Reuters Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, (International Taxation), Range 2(1), Mumbai

155 ITD 844Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2015#7684 most cited

What is Reuters Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, (International Taxation), Range 2(1), Mumbai authority for?

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) determined that no further profit can be attributed to a permanent establishment (PE) if the transaction between the assessee and another entity has already been found to be at arm's length.

14

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2022 to 2022.

Also referred to as

Reuters Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax · ITAT · transfer pricing · arm's length · permanent establishment · attributed profit · TPO order · ESPN India

Judgments citing Reuters Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, (International Taxation), Range 2(1), Mumbai

Reuters Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, (International Taxation), Range 2(1), Mumbai (155 ITD 844) — Cited in 14 Judgments | BharatTax