What is Rajmandir Estates (P.) Ltd. v. PCIT authority for?

An Assessing Officer's order is considered erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue, warranting revision under Section 263, if there is a lack of proper inquiry or non-application of mind to crucial aspects of the assessment, even where some information has been furnished by the assessee.

How many judgments cite Rajmandir Estates (P.) Ltd. v. PCIT?

88 judgments on BharatTax cite Rajmandir Estates (P.) Ltd. v. PCIT (77 Taxmann.com 285), spanning 2017 to 2025.

Which sections of the Income Tax Act does Rajmandir Estates (P.) Ltd. v. PCIT come up under?

It is most often cited in judgments turning on Section 263, Section 143(3), Section 142(1), Section 144B, Section 147, Section 143(2).

Rajmandir Estates (P.) Ltd. v. PCIT (77 Taxmann.com 285)

GAURAV KUMAR ARYA,NEW DELHI vs. PCIT -20, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2000/DEL/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 Nov 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S Rifaur Rahman & Shri Vimal Kumarassessment Year: 2015-16 Gaurav Kumar Arya, Vs. Pr. Commissioner Of Income 3-P, Pocket-4, Tax, Delhi-20, Kondly Gharoli-Ii, Mayur New Delhi. Vihar, Delhi-1100 96 Pan: Airpa0102C (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: S/Shri K. Sampath & V. RajkumarFor Respondent: Shri Sanjeev Kaushal, CIT (DR)

Section 142(1)Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 263

…INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “B”: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI S RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI VIMAL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2015-16 Gaurav Kumar Arya, Vs. Pr. Commissioner of Income 3-P, Pocket-4, Tax, Delhi-20, Kondly Gharoli-II, Mayur New Delhi. Vihar, Delhi-1100 96 PAN: AIRPA0102C (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: S/Shri K. Sampath & V. Rajkumar, Advs. Department by: Shri Sanjeev Kaushal, CIT (DR) Date of Hearing: 21.08.2025 Date of pronouncement: 14.11.2025 O R D E R PER VIMAL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER: The appeal filed by assessee is against order dated 28.03.2024 of…

SURYA ROSHNI LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 7, NEW DELHI

ITA 1444/DEL/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Aug 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263Section 263(1)

…ITA Nos.1445 & 1444/Del/2024 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI “G” BENCH: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.1445 & 1444/Del/2024 [Assessment Year : 2014-15 & 2015-16] Surya Roshni Limited, 2nd Floor, Padma Tower-1, Rajendra Place, New Delhi-110008. PAN-AAACS3558C vs Pr.CIT-7, Delhi APPELLANT RESPONDENT Appellant by Shri Akshat Jain, CA & Shri Rajat Jain, CA Respondent by Shri Mahesh Kumar, CIT DR Date of Hearing 04.06.2025 Date of Pronouncement 28.08.2025 ORDER PER MANISH AGARWAL, AM : The captioned appeals are filed by the…

MANJU RAKESH JAIN,MUMBAI vs. PCIT, MUMBAI-20, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2280/MUM/2025[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Jul 2025AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail () Assessment Year: 2020-21 Manju Rakesh Jain, Pcit, Mumbai-20 704-A, Highland Park, Lokhanwala 418, 4Th Floor, Piramal Chambers, Vs. Complex, Andheri West, Lalbaug, Parel, Mumbai-400058. Mumbai-400012. Pan No. Aaepj 9613 N Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Yadav, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Mr. Rakesh Joshi, CA

Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 263Section 57

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “A” MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) AND SHRI SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL (JUDICIAL MEMBER) Assessment Year: 2020-21 Manju Rakesh Jain, PCIT, Mumbai-20 704-A, Highland Park, Lokhanwala 418, 4th floor, Piramal Chambers, Vs. Complex, Andheri West, Lalbaug, Parel, Mumbai-400058. Mumbai-400012. PAN NO. AAEPJ 9613 N Appellant Respondent : Mr. Rakesh Joshi, CA Assessee by : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Yadav, CIT-DR Revenue by Date of Hearing : 30/07/2025 : 31/07/2025 Date of pronouncement ORDER PER OM PRAKASH KANT, AM This appeal by the assessee is directed aga…

