RASIPURAM TEXTILE PRIVATE LIMITED & OTHERS (5) (2005)8 SCC 89 S.M.S.PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. v. NEETA BHALLA AND ANOTHER (6)
5 SCC 661Reported decision2012#1141 most cited
What is RASIPURAM TEXTILE PRIVATE LIMITED & OTHERS (5) (2005)8 SCC 89 S.M.S.PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. v. NEETA BHALLA AND ANOTHER (6) authority for?
The case clarifies the requirement of mens rea for establishing criminal liability under statutory provisions, particularly in relation to the vicarious liability of directors or officers for offenses committed by a company. It is cited in arguments concerning whether a specific Act dispenses with the need for mens rea.
99
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2021.
Also referred to as
S.M.S. Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Neeta Bhalla · 2012 5 SCC 661 · mens rea requirement · statutory offenses · criminal liability · corporate liability · director liability · vicarious liability · absence of mens rea · strict liability offenses · impugned Act
Judgments citing RASIPURAM TEXTILE PRIVATE LIMITED & OTHERS (5) (2005)8 SCC 89 S.M.S.PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. v. NEETA BHALLA AND ANOTHER (6)
Showing 1–20 of 99 · Page 1 of 5
