M.R. SATHAYANARAYAN AKALWADI vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/103019/2016HC Karnataka22 Dec 2021
Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Hemant Chandangoudar W.P Nos.108208 -108209 /2016 (La-Res) C/W W.P No.104784/2016, Wp No.106158/2016, W.P No.106159/2016, W.P No.106157/2016, W.P No.107889/2016, W.P Nos.109564 - 109565/2016, W.P No.112114/2017, W.P No.112263/2017, W.P Nos.104989-990/2018, W.P No.106557/2015, W.P Nos.106269-106270/2015, W.P No.103770/2015, W.P No.104783/2016, W.P No.104728/2016, W.P No.104025/2016, W.P No.103548/2016, W.P Nos.103486-103488/2016, W.P No.103319/2016, W.P No.102905/2016, W.P No.103019/2016, W.P No.102904/2016, W.P No.103451/2016, W.P No.103447/2016, W.P No.104785/2016, W.P No.103380/2016, W.P No.101172/2016, W.P No.106558/2015, W.P Nos.100431-100435/2016, W.P Nos.103479-103481/2016, W.P Nos.103483-103484/2016, W.P No.103485/2016 & W.P No.103482/2016
…administrative, will be set aside if there 81 is manifest error in the exercise of power or if the exercise of such power is manifestly arbitrary. 24. Referring to Municipal Council, Neemuch v. Mahadeo Real Estate and Ors. reported in (2019) 10 SCC 738, the Apex Court made it very clear that if the decision maker has not understood the law correctly that regulates his decision-making power or when it is found that the decision of the decision maker is vitiated by irrationality invoking the principle of "Wednesbury Unreasonableness" or if it is found that there has been a procedural impropr…