DLF HOME DEVELOPERS LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-1, NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2585/DEL/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 May 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manish Agarwal[Assessment Year : 2019-20] Dlf Home Developers Limited, Vs Pr.Cit, 9Th Floor, Dlf Centre, Sansad Delhi-1, Marg, New Delhi-110001. New Delhi Pan-Aaccd0037H Appellant Respondent Appellant By Shri R.S.Singhvi, Ca & Shri Satyajeet Goel, Ca Respondent By Shri Surender Pal, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 19.03.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 23.05.2025

Section 143(3)Section 263

…ITA No.2585/Del/2024 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI “B” BENCH: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER [Assessment Year : 2019-20] DLF Home Developers Limited, vs Pr.CIT, 9th Floor, DLF Centre, Sansad Delhi-1, Marg, New Delhi-110001. New Delhi PAN-AACCD0037H APPELLANT RESPONDENT Appellant by Shri R.S.Singhvi, CA & Shri Satyajeet Goel, CA Respondent by Shri Surender Pal, CIT DR Date of Hearing 19.03.2025 Date of Pronouncement 23.05.2025 ORDER PER MANISH AGARWAL, AM : The present appeal has been filed by the assessee seeking to assail the order d…

PROPARENT SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,GURGAON vs. PCIT, GURGAON

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 4755/DEL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi12 Apr 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri M.Balaganesh[Assessment Year : 2014-15] M/S. Proparent Solutions Private Ltd., Vs Pcit, Plot No.54, Delta Towers, Sector-44, Gurgaon. Gurgaon, Haryana-122001. Pan-Aagcp5407P Appellant Respondent Appellant By None Respondent By Ms. Nimisha Singh, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 02.04.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 12.04.2024

Section 143(3)Section 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI “F” BENCH: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI KUL BHARAT, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI M.BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER [Assessment Year : 2014-15] M/s. Proparent Solutions Private Ltd., vs PCIT, Plot No.54, Delta Towers, Sector-44, Gurgaon. Gurgaon, Haryana-122001. PAN-AAGCP5407P APPELLANT RESPONDENT Appellant by None Respondent by Ms. Nimisha Singh, CIT DR Date of Hearing 02.04.2024 Date of Pronouncement 12.04.2024 ORDER PER KUL BHARAT, JM : The present appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by Pr.CIT, Gurgaon dated 30.03.2019 for the assessment year 2014-15.…

ASHISH NIRANJAN SHAH,,PUNE vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX -4,, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 697/PUN/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune13 Oct 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.697/Pun/2019 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2014-15 Ashish Niranjan Shah, The Pr.Cit-4, Pune. 39, Mantri Court, Dr.Ambedkar V Road, Next To Rto, Sangam, S Pune – 411001. Pan: Aidps 7682 K Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By Shri Kishor B Phadke – Ar Revenue By Shri Keyur Patel, Irs – Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 28/07/2023 Date Of Pronouncement 13/10/2023 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld.Pr.Commissioner Of Income Tax-4, Pune Dated26.03.2019 Under Section 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal : “1. Learned Pr. Cit- 4, Pune Erred In Law & On Facts In Treating The Assessment Order U/S 143(3) Being Erroneous & Thereby Prejudicial To The Revenue U/S 263 Without Appreciating That, The Learned Ao Has Allowed Appellant'S Claim Of Business Loss Amounting To Rs.10,20,14,068/- Incurred On Account Of Default In Payment By Nsel, With Due Application Of Mind & Verification. The Learned Pr. Cit Erred In Holding That, Ao Has Not Carried Out Any Enquiry With Respect To Business Loss Claimed By The Appellant & Not Applied His Ashish Niranjan Shah [A]

Section 143(3)Section 263Section 43(5)

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ”ए” "ायपीठ पुणेम"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCHES “A” :: PUNE BEFORE SHRI S.S.GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.697/PUN/2019 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2014-15 Ashish Niranjan Shah, The Pr.CIT-4, Pune. 39, Mantri Court, Dr.Ambedkar V Road, Next to RTO, Sangam, s Pune – 411001. PAN: AIDPS 7682 K Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee by Shri Kishor B Phadke – AR Revenue by Shri Keyur Patel, IRS – CIT-DR Date of hearing 28/07/2023 Date of pronouncement 13/10/2023 आदेश/ ORDER PER DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, AM: This…

