S.T.Sadiq v. State of Kerala

DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (TDS)

Bench: SANGEET LODHA,RAMESHWAR VYAS

…4 62. AIR 1961 SC 1457 63. (2004) 1 SCC 712) 64. AIR 1944 FC 86 65. 2 L. Ed. 276 66. (1997) 8 SCC 522 67. (2014) 4 SCC 583 68. AIR 1966 SC 1637 69. (1973) 1 SCR 515 70. (2013) SCC OnLine 622 (Bom HC DB) 71. (2003) ECR 783 (SC) 72. (2015) 4 SCC 400 73. AIR 1996 SC 188). 74. (1975) Supp SCC 1 75. AIR 1963 SC 1742 76. Criminal Appeal No. 75/69 decided on 10-9-1969 77. (1965) 2 Mys L J 40 78. 1992 Supp (1) SCC 304 79. 1992 Supp (1) SCC 391 80. (2006) 3 SCC 643 81. (1983) 4 SCC 508 82. (1970) 1 SCC 248 83. (1981) 4 SCC 675 84. AIR 1952 SC 75 85. AIR 1951 SC 41 86. (2…

M/S SLR METALIKS LTD vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

In the result, these petitions must succeed

Bench: ABHAY SHREENIWAS OKA (CJ),P.S.DINESH KUMAR

…posed the levy all over again by re-christening it as ‘fee’. 37. The view taken in the case of D.Cawasji (supra), has been quoted with the approval by the Supreme Court of India in the case of S.T.Sadiq v. State of Kerala and others reported in (2015) 4 SCC 400 relied upon by Mr. D.L.N. Rao. 38. Further, it is also settled, that an ‘explanation’ to a statutory provision is added to explain the meaning and intendment of the Act. In the case of M.P.Cement Manufacturers’ Association v. State of M.P. and others, 110 reported in (2004) 2 SCC 249 relied upon by Mr.D.L.N.Rao, the State ther…

KARNATAKA SPONGE IRON MANUFACTURERS vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

In the result, these petitions must succeed

Bench: ABHAY SHREENIWAS OKA (CJ),P.S.DINESH KUMAR

…posed the levy all over again by re-christening it as ‘fee’. 37. The view taken in the case of D.Cawasji (supra), has been quoted with the approval by the Supreme Court of India in the case of S.T.Sadiq v. State of Kerala and others reported in (2015) 4 SCC 400 relied upon by Mr. D.L.N. Rao. 38. Further, it is also settled, that an ‘explanation’ to a statutory provision is added to explain the meaning and intendment of the Act. In the case of M.P.Cement Manufacturers’ Association v. State of M.P. and others, 110 reported in (2004) 2 SCC 249 relied upon by Mr.D.L.N.Rao, the State ther…

SRI V N K MENON vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

In the result, these petitions must succeed

Bench: ABHAY SHREENIWAS OKA (CJ),P.S.DINESH KUMAR

…posed the levy all over again by re-christening it as ‘fee’. 37. The view taken in the case of D.Cawasji (supra), has been quoted with the approval by the Supreme Court of India in the case of S.T.Sadiq v. State of Kerala and others reported in (2015) 4 SCC 400 relied upon by Mr. D.L.N. Rao. 38. Further, it is also settled, that an ‘explanation’ to a statutory provision is added to explain the meaning and intendment of the Act. In the case of M.P.Cement Manufacturers’ Association v. State of M.P. and others, 110 reported in (2004) 2 SCC 249 relied upon by Mr.D.L.N.Rao, the State ther…

BIOP STEELS AND POWER PRIVATE LIMITED vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

In the result, these petitions must succeed

Bench: ABHAY SHREENIWAS OKA (CJ),P.S.DINESH KUMAR

…posed the levy all over again by re-christening it as ‘fee’. 37. The view taken in the case of D.Cawasji (supra), has been quoted with the approval by the Supreme Court of India in the case of S.T.Sadiq v. State of Kerala and others reported in (2015) 4 SCC 400 relied upon by Mr. D.L.N. Rao. 38. Further, it is also settled, that an ‘explanation’ to a statutory provision is added to explain the meaning and intendment of the Act. In the case of M.P.Cement Manufacturers’ Association v. State of M.P. and others, 110 reported in (2004) 2 SCC 249 relied upon by Mr.D.L.N.Rao, the State ther…

