Rakesh Janghu v. CPC, Bangalore

136 Taxmann.com 154High Court2022#1659 most cited

What is Rakesh Janghu v. CPC, Bangalore authority for?

Amendments made by the Finance Act, 2021 to Section 36(1)(va) and Section 43B of the Income Tax Act are prospective.

68

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2022 to 2024.

Also referred to as

Rakesh Janghu v. CPC · Bangalore · Section 36(1)(va) · Section 43B · Finance Act 2021 amendments · prospective · deduction for employee contributions · due date

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Rakesh Janghu v. CPC, Bangalore

SHREEOMSINGH BHAGWANSINGH RAWAT,VADODARA vs. THE ADIT, CPC, BENGALURU PRESENT JURIDICTION THE DY.CIT CIRCLE-1(1)(1), VADODARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 514/AHD/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad14 Feb 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year : 2020-21 Shreeomsingh Bhagwansingh The Dy.Cit Rawat Vs Circle-1(1)(1) 905/6, Gidc Makarpura Vadodara Vadodara 390 010 Pan: Aampr 5475 L अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Parimalsinh B.Parmar, Ar Revenue By : Ms.Saumya Pandey Jain, Sr.Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 07/02/2024 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 14/02/2024 आदेश/O R D E R Per Ms.Suchitra Kamblethis Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 25/04/2023 Passed By The Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi [Hereinafter Referred To As “Cit(A)” In Short] For Assessment Year 2020-21. 2. Grounds Of Appeal Are As Under:

For Appellant: Shri Parimalsinh B.Parmar, ARFor Respondent: Ms.Saumya Pandey Jain, Sr.DR
Section 143(1)Section 234BSection 36(1)(va)

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ ‘ए’, अहमदाबाद अहमदाबाद । आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ अहमदाबाद अहमदाबाद IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “ A ” BENCH, AHMEDABAD ] ] BEFORE MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year : 2020-21 Shreeomsingh Bhagwansingh The dy.CIT Rawat Vs Circle-1(1)(1) 905/6, GIDC Makarpura Vadodara Vadodara 390 010 PAN: AAMPR 5475 L अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Parimalsinh B.Parmar, AR Revenue by : Ms.Saumya Pandey Jain, Sr.DR…

Showing 120 of 68 · Page 1 of 4

Rakesh Janghu v. CPC, Bangalore (136 Taxmann.com 154) — Cited in 68 Judgments | BharatTax