the onus of proving the genuineness of gains arising from dubious share transactions designed to convert unaccounted income into tax-exempt capital gains. Courts will uphold an assessment based on the Revenue's evidence of price rigging or penny stock manipulation if the assessee cannot provide cogent evidence for the abnormal rise in share value.

251

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Sanjay Bimalchand Jain · Section 10(38) · Section 68 · Section 69C · bogus long term capital gain · penny stock · price rigging · circular trading · onus of proof · unexplained income · scrutiny assessment · colourable device

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Sanjay Bimalchand Jain v. PCIT-1, Nagpur

KAUSHALIYA SAMPATLAL DUDANI,JAMNAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(6), JAMNAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 659/RJT/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot01 Apr 2026AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Sainiआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.659/Rjt/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year :2012-2013 Kaushaliya Sampatlal Dudani The Ito, Ward-2(6), बनाम/ K-1/79/4 G.I.D.C., Shanker Ayakar Bhawan, Jamnagar Vs Tekri, Udyognagar, Jamnagar Jamnagar. Gujarart-361005 "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Abnpd8662P (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) िनधा"रती की ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Sagar Shah, Ld. Ar राज" की ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Abhimanyu Singh, Ld. Sr-Dr

For Appellant: Shri Sagar Shah, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh, Ld. Sr-DR
Section 10(38)Section 147Section 250Section 68Section 69

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण,राजकोट "ायपीठ, राजकोट। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, “SMC” RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT BEFORE DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No.659/RJT/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year :2012-2013 Kaushaliya Sampatlal Dudani The ITO, Ward-2(6), बनाम/ K-1/79/4 G.I.D.C., Shanker Ayakar Bhawan, Jamnagar Vs Tekri, Udyognagar, Jamnagar Jamnagar. Gujarart-361005 "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No.: ABNPD8662P (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) िनधा"रती की ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Sagar Shah, Ld. AR राज" की ओर से/Revenue by : Shri Abhimanyu Singh, Ld. Sr-DR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing…

VIPUL J. MODI HUF,MUMBAI vs. ITO, WARD 20(3)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the appellant is allowed

ITA 4188/MUM/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Jan 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: the ITAT. a) The appellant claims that the share of M/s ICVL Chemicals Ltd. was not a penny stock when the shares were sold. It was only post take over, the name of the company ICVL Chemicals Ltd. was changed to Ram Minerals & Chemicals Ltd. on 11.07.2014. During the hearing proceedings before the ITAT, the Ld.AR of the appellant filed a chronology of events, which shows that they were holding shares of Intellivate Capital Ventures Ltd. (“ICVL”) from 2010 and the purchase consideration was

Section 10(38)Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘K(SMC)’ BENCH, MUMBAI "ीमती बीना "प"लई , माननीय "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी ओ"कारे"वर "चदरा, माननीय लेखा सद"य SMT.BEENA PILLAI, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI OMKARESHWAR CHIDARA, HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.4188/MUM/2024 (िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2014-15) Vs. ITO, Ward 20(3)(1) Vipul J.Modi HUF Mumbai Mumbai PAN: AAAHV0890H (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""थ"/ Respondent) करदाता का "ितिनिध"/ : Shri Paresh Saparia, AR Assessee Represented by राज" का "ितिनिध"/ : Shri Bhagirat Ramawat, Sr.DR Department Represented by सुनवाई समा" होने की ितिथ/ : 04/11/2025 Date of C…

DEVANG BHUPENDRA SHAH,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER 32(1)(4), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 4218/MUM/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 Oct 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Prabhash Shankardevang Bhupendra Shah, V/S. Income Tax Officer, Ward – B/9, Neminath Apt., बनाम 32(1)(4), Kautilya Bhavan, Shimpoli Road, Borivali Bandra Kurla Complex, West, Mumbai – 400 092, Bandra (East), Mumbai– Maharashtra 400051, Maharashtra स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No: Aadps1211L Appellant/अपीलार्थी .. Respondent/प्रतिवादी

For Appellant: Shri Rahul Kapadia,ARFor Respondent: Shri Annavaran Kasuri, (Sr. AR)
Section 10(38)Section 143(3)Section 68Section 69C

…IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL“D” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Devang Bhupendra Shah, v/s. Income Tax Officer, Ward – B/9, Neminath Apt., बनाम 32(1)(4), Kautilya Bhavan, Shimpoli Road, Borivali Bandra Kurla Complex, West, Mumbai – 400 092, Bandra (East), Mumbai– Maharashtra 400051, Maharashtra स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No: AADPS1211L Appellant/अपीलार्थी .. Respondent/प्रतिवादी Appellant by : Shri Rahul Kapadia,AR Respondent by : Shri Annavaran Kasuri, (Sr. AR) Date of Hearing 11.08.2025 Date of Pronouncement 13.10.2025 आदेश…

Showing 120 of 251 · Page 1 of 13

...
Sanjay Bimalchand Jain v. PCIT-1, Nagpur (89 Taxmann.com 196) — Cited in 251 Judgments | BharatTax