SHRI BUDHRAJ AGARWAL,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD-43(6) , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed in the legal issue as well as on merit

ITA 431/KOL/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Aug 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Sri Rajesh Kumar & Sonjoy Sarma

Section 143(3)Section 263

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण कोलकाता 'बी' पीठ, कोलकाता में IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA ‘B’ BENCH, KOLKATA श्री राजेश कुमार, लेखा सदस्य एवं श्री संजय शमाा, न्याधयक सदस्य के समक्ष Before SRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No.: 431/KOL/2020 Assessment Year: 2015-16 Shri Budhraj Agarwal.............................................Appellant [PAN: AFBPA 7021 B] Vs. ITO, Ward-43(6), Kolkata [Formerly known as ITO, Ward- 45(2), Kolkata]……………………………………………….Respondent Appearances by: Assessee represented by – Sh. Sunil Surana, FCA. Department represented by – Sh. Abhijit Kundu,…

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE 1(1), RAIPUR vs. M/S R.R. INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED, RAIPUR

ITA 144/RPR/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur11 Jul 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 144/Rpr/2018 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14 The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax-1(1), Raipur (C.G.) .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. M/S. R.R. Industrial Corporation (India) Pvt. Ltd., Station Road, Telghani Naka, Raipur (C.G.) Pan : Aaecr4291B ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Amit M. Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Ila M. Parmar, CIT-DR

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250(4)Section 68

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण "यायपीठ रायपुर म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, RAIPUR BENCH, RAIPUR BEFORE SHRI RAVISH SOOD, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ARUN KHODPIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No. 144/RPR/2018 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14 The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-1(1), Raipur (C.G.) .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/s. M/s. R.R. Industrial Corporation (India) Pvt. Ltd., Station Road, Telghani Naka, Raipur (C.G.) PAN : AAECR4291B ……""यथ" / Respondent Assessee by :Shri Amit M. Jain, Advocate, Revenue by :Smt. Ila M. Parmar, CIT-DR सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date of Hearing :12.04.2023 घो…

M/S. GOVIND STONE PRIVATE LIMITED ,HAMIRPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER -5(4), BANDA

ITA 258/ALLD/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad19 Dec 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shrivijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Shri. R. S. Agrawal, Adv. &VinayGoel, C.AFor Respondent: Shri A.K. Singh Sr.D.R

Section 143Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 56Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ALLAHABAD BENCH, ALLAHABAD BEFORE SHRIVIJAY PAL RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.258/Alld./2018 Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/s. Govind Stone Pvt. Ltd., Income Tax Officer 5(4), 43, 1st Floor, v. Banda, U.P. MohallaMishrana Hamirpur, Distt- Hamirpur, U.P. 210301. PAN:AADCG4838L (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by: Shri. R. S. Agrawal, Adv. &VinayGoel, C.A. Respondent by: Shri A.K. Singh Sr.D.R. Date of hearing: 15.11. 2022 Date of pronouncement: 19.12.2022 O R D E R PER SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: This appeal, filed by assess…

BAREFOOT RESORTS & LEISURES INDIA P LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(2), CHENNAI

ITA 2006/CHNY/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai12 Oct 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.2002 To 2006/Chny/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2008-09 To 2012-13) M/S. Barefoot Resorts & Leisures India Vs The Deputy Commissioner Of Pvt.Ltd. Income Tax, 77/43, 2Nd Floor, Chamiers Road, Corporate Circle-1(2), Chennai-600 028. Chennai-34. Pan: Aaffb 5380B (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/ Appellant By : Mr. S.Sridhar, Advocate ""यथ"क"ओरसे/Respondent By : Mr. P.Sajit Kumar, Jcit सुनवाईक"तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 04.08.2022 घोषणाक"तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 12.10.2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per G. Manjunatha, Am: This Bunch Of Five Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against Common Order Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Chennai Dated 01.06.2018 & Pertain To Assessment Years 2008-09 To 2012- 13. Since, Facts Are Identical & Issues Are Common, For The Sake Of Convenience, These Appeals Were Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Off, By This Consolidated Order.

