Rajkot) 5. Sharp Tools v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax

421 ITR 90High Court2020#9806 most cited
11

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2024 to 2024.

Sections most often in play

Section 153CSection 143(3)Section 153ASection 132Section 147Section 132(4)Section 131(1A)Section 143(1)

Issues it is cited on

section 158bb(1)retraction of statementsection 158bbsection 131(1a)section 153c(1)section 34section 292bblock periodadmission of additional evidencesection 153bsection 132(1)section 158b

Judgments citing Rajkot) 5. Sharp Tools v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax

RAJENDRA KUMAR MEENA,GANGAPUR vs. ITO WARD-2 SAWAMADHOPUR, GANGAPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 516/JPR/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur25 Jul 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Shrawan Kumar Gupta, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Rajesh Kumar Meena (Addl. CIT)
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 2(14)Section 234A

…the interpretation given by the High Court to Section 153C of the Act is in terms of the aforesaid law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court. the Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of Sharp Tools v. Principal Commissioner of Income-tax reported in [2020] 421 ITR 90 (Mad) particularly paragraphs 22 to 26 which are relevant and are quoted as hereunder: “22. It is contended by the learned counsel appearing for the Revenue by that exercise of power and granting the relief to the assessee under section 264 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, is subject to the provision of the Income-tax Act and therefore, the assessee…

JOHN DISTILLERIES PVT LTD.,,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), BANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 987/BANG/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore24 Jul 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Keshav Dubey

…suance to the provisions of section 43B on payment basis is available. Accordingly, we set aside the finding of the learned CIT-A and direct the AO to delete the addition made by him. Hence, the ground of appeal of the assessee is allowed.” 20.27 Sharp Tools (421 ITR 90), Hon’ble Madras High Court held as under: 8. Heard both sides and perused the materials placed before this Court. 9. The petitioner is an Assessee under the respondent-Department. For the assessment year 2013-2014, the petitioner filed their return on 30.09.2013. While filling up the columns therein, the petitioner, in Column No.14, under the hea…

JOHN DISTILLERIES PVT LTD.,,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), BANGALORE

ITA 986/BANG/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore24 Jul 2024AY 2015-16
For Appellant: Sri T.M. Shivakumar

…ce to the\nprovisions of section 43B on payment basis is available. Accordingly, we set aside\nthe finding of the learned CIT-A and direct the AO to delete the addition made by\nhim. Hence, the ground of appeal of the assessee is allowed.”\n20.27 Sharp Tools (421 ITR 90), Hon’ble Madras High Court\nheld as under:\n8. Heard both sides and perused the materials placed before this Court.\n9. The petitioner is an Assessee under the respondent-Department. For the\n assessment year 2013-2014, the petitioner filed their return on 30.09.2013.\nWhile filling up the columns therein, the petitioner, in Column No.14, under\n…

JOHN DISTILLERIES PVT LTD.,,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, BANGALORE

ITA 983/BANG/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore24 Jul 2024AY 2012-13

…ce to the\nprovisions of section 43B on payment basis is available. Accordingly, we set aside\nthe finding of the learned CIT-A and direct the AO to delete the addition made by\nhim. Hence, the ground of appeal of the assessee is allowed.”\n20.27 Sharp Tools (421 ITR 90), Hon’ble Madras High Court\nheld as under:\n8. Heard both sides and perused the materials placed before this Court.\n9. The petitioner is an Assessee under the respondent-Department. For the\n assessment year 2013-2014, the petitioner filed their return on 30.09.2013.\nWhile filling up the columns therein, the petitioner, in Column No.14, under\n…

JOHN DEVELOPERS ,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), BANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 847/BANG/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore24 Jul 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Keshav Dubey

…suance to the provisions of section 43B on payment basis is available. Accordingly, we set aside the finding of the learned CIT-A and direct the AO to delete the addition made by him. Hence, the ground of appeal of the assessee is allowed.” 20.27 Sharp Tools (421 ITR 90), Hon’ble Madras High Court held as under: 8. Heard both sides and perused the materials placed before this Court. 9. The petitioner is an Assessee under the respondent-Department. For the assessment year 2013-2014, the petitioner filed their return on 30.09.2013. While filling up the columns therein, the petitioner, in Column No.14, under the hea…

JOHN DEVELOPERS ,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), BANGALORE

ITA 846/BANG/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore24 Jul 2024AY 2015-16

