DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, TIRUPUR vs. LOOCUST INCORP, TIRUPUR
In the result, appeal of the assessee vide CO Nos
ITA 1695/CHNY/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai02 Dec 2025AY 2016-17
Bench: Shri Ss Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1692, 1693, 1694 & 1695 / Chny/2025 Assessment Years-2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16 & 2016-17 Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Loocust Incorp, No.28A, Mgr Nagar, 14Th Street, Circle-1(1) Tirupur. Pn Road, Tirupur, Tamil Nadu-641 602. [Pan: Aabfl6721C] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Co Nos.-77, 78, 79 & 80 / Chny/2025, Assessment Years-2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16 & 2016-17 Loocust Incorp, Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, No.28A, Mgr Nagar, 14Th Street, Circle-1(1) Pn Road, Tirupur, Tirupur. Tamil Nadu-641 602. [Pan: Aabfl6721C] (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By : Mr.T.Banusekar, Advocate प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue By : Mr.Shiva Srinivas, Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 08.10.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 02.12.2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amitabh Shukla, A.M :
For Appellant: Mr.T.Banusekar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr.Shiva Srinivas, CIT
Section 132Section 143(3)
…s 143(2). 10.0 As regards, the issue of Ld.AO not invoking the provisions of section 153C, Ld.DR Shri Shiva Srinivas argued that the issue is squarely covered in Revenue’s favour by the decision of Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of Saloni Prakash Kumar 458 ITR 452 Madras. The Ld.Counsel for the assessee observed that the decision of Hon’ble Madras High Court supra is a single Judge decision. In contrast, he invited our reference to couple of non-jurisdictional judicial precedents as supporting its case. 11.0 The Ld.Counsel for the assessee argued in favour of the order of Ld.CIT(A). In support of its cont…