For Appellant: Mr. S.Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. P.Sajit Kumar, JCIT

Section 147Section 68

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, ‘सी’ "यायपीठ, चे"नई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , ‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI "ी वी.दुगा" राव, "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी जी.मंजुनाथ, लेखा सद"य के सम" BEFORE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.2002 to 2006/Chny/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2008-09 to 2012-13) M/s. Barefoot Resorts & Leisures India Vs The Deputy Commissioner of Pvt.Ltd. Income Tax, 77/43, 2nd floor, Chamiers Road, Corporate Circle-1(2), Chennai-600 028. Chennai-34. PAN: AAFFB 5380B (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/ Appellant by : Mr. S.Sridha…

BAREFOOT RESORTS & LEISURES INDIA P LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(2), CHENNAI

ITA 2005/CHNY/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai12 Oct 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.2002 To 2006/Chny/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2008-09 To 2012-13) M/S. Barefoot Resorts & Leisures India Vs The Deputy Commissioner Of Pvt.Ltd. Income Tax, 77/43, 2Nd Floor, Chamiers Road, Corporate Circle-1(2), Chennai-600 028. Chennai-34. Pan: Aaffb 5380B (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/ Appellant By : Mr. S.Sridhar, Advocate ""यथ"क"ओरसे/Respondent By : Mr. P.Sajit Kumar, Jcit सुनवाईक"तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 04.08.2022 घोषणाक"तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 12.10.2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per G. Manjunatha, Am: This Bunch Of Five Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against Common Order Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Chennai Dated 01.06.2018 & Pertain To Assessment Years 2008-09 To 2012- 13. Since, Facts Are Identical & Issues Are Common, For The Sake Of Convenience, These Appeals Were Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Off, By This Consolidated Order.

For Appellant: Mr. S.Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. P.Sajit Kumar, JCIT

Section 147Section 68

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, ‘सी’ "यायपीठ, चे"नई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , ‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI "ी वी.दुगा" राव, "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी जी.मंजुनाथ, लेखा सद"य के सम" BEFORE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.2002 to 2006/Chny/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2008-09 to 2012-13) M/s. Barefoot Resorts & Leisures India Vs The Deputy Commissioner of Pvt.Ltd. Income Tax, 77/43, 2nd floor, Chamiers Road, Corporate Circle-1(2), Chennai-600 028. Chennai-34. PAN: AAFFB 5380B (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/ Appellant by : Mr. S.Sridha…

BAREFOOT RESORTS & LEISURES INDIA P LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(2), CHENNAI

ITA 2004/CHNY/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai12 Oct 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.2002 To 2006/Chny/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2008-09 To 2012-13) M/S. Barefoot Resorts & Leisures India Vs The Deputy Commissioner Of Pvt.Ltd. Income Tax, 77/43, 2Nd Floor, Chamiers Road, Corporate Circle-1(2), Chennai-600 028. Chennai-34. Pan: Aaffb 5380B (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/ Appellant By : Mr. S.Sridhar, Advocate ""यथ"क"ओरसे/Respondent By : Mr. P.Sajit Kumar, Jcit सुनवाईक"तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 04.08.2022 घोषणाक"तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 12.10.2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per G. Manjunatha, Am: This Bunch Of Five Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against Common Order Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Chennai Dated 01.06.2018 & Pertain To Assessment Years 2008-09 To 2012- 13. Since, Facts Are Identical & Issues Are Common, For The Sake Of Convenience, These Appeals Were Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Off, By This Consolidated Order.