MARUTI ISPAT & ENERGY PRIVATE LIMITED vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

In the result, these petitions must succeed

Bench: ABHAY SHREENIWAS OKA (CJ),P.S.DINESH KUMAR

…posed the levy all over again by re-christening it as ‘fee’. 37. The view taken in the case of D.Cawasji (supra), has been quoted with the approval by the Supreme Court of India in the case of S.T.Sadiq v. State of Kerala and others reported in (2015) 4 SCC 400 relied upon by Mr. D.L.N. Rao. 38. Further, it is also settled, that an ‘explanation’ to a statutory provision is added to explain the meaning and intendment of the Act. In the case of M.P.Cement Manufacturers’ Association v. State of M.P. and others, 110 reported in (2004) 2 SCC 249 relied upon by Mr.D.L.N.Rao, the State ther…

M/S. THAKUR INDUSTRIES vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

In the result, these petitions must succeed

Bench: ABHAY SHREENIWAS OKA (CJ),P.S.DINESH KUMAR

…posed the levy all over again by re-christening it as ‘fee’. 37. The view taken in the case of D.Cawasji (supra), has been quoted with the approval by the Supreme Court of India in the case of S.T.Sadiq v. State of Kerala and others reported in (2015) 4 SCC 400 relied upon by Mr. D.L.N. Rao. 38. Further, it is also settled, that an ‘explanation’ to a statutory provision is added to explain the meaning and intendment of the Act. In the case of M.P.Cement Manufacturers’ Association v. State of M.P. and others, 110 reported in (2004) 2 SCC 249 relied upon by Mr.D.L.N.Rao, the State ther…

M/S. GOGGA GURUSANTHIAH & BROS vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

In the result, these petitions must succeed

Bench: ABHAY SHREENIWAS OKA (CJ),P.S.DINESH KUMAR

…posed the levy all over again by re-christening it as ‘fee’. 37. The view taken in the case of D.Cawasji (supra), has been quoted with the approval by the Supreme Court of India in the case of S.T.Sadiq v. State of Kerala and others reported in (2015) 4 SCC 400 relied upon by Mr. D.L.N. Rao. 38. Further, it is also settled, that an ‘explanation’ to a statutory provision is added to explain the meaning and intendment of the Act. In the case of M.P.Cement Manufacturers’ Association v. State of M.P. and others, 110 reported in (2004) 2 SCC 249 relied upon by Mr.D.L.N.Rao, the State ther…

M/S VEERABHADRAPPA SANGAPPA AND vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

In the result, these petitions must succeed

Bench: ABHAY SHREENIWAS OKA (CJ),P.S.DINESH KUMAR

…posed the levy all over again by re-christening it as ‘fee’. 37. The view taken in the case of D.Cawasji (supra), has been quoted with the approval by the Supreme Court of India in the case of S.T.Sadiq v. State of Kerala and others reported in (2015) 4 SCC 400 relied upon by Mr. D.L.N. Rao. 38. Further, it is also settled, that an ‘explanation’ to a statutory provision is added to explain the meaning and intendment of the Act. In the case of M.P.Cement Manufacturers’ Association v. State of M.P. and others, 110 reported in (2004) 2 SCC 249 relied upon by Mr.D.L.N.Rao, the State ther…

MR B RUDRAGOUDA vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

In the result, these petitions must succeed

Bench: ABHAY SHREENIWAS OKA (CJ),P.S.DINESH KUMAR

…posed the levy all over again by re-christening it as ‘fee’. 37. The view taken in the case of D.Cawasji (supra), has been quoted with the approval by the Supreme Court of India in the case of S.T.Sadiq v. State of Kerala and others reported in (2015) 4 SCC 400 relied upon by Mr. D.L.N. Rao. 38. Further, it is also settled, that an ‘explanation’ to a statutory provision is added to explain the meaning and intendment of the Act. In the case of M.P.Cement Manufacturers’ Association v. State of M.P. and others, 110 reported in (2004) 2 SCC 249 relied upon by Mr.D.L.N.Rao, the State ther…

