RAO SHIV BAHADUR SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF VINDHYA PRADESH. 31

3 SCC 569Reported decision1994#1094 most cited

What is RAO SHIV BAHADUR SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF VINDHYA PRADESH. 31 authority for?

Stringent bail provisions under special legislations like the TADA Act are justified on the presumption that the trial will proceed without undue delay; gross delays for undertrials can invoke the right to personal liberty and speedy trial under Article 21 of the Constitution.

101

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2024.

Also referred to as

Kartar Singh v. State of Punjab · (1994) 3 SCC 569 · TADA bail provisions · Section 20(8) TADA · Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act · NDPS bail · speedy trial · Article 21 · undue delay · constitutional validity · undertrial rights

Judgments citing RAO SHIV BAHADUR SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF VINDHYA PRADESH. 31

Showing 120 of 101 · Page 1 of 6