…M/s. Paul Plathotathil John ITA Nos.845 to 847/Bang/2023 M/s. John Developers, Bangalore , ITA Nos.961, 962, 982 to 987 & 1012/Bang/2023 M/s. John Distilleries Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore Page 35 of 147 5. Sharp Tools vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (2020) 421 ITR 90 (HC-Madras) B. 132(4) Statement per se is not an incriminating material - : For this proposition, he relied on the following judgements:- 1. CIT v. Harjeev Aggarwal, 2016 (2016) 290 CTR 263l (2016) 229 DLT 33, ITA 8 of 2004 (HC, Delhi) 2. CIT vs. Kuber Khadyan Pvt. Ltd., 2021 ITA No.4223/4225/4226/Del/2018 (ITAT, New Delhi) C. No addition without…

JOHN DEVELOPERS,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), BANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 845/BANG/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore24 Jul 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Keshav Dubey

…suance to the provisions of section 43B on payment basis is available. Accordingly, we set aside the finding of the learned CIT-A and direct the AO to delete the addition made by him. Hence, the ground of appeal of the assessee is allowed.” 20.27 Sharp Tools (421 ITR 90), Hon’ble Madras High Court held as under: 8. Heard both sides and perused the materials placed before this Court. 9. The petitioner is an Assessee under the respondent-Department. For the assessment year 2013-2014, the petitioner filed their return on 30.09.2013. While filling up the columns therein, the petitioner, in Column No.14, under the hea…

M/S. PAUL RESORTS & HOTELS PVT LTD,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), BANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 841/BANG/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore24 Jul 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Keshav Dubey

…suance to the provisions of section 43B on payment basis is available. Accordingly, we set aside the finding of the learned CIT-A and direct the AO to delete the addition made by him. Hence, the ground of appeal of the assessee is allowed.” 20.27 Sharp Tools (421 ITR 90), Hon’ble Madras High Court held as under: 8. Heard both sides and perused the materials placed before this Court. 9. The petitioner is an Assessee under the respondent-Department. For the assessment year 2013-2014, the petitioner filed their return on 30.09.2013. While filling up the columns therein, the petitioner, in Column No.14, under the hea…

M/S. PAUL RESORTS & HOTELS PVT LTD,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1) , BANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 840/BANG/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore24 Jul 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Keshav Dubey

…suance to the provisions of section 43B on payment basis is available. Accordingly, we set aside the finding of the learned CIT-A and direct the AO to delete the addition made by him. Hence, the ground of appeal of the assessee is allowed.” 20.27 Sharp Tools (421 ITR 90), Hon’ble Madras High Court held as under: 8. Heard both sides and perused the materials placed before this Court. 9. The petitioner is an Assessee under the respondent-Department. For the assessment year 2013-2014, the petitioner filed their return on 30.09.2013. While filling up the columns therein, the petitioner, in Column No.14, under the hea…

M/S. PAUL RESORTS & HOTELS PVT LTD ,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), BANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 839/BANG/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore24 Jul 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Keshav Dubey

…suance to the provisions of section 43B on payment basis is available. Accordingly, we set aside the finding of the learned CIT-A and direct the AO to delete the addition made by him. Hence, the ground of appeal of the assessee is allowed.” 20.27 Sharp Tools (421 ITR 90), Hon’ble Madras High Court held as under: 8. Heard both sides and perused the materials placed before this Court. 9. The petitioner is an Assessee under the respondent-Department. For the assessment year 2013-2014, the petitioner filed their return on 30.09.2013. While filling up the columns therein, the petitioner, in Column No.14, under the hea…

M/S. PAUL RESORTS & HOTELS PVT. LTD.,,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), BANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 838/BANG/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore24 Jul 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Keshav Dubey

…suance to the provisions of section 43B on payment basis is available. Accordingly, we set aside the finding of the learned CIT-A and direct the AO to delete the addition made by him. Hence, the ground of appeal of the assessee is allowed.” 20.27 Sharp Tools (421 ITR 90), Hon’ble Madras High Court held as under: 8. Heard both sides and perused the materials placed before this Court. 9. The petitioner is an Assessee under the respondent-Department. For the assessment year 2013-2014, the petitioner filed their return on 30.09.2013. While filling up the columns therein, the petitioner, in Column No.14, under the hea…

Rajkot) 5. Sharp Tools v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (421 ITR 90) — Cited in 11 Judgments | BharatTax