M/S M HANUMANTHA RAO vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

In the result, these petitions must succeed

Bench: ABHAY SHREENIWAS OKA (CJ),P.S.DINESH KUMAR

…posed the levy all over again by re-christening it as ‘fee’. 37. The view taken in the case of D.Cawasji (supra), has been quoted with the approval by the Supreme Court of India in the case of S.T.Sadiq v. State of Kerala and others reported in (2015) 4 SCC 400 relied upon by Mr. D.L.N. Rao. 38. Further, it is also settled, that an ‘explanation’ to a statutory provision is added to explain the meaning and intendment of the Act. In the case of M.P.Cement Manufacturers’ Association v. State of M.P. and others, 110 reported in (2004) 2 SCC 249 relied upon by Mr.D.L.N.Rao, the State ther…

JAI RAJ ISPAT LIMITED vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

In the result, these petitions must succeed

Bench: ABHAY SHREENIWAS OKA (CJ),P.S.DINESH KUMAR

…posed the levy all over again by re-christening it as ‘fee’. 37. The view taken in the case of D.Cawasji (supra), has been quoted with the approval by the Supreme Court of India in the case of S.T.Sadiq v. State of Kerala and others reported in (2015) 4 SCC 400 relied upon by Mr. D.L.N. Rao. 38. Further, it is also settled, that an ‘explanation’ to a statutory provision is added to explain the meaning and intendment of the Act. In the case of M.P.Cement Manufacturers’ Association v. State of M.P. and others, 110 reported in (2004) 2 SCC 249 relied upon by Mr.D.L.N.Rao, the State ther…

M/S REACTIVE METALS OF INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

In the result, these petitions must succeed

Bench: ABHAY SHREENIWAS OKA (CJ),P.S.DINESH KUMAR

…posed the levy all over again by re-christening it as ‘fee’. 37. The view taken in the case of D.Cawasji (supra), has been quoted with the approval by the Supreme Court of India in the case of S.T.Sadiq v. State of Kerala and others reported in (2015) 4 SCC 400 relied upon by Mr. D.L.N. Rao. 38. Further, it is also settled, that an ‘explanation’ to a statutory provision is added to explain the meaning and intendment of the Act. In the case of M.P.Cement Manufacturers’ Association v. State of M.P. and others, 110 reported in (2004) 2 SCC 249 relied upon by Mr.D.L.N.Rao, the State ther…

M/S. ZEENATH TRANSPORT COMPANY vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

In the result, these petitions must succeed

Bench: ABHAY SHREENIWAS OKA (CJ),P.S.DINESH KUMAR

…posed the levy all over again by re-christening it as ‘fee’. 37. The view taken in the case of D.Cawasji (supra), has been quoted with the approval by the Supreme Court of India in the case of S.T.Sadiq v. State of Kerala and others reported in (2015) 4 SCC 400 relied upon by Mr. D.L.N. Rao. 38. Further, it is also settled, that an ‘explanation’ to a statutory provision is added to explain the meaning and intendment of the Act. In the case of M.P.Cement Manufacturers’ Association v. State of M.P. and others, 110 reported in (2004) 2 SCC 249 relied upon by Mr.D.L.N.Rao, the State ther…

BALAJISWAMY PREMIUM STEELS (P) LTD vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

In the result, these petitions must succeed

Bench: ABHAY SHREENIWAS OKA (CJ),P.S.DINESH KUMAR

…posed the levy all over again by re-christening it as ‘fee’. 37. The view taken in the case of D.Cawasji (supra), has been quoted with the approval by the Supreme Court of India in the case of S.T.Sadiq v. State of Kerala and others reported in (2015) 4 SCC 400 relied upon by Mr. D.L.N. Rao. 38. Further, it is also settled, that an ‘explanation’ to a statutory provision is added to explain the meaning and intendment of the Act. In the case of M.P.Cement Manufacturers’ Association v. State of M.P. and others, 110 reported in (2004) 2 SCC 249 relied upon by Mr.D.L.N.Rao, the State ther…