For Appellant: Mr. S.Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. P.Sajit Kumar, JCIT

Section 147Section 68

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, ‘सी’ "यायपीठ, चे"नई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , ‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI "ी वी.दुगा" राव, "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी जी.मंजुनाथ, लेखा सद"य के सम" BEFORE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.2002 to 2006/Chny/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2008-09 to 2012-13) M/s. Barefoot Resorts & Leisures India Vs The Deputy Commissioner of Pvt.Ltd. Income Tax, 77/43, 2nd floor, Chamiers Road, Corporate Circle-1(2), Chennai-600 028. Chennai-34. PAN: AAFFB 5380B (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/ Appellant by : Mr. S.Sridha…

BAREFOOT RESORTS & LEISURES INDIA P LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(2), CHENNAI

ITA 2003/CHNY/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai12 Oct 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.2002 To 2006/Chny/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2008-09 To 2012-13) M/S. Barefoot Resorts & Leisures India Vs The Deputy Commissioner Of Pvt.Ltd. Income Tax, 77/43, 2Nd Floor, Chamiers Road, Corporate Circle-1(2), Chennai-600 028. Chennai-34. Pan: Aaffb 5380B (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/ Appellant By : Mr. S.Sridhar, Advocate ""यथ"क"ओरसे/Respondent By : Mr. P.Sajit Kumar, Jcit सुनवाईक"तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 04.08.2022 घोषणाक"तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 12.10.2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per G. Manjunatha, Am: This Bunch Of Five Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against Common Order Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Chennai Dated 01.06.2018 & Pertain To Assessment Years 2008-09 To 2012- 13. Since, Facts Are Identical & Issues Are Common, For The Sake Of Convenience, These Appeals Were Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Off, By This Consolidated Order.

For Appellant: Mr. S.Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. P.Sajit Kumar, JCIT

Section 147Section 68

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, ‘सी’ "यायपीठ, चे"नई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , ‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI "ी वी.दुगा" राव, "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी जी.मंजुनाथ, लेखा सद"य के सम" BEFORE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.2002 to 2006/Chny/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2008-09 to 2012-13) M/s. Barefoot Resorts & Leisures India Vs The Deputy Commissioner of Pvt.Ltd. Income Tax, 77/43, 2nd floor, Chamiers Road, Corporate Circle-1(2), Chennai-600 028. Chennai-34. PAN: AAFFB 5380B (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/ Appellant by : Mr. S.Sridha…

BAREFOOT RESORTS & LEISURES INDIA P LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(2), CHENNAI

ITA 2002/CHNY/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai12 Oct 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.2002 To 2006/Chny/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2008-09 To 2012-13) M/S. Barefoot Resorts & Leisures India Vs The Deputy Commissioner Of Pvt.Ltd. Income Tax, 77/43, 2Nd Floor, Chamiers Road, Corporate Circle-1(2), Chennai-600 028. Chennai-34. Pan: Aaffb 5380B (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/ Appellant By : Mr. S.Sridhar, Advocate ""यथ"क"ओरसे/Respondent By : Mr. P.Sajit Kumar, Jcit सुनवाईक"तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 04.08.2022 घोषणाक"तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 12.10.2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per G. Manjunatha, Am: This Bunch Of Five Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against Common Order Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Chennai Dated 01.06.2018 & Pertain To Assessment Years 2008-09 To 2012- 13. Since, Facts Are Identical & Issues Are Common, For The Sake Of Convenience, These Appeals Were Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Off, By This Consolidated Order.

For Appellant: Mr. S.Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. P.Sajit Kumar, JCIT

Section 147Section 68

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, ‘सी’ "यायपीठ, चे"नई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , ‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI "ी वी.दुगा" राव, "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी जी.मंजुनाथ, लेखा सद"य के सम" BEFORE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.2002 to 2006/Chny/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2008-09 to 2012-13) M/s. Barefoot Resorts & Leisures India Vs The Deputy Commissioner of Pvt.Ltd. Income Tax, 77/43, 2nd floor, Chamiers Road, Corporate Circle-1(2), Chennai-600 028. Chennai-34. PAN: AAFFB 5380B (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/ Appellant by : Mr. S.Sridha…

SACHIN RAMDAS MOHITE,,SATARA vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX-3,, PUNE

Appeal is allowed in above terms

ITA 395/PUN/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune10 Oct 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Shri G.D. Padmahshali, Am

