Ramprasad Aggarwal v. ITO 2(3)(2), Mumbai

100 Taxmann.com 172Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2018#2157 most cited

What is Ramprasad Aggarwal v. ITO 2(3)(2), Mumbai authority for?

A share transaction, substantiated by documentary evidence such as payment by cheque, dematerialization, holding in a Demat account, and sale proceeds through banking channels, cannot be deemed bogus merely on suspicion or surmises without cogent contrary material from the revenue.

53

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2020 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Ramprasad Aggarwal v. ITO · Section 10(38) · Section 68 · bogus long term capital gain · penny stock · demat account evidence · genuineness of share transactions · suspicion and surmises · third party information · entry operator

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Ramprasad Aggarwal v. ITO 2(3)(2), Mumbai

DEVANG BHUPENDRA SHAH,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER 32(1)(4), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 4218/MUM/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 Oct 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Prabhash Shankardevang Bhupendra Shah, V/S. Income Tax Officer, Ward – B/9, Neminath Apt., बनाम 32(1)(4), Kautilya Bhavan, Shimpoli Road, Borivali Bandra Kurla Complex, West, Mumbai – 400 092, Bandra (East), Mumbai– Maharashtra 400051, Maharashtra स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No: Aadps1211L Appellant/अपीलार्थी .. Respondent/प्रतिवादी

For Appellant: Shri Rahul Kapadia,ARFor Respondent: Shri Annavaran Kasuri, (Sr. AR)
Section 10(38)Section 143(3)Section 68Section 69C

…IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL“D” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Devang Bhupendra Shah, v/s. Income Tax Officer, Ward – B/9, Neminath Apt., बनाम 32(1)(4), Kautilya Bhavan, Shimpoli Road, Borivali Bandra Kurla Complex, West, Mumbai – 400 092, Bandra (East), Mumbai– Maharashtra 400051, Maharashtra स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No: AADPS1211L Appellant/अपीलार्थी .. Respondent/प्रतिवादी Appellant by : Shri Rahul Kapadia,AR Respondent by : Shri Annavaran Kasuri, (Sr. AR) Date of Hearing 11.08.2025 Date of Pronouncement 13.10.2025 आदेश…

Showing 120 of 53 · Page 1 of 3

Ramprasad Aggarwal v. ITO 2(3)(2), Mumbai (100 Taxmann.com 172) — Cited in 53 Judgments | BharatTax