PRAKASH SPONGE IRON & POWER PVT LTD vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

In the result, these petitions must succeed

Bench: ABHAY SHREENIWAS OKA (CJ),P.S.DINESH KUMAR

…posed the levy all over again by re-christening it as ‘fee’. 37. The view taken in the case of D.Cawasji (supra), has been quoted with the approval by the Supreme Court of India in the case of S.T.Sadiq v. State of Kerala and others reported in (2015) 4 SCC 400 relied upon by Mr. D.L.N. Rao. 38. Further, it is also settled, that an ‘explanation’ to a statutory provision is added to explain the meaning and intendment of the Act. In the case of M.P.Cement Manufacturers’ Association v. State of M.P. and others, 110 reported in (2004) 2 SCC 249 relied upon by Mr.D.L.N.Rao, the State ther…

SRI.R.PRAVEEN CHANDRA vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

In the result, these petitions must succeed

Bench: ABHAY SHREENIWAS OKA (CJ),P.S.DINESH KUMAR

…posed the levy all over again by re-christening it as ‘fee’. 37. The view taken in the case of D.Cawasji (supra), has been quoted with the approval by the Supreme Court of India in the case of S.T.Sadiq v. State of Kerala and others reported in (2015) 4 SCC 400 relied upon by Mr. D.L.N. Rao. 38. Further, it is also settled, that an ‘explanation’ to a statutory provision is added to explain the meaning and intendment of the Act. In the case of M.P.Cement Manufacturers’ Association v. State of M.P. and others, 110 reported in (2004) 2 SCC 249 relied upon by Mr.D.L.N.Rao, the State ther…

SRI R CHARUCHANDRA vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

In the result, these petitions must succeed

Bench: ABHAY SHREENIWAS OKA (CJ),P.S.DINESH KUMAR

…posed the levy all over again by re-christening it as ‘fee’. 37. The view taken in the case of D.Cawasji (supra), has been quoted with the approval by the Supreme Court of India in the case of S.T.Sadiq v. State of Kerala and others reported in (2015) 4 SCC 400 relied upon by Mr. D.L.N. Rao. 38. Further, it is also settled, that an ‘explanation’ to a statutory provision is added to explain the meaning and intendment of the Act. In the case of M.P.Cement Manufacturers’ Association v. State of M.P. and others, 110 reported in (2004) 2 SCC 249 relied upon by Mr.D.L.N.Rao, the State ther…

M/S. DODDANNAVAR BROTHERS vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

In the result, these petitions must succeed

Bench: ABHAY SHREENIWAS OKA (CJ),P.S.DINESH KUMAR

…posed the levy all over again by re-christening it as ‘fee’. 37. The view taken in the case of D.Cawasji (supra), has been quoted with the approval by the Supreme Court of India in the case of S.T.Sadiq v. State of Kerala and others reported in (2015) 4 SCC 400 relied upon by Mr. D.L.N. Rao. 38. Further, it is also settled, that an ‘explanation’ to a statutory provision is added to explain the meaning and intendment of the Act. In the case of M.P.Cement Manufacturers’ Association v. State of M.P. and others, 110 reported in (2004) 2 SCC 249 relied upon by Mr.D.L.N.Rao, the State ther…

STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

In the result, these petitions must succeed

Bench: ABHAY SHREENIWAS OKA (CJ),P.S.DINESH KUMAR

…posed the levy all over again by re-christening it as ‘fee’. 37. The view taken in the case of D.Cawasji (supra), has been quoted with the approval by the Supreme Court of India in the case of S.T.Sadiq v. State of Kerala and others reported in (2015) 4 SCC 400 relied upon by Mr. D.L.N. Rao. 38. Further, it is also settled, that an ‘explanation’ to a statutory provision is added to explain the meaning and intendment of the Act. In the case of M.P.Cement Manufacturers’ Association v. State of M.P. and others, 110 reported in (2004) 2 SCC 249 relied upon by Mr.D.L.N.Rao, the State ther…