For Appellant: Shri M.K. KulkarniFor Respondent: Shri Sardar Singh Meena

Section 263Section 37Section 40A(3)Section 69A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH, PUNE BEFORE SHRI S.S. GODARA, JM AND SHRI G.D. PADMAHSHALI, AM I.T.A. No. 395/PUN/2019 : A.Y. 2013-14 Mr. Sachin Ramdas Mohite A/P Khandala, Dist. Satara 415 523 PAN: AMDPM 1310 D : Appellant Vs. The Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax-3, Pune Respondent Appellant by : Shri M.K. Kulkarni Respondent by: Shri Sardar Singh Meena Date of hearing : 04-10-2022 Date of pronouncement : 10-10-2022 ORDER PER SHRI S.S. GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER ; This assessee’s appeal for A.Y. 2013-14 arises against the Pr. CIT-3’s order No. Pn/Pr.CIT/263/MBR/2017-18/5000 dated 06-03-2018, in pr…

KESHAV SARAF,KOLKATA vs. PCIT-15, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 156/KOL/2021[2015-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata25 Aug 2022AY 2015-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

Section 108Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263

…ITA No. 156/KOL/2021 Assessment Year : 2015-2016 Keshav Saraf IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘B’ BENCH, KOLKATA Before Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-President (KZ) & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Accountant Member I.T.A. No. 156/KOL/2021 Assessment Year: 2015-2016 Keshav Saraf,.....................................................................................Appellant Satyanarayan Park, A.C. Market, Upper Basement, D-120, 141, Cotton Street, Kolkata-700007 [PAN: EPLPS7559G] -Vs.- Income Tax Officer,...........................................................................Respondent Ward-43(6), Kolkata, 3, Governm…

SHRI SHAM SUNDER AGGARWAL,KAPURTHALA vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -2 , KAPUTHALA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee, ITA

ITA 410/ASR/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Aug 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. J. S. Bhasin, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Chandrajit Singh, CIT DR

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 151Section 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR BEFORE DR. M. L. MEENA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SH. ANIKESH BANERJEE, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No. 410/Asr/2019 Assessment Year: 2009-10 Sh. Sham Sunder Aggarwal, Vs. Pr. C. I. T.-2, Prop. M/s PK & Company, Jalandhar 15-New Sabji Mandi, Kapurthala [PAN: AAWPA 3347E] (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Sh. J. S. Bhasin, Adv. Respondent by: Sh. Chandrajit Singh, CIT DR Date of Hearing: 29.06.2022 Date of Pronouncement: 24.08.2022 ORDER Per Anikesh Banerjee, J.M.: The instant appeal was filed by the assessee against the order passed by the L…

M/S MAJJU IMAGE & BRAND CONSULTANTS PVT LTD ,BANGALORE vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 2015/BANG/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 Jul 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year : 2014-15 M/S. Majju Image & Brand Consultants Pvt. Ltd., The Pr. No. G1, Accolade Commissioner Of Apartments, Income Tax, Millers Road, 2Nd Cross, Bangalore – 4, Benson Town, Vs. Bangalore. Bangalore – 560 046. Pan: Aaicm6586E Appellant Respondent : Shri B.S. Balachandran, Assessee By Advocate : Shri Sumer Singh Meena, Revenue By Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 14-07-2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 14-07-2022 Order Per Beena Pillaipresent Appeal Is Filed By Assessee Against Order U/S. 263 Dated 25/01/2018 Passed By Ld.Pr.Cit, Bangalore – 4 For A.Y. 2014-15 On Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. The Impugned Revisionary Order Passed By The Learned Principal Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Pcit) U/S.263 Dated; 25-01-2018 Is Opposed To The Facts Of The Case & The Law & Therefore, It Is Liable To Be Set-Aside.

For Respondent: Shri B.S. Balachandran

Section 142(1)Section 143Section 143(3)Section 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2014-15 M/s. Majju Image & Brand Consultants Pvt. Ltd., The Pr. No. G1, Accolade Commissioner of Apartments, Income tax, Millers Road, 2nd Cross, Bangalore – 4, Benson Town, Vs. Bangalore. Bangalore – 560 046. PAN: AAICM6586E APPELLANT RESPONDENT : Shri B.S. Balachandran, Assessee by Advocate : Shri Sumer Singh Meena, Revenue by CIT-DR Date of Hearing : 14-07-2022 Date of Pronouncement : 14-07-2022 ORDER PER BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Present appeal…

