Sam P. Bharucha v. Addl. CIT

25 Taxmann.com 381Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2012#7516 most cited
15

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2024.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Sam P. Bharucha v. Addl. CIT

ACIT, CIRCLE-61(1), NEW DELHI vs. OM PRAKASH KHAITAN, NEW DELHI

In the result, both the appeals by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 4702/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Apr 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Anubhav Sharmaआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.4701/Del/2018 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year:2011-12 बनाम Acit Om Prakash Khaitan Circle 61(1), Vs. B-1, Defence Colony, Room No. 2005, 20Th Floor, New Delhi. Block E-2, Dr. Shyma Prasad Mukherjee, Civic Centre, New Delhi. Pan No. Ahjpk7370H अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent & आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.4702/Del/2018 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year:2013-14 बनाम Acit Om Prakash Khaitan Circle 61(1), Vs. B-1, Defence Colony, Room No. 2005, 20Th Floor, New Delhi. Block E-2, Dr. Shyma Prasad Mukherjee, Civic Centre, New Delhi. Pan No. Ahjpk7370H अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

Section 14A

…he Hon’ble High Court has held as under: - “9. As regards the second issue concerning the disallowance under Section 14A of the Act, the ITAT noticed the decision of its co-ordinate Bench in Justice Sam P. Bharucha v. Addl, Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai 25 Taxmann.com 381 (Mum)and observed that in the present case, the AO had not recorded any finding that any expenditure incurred by the Assessee was attributable for earning the exempt income. In order to disallow the expenditure there must be a nexus between the expenditure incurred and the income not forming part of the total income. Consequently, the disa…

ACIT, CIRCLE-61(1), NEW DELHI vs. OM PRAKASH KHAITAN, NEW DELHI

In the result, both the appeals by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 4701/DEL/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Apr 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Anubhav Sharmaआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.4701/Del/2018 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year:2011-12 बनाम Acit Om Prakash Khaitan Circle 61(1), Vs. B-1, Defence Colony, Room No. 2005, 20Th Floor, New Delhi. Block E-2, Dr. Shyma Prasad Mukherjee, Civic Centre, New Delhi. Pan No. Ahjpk7370H अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent & आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.4702/Del/2018 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year:2013-14 बनाम Acit Om Prakash Khaitan Circle 61(1), Vs. B-1, Defence Colony, Room No. 2005, 20Th Floor, New Delhi. Block E-2, Dr. Shyma Prasad Mukherjee, Civic Centre, New Delhi. Pan No. Ahjpk7370H अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

Section 14A

…he Hon’ble High Court has held as under: - “9. As regards the second issue concerning the disallowance under Section 14A of the Act, the ITAT noticed the decision of its co-ordinate Bench in Justice Sam P. Bharucha v. Addl, Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai 25 Taxmann.com 381 (Mum)and observed that in the present case, the AO had not recorded any finding that any expenditure incurred by the Assessee was attributable for earning the exempt income. In order to disallow the expenditure there must be a nexus between the expenditure incurred and the income not forming part of the total income. Consequently, the disa…

DEEPAK AGARWAL,MUMBAI vs. ACIT CEN CIR 32, MUMBAI

In the result, the both appeals of the assessee are hereby partly allowed

ITA 4188/MUM/2011[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Dec 2015AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri N.K.Billaiya & Amarjit Singhआयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No.4187/M/11 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2008-09) Shri Devesh Agarwal Assistant Commissioner Of बनाम/ C/O. M/S. Ravi & Dev, Income Tax, Central Circle Vs. Chartered Accountants, 32 377-B, First Floor, Mumbai. Jagannath Shankar Seth Marg, Chira Bazar, Mumbai - 400002 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aekpa7464G

For Appellant: Shri Devendra A. MehtaFor Respondent: Shri Sanjeev Kashyap
Section 14ASection 69B

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण,“डी” "यायपीठ, मुंबई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE S/SHRI N.K.BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND AMARJIT SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No.4187/M/11 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2008-09) Shri Devesh Agarwal Assistant Commissioner of बनाम/ C/o. M/s. Ravi & Dev, Income Tax, Central Circle Vs. Chartered Accountants, 32 377-B, First Floor, Mumbai. Jagannath Shankar Seth Marg, Chira Bazar, Mumbai - 400002 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : AEKPA7464G आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No.4188/M/11 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2008-09) Shri Deepak Agarwal Ass…

DEVESH AGARWAL,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 32, MUMBAI

In the result, the both appeals of the assessee are hereby partly allowed

ITA 4187/MUM/2011[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Dec 2015AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri N.K.Billaiya & Amarjit Singhआयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No.4187/M/11 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2008-09) Shri Devesh Agarwal Assistant Commissioner Of बनाम/ C/O. M/S. Ravi & Dev, Income Tax, Central Circle Vs. Chartered Accountants, 32 377-B, First Floor, Mumbai. Jagannath Shankar Seth Marg, Chira Bazar, Mumbai - 400002 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aekpa7464G

For Appellant: Shri Devendra A. MehtaFor Respondent: Shri Sanjeev Kashyap
Section 14ASection 69B

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण,“डी” "यायपीठ, मुंबई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE S/SHRI N.K.BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND AMARJIT SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No.4187/M/11 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2008-09) Shri Devesh Agarwal Assistant Commissioner of बनाम/ C/o. M/s. Ravi & Dev, Income Tax, Central Circle Vs. Chartered Accountants, 32 377-B, First Floor, Mumbai. Jagannath Shankar Seth Marg, Chira Bazar, Mumbai - 400002 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : AEKPA7464G आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No.4188/M/11 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2008-09) Shri Deepak Agarwal Ass…