LEARNING CURVE EDUTECH SOLUTIONS PVT LTD.,MUMBAI vs. PR CIT-7, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal by the assessee is allowed

ITA 832/MUM/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 May 2022AY 2015-16

Section 115JSection 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 263

…THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” Bench, Mumbai Shri M. Balaganesh (AM) & Mrs. Kavitha Rajagopal (JM) I.T.A. No. 832/Mum/2020 (A.Y. 2015-16) Vs. Principal Learning Curve Edutech Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Commissioner of 301, 3rd Floor, A-Wing Income Tax-7 Mafatlal Chamber Room No. 125 Marathon Futurex I.T. 1st Floor, Aayakar Park, Lower Parel East Bhavan, M.K. Mumbai-400 013. Road Mumbai-400 020. PAN : AACCL1246N (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by Shri Nitesh Joshi Department by Shri Salil Mishra Date of Hearing 30.03.2022 Date of Pronouncement 31.05.2022 O R D E R Per M.Balaganesh (AM) :- This appeal is…

SMT. JYOTI ASHOK KOTECHA vs. C.I.T.-(CENTRAL), NAGPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA

ITA 258/NAG/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune22 Apr 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Shri Bhupendra ShahFor Respondent: Shri J. P. Chadraker

Section 127Section 139Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 263Section 292B

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE BEFORE SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI S. S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Sl. ITA No. Name of Appellant Name of Respondent Asst. No. Year 1 257/NAG/2015 Smt. Meena Dellip CIT (Central), Nagpur 2011-12 Kotecha, 1, Pradhan Apartment, Pratap Nagar, Jalgaon- 425001. PAN : AATPK1231C 2 258/NAG/2015 Smt. Jyoti Ashok CIT (Central), Nagpur 2011-12 Kotecha, 4, Teachers Colony, Ring Road, Jalgaon- 425001. PAN : ALIPK3264H Assessee by : Shri Bhupendra Shah Revenue by : Shri J. P. Chadraker Date of hearing : 17.03.2022 Date of pronouncement : 22.…

Rajmandir Estates (P.) Ltd. v. PCIT

What is Rajmandir Estates (P.) Ltd. v. PCIT authority for?

Also referred to as

Sections most often in play

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Rajmandir Estates (P.) Ltd. v. PCIT

GAURAV KUMAR ARYA,NEW DELHI vs. PCIT -20, NEW DELHI

SURYA ROSHNI LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 7, NEW DELHI

MANJU RAKESH JAIN,MUMBAI vs. PCIT, MUMBAI-20, MUMBAI

DLF HOME DEVELOPERS LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-1, NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI

PROPARENT SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,GURGAON vs. PCIT, GURGAON

ASHISH NIRANJAN SHAH,,PUNE vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX -4,, PUNE

SHRI BUDHRAJ AGARWAL,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD-43(6) , KOLKATA

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE 1(1), RAIPUR vs. M/S R.R. INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED, RAIPUR

M/S. GOVIND STONE PRIVATE LIMITED ,HAMIRPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER -5(4), BANDA

BAREFOOT RESORTS & LEISURES INDIA P LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(2), CHENNAI

BAREFOOT RESORTS & LEISURES INDIA P LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(2), CHENNAI

BAREFOOT RESORTS & LEISURES INDIA P LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(2), CHENNAI

BAREFOOT RESORTS & LEISURES INDIA P LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(2), CHENNAI

BAREFOOT RESORTS & LEISURES INDIA P LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(2), CHENNAI

SACHIN RAMDAS MOHITE,,SATARA vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX-3,, PUNE

KESHAV SARAF,KOLKATA vs. PCIT-15, KOLKATA

SHRI SHAM SUNDER AGGARWAL,KAPURTHALA vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -2 , KAPUTHALA

M/S MAJJU IMAGE & BRAND CONSULTANTS PVT LTD ,BANGALORE vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , BANGALORE

LEARNING CURVE EDUTECH SOLUTIONS PVT LTD.,MUMBAI vs. PR CIT-7, MUMBAI

SMT. JYOTI ASHOK KOTECHA vs. C.I.T.-(CENTRAL), NAGPUR