What is Quepem Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. v. ACIT authority for?

A cooperative bank is considered a cooperative society for the purposes of Section 80P, allowing other cooperative societies to claim a deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) for interest income derived from investments made in such cooperative banks.

Which sections of the Income Tax Act does Quepem Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. v. ACIT come up under?

It is most often cited in judgments turning on Section 80P(2)(a)(i), Section 80P(2)(d), Section 80P(4), Section 143(3), Section 80P, Section 56.

Quepem Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. v. ACIT (377 ITR 272)

Q: How many judgments cite Quepem Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. v. ACIT?

60 judgments on BharatTax cite Quepem Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. v. ACIT (377 ITR 272), spanning 2016 to 2026.

RAMCHANDRADADA KAWADE PUNYA NAGARI NAGARI SAHAKARI PAT SANSTHA MARYADIT,PUNE vs. ITO 7(1), PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 379/PUN/2026[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Pune17 Apr 2026AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Judicialmember I T A. No..379/Pun/2026 (A.Y.2017-18) Vs Ramchandradadakawade I.T.O.Ward 7(1), Punyanagarinagarisahakrai Aayakarsadan, . Pat Sanstha Maryadit, Bodhi Tower, S.No.66 Media Park, 548/2B, B T Kawade Road., Salasbury Park, Ghorpadi, Pune -411011 Pune-411037, Maharashtra. Maharashtra. Pan.No.Aaaap5734H (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) Assesseeby Shri.Rajendrakadrekar&Siddheshwarhadi,Ar Revenue By Shri.Amitbobde, Cit Dr सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing 08.04.2026 17.04.2026 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement Order Per Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm: The Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac) Delhi / Cit(A) Passed U/Sec143(3)R.W.S 263 & 250 Of The Act. The Assesse Has Raised The Grounds Of Appeal Challenging The Order Of The Nfac/Cit(A) Sustaining The Denial Of Claim Of Deduction U/Sec 80P(2)(A)(I) Of The Act & Without Prejudice To Alternate/Obtaining Relief On Interest Income Earned On Deposits With The Co-Operative Banks. 2. The Brief Facts Of The Case Are That, The Assessee Is A Co- Operative Society Registered Under Maharashtra Societies

Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 80

…Nos.379/PUN/2026 RamchandradadaKawadePunyaNagari NagariSahakrai Pat SansthaMaryadit preferred by the Revenue, relying upon its earlier decision in the case of Quepem Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT [2015] 58 taxmann.com 113/232 Taxman 510/377 ITR 272 (Bom.), the Revenue has preferred the present appeal. 2. The High Court considered the following question of law - "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal is justified as claimed by the assessee on the ground that the assessee, a co-operative credit society and is not a bank for the purpose of Section 8…

SHREE SANT SAVTA GRAMIN BIGAR SETI SAHAKARI PATSANSTHA MARYADIT,PIMPALGAON vs. ASSESSING OFFICER, NASHIK

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 1597/PUN/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Pune11 Feb 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr.Dipak P. Ripote & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपऩल सं. / Ita No.1597/Pun/2025 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year: 2016-17 Shree Sant Savta Gramin Bigar V Assessment Unit, Seti Sahakari Patsanstha S Income Tax Maryadit, Department, Delhi. Pimpalgaon, Niphad, Maharashtra – 422209. Pan: Aacas4098M Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By Shri Sanket Joshi (Virtual) Revenue By Shri Sadananda – Jcit Date Of Hearing 10/02/2026 Date Of Pronouncement 11/02/2026 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeal)[Nfac], Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 For The A.Y.2016-17 Dated 27.11.2024 Emanating From The Assessment Order Passed Under Section 144 Of The I.T.Act, Dated 05.03.2024. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal :

Section 144Section 148Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 271FSection 56Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…t Bombay in ITA No. 933/2017, by which the High Court has dismissed the said appeal preferred by the Revenue, relying upon its earlier decision in the case of Quepem Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT [2015] 58 taxmann.com 113/232 Taxman 510/377 ITR 272 (Bom .), the Revenue has preferred the present appeal. 2. The High Court considered the following question of law "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal is justified as claimed by the assessee on the ground that the assessee, a co-operative credit society and is not a bank for the purpose of Section…

AURANGABAD DIVISION LIFE INSURANCE EMPLOYEES CO-OP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD,AURANBAD vs. ITO, WARD-1(1), AURANGABAD, AURANGABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3175/PUN/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Pune10 Feb 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Dr.Dipak P. Ripote & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपऩल सं. / Ita No.3175/Pun/2025 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year: 2020-21 Aurangabad Divison Life V The Income Tax Officer, Insurance Employees Co-Op S Ward-1(1), Aurangabad. Credit Society Ltd., 11, Jeevan Prakash, Lic Office Building Adalat Road, Kranti Chowk, Aurangabad -431005 Pan: Aaaaa2245A Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By Ca Payal Rathi (Virtual) Revenue By Shri Sadananda – Jcit Date Of Hearing 09/02/2026 Date Of Pronouncement 10/02/2026 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeal)[Nfac], Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 For The A.Y.2020-21 Dated 24.09.2025 Emanating From The Assessment Order Passed Under Section 143(3) Read With Section 144B Of The Income Tax Act, 1961

Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 250Section 56Section 66Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

…Bombay in ITA No. 933/2017, by which the High Court has dismissed the said appeal preferred by the Revenue, relying upon its earlier decision in the case of Quepem Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. 7 v. Asstt. CIT [2015] 58 taxmann.com 113/232 Taxman 510/377 ITR 272 ITA No.3175/PUN/2025 [A] (Bom .), the Revenue has preferred the present appeal. 2. The High Court considered the following question of law "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal is justified as claimed by the assessee on the ground that the assessee, a co-operative credit society and is not a bank fo…

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 SATARA, SATARA vs. KARAD PATAN TALUKA PRATHMIK SHIKSHAK SAHAKARI SOCIETY LIMITEDTY , KARAD

In the result, Revenue’s Appeal is dismissed

ITA 2289/PUN/2025[2020]Status: DisposedITAT Pune23 Jan 2026

Bench: Dr.Dipak P. Ripote & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपऩल सं. / Ita No.2289/Pun/2025 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year: 2020-21 Income Tax Officer, V Karad Patan Taluka Prathmik Ward-1, Satara. S Shikshak Sahakari Society Limited, 190 B Shaniwar Peth, Opp.Shivneri Lodge, Karad, Satara – 415110 Pan: Aaaak0559R Appellant / Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee By Shri Satish U Nade Revenue By Smt Neha Thakur (Virtual) Date Of Hearing 21/01/2026 Date Of Pronouncement 23/01/2026 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Revenue Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeal)[Nfac], Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 For A.Y.2020-21 Dated 21.08.2025 Emanating From The Assessment Order Passed Under Section 143(3) Read With Section 144B Of The I.T .Act, 1961 Dated

Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 250Section 56Section 57Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…t Bombay in ITA No. 933/2017, by which the High Court has dismissed the said appeal preferred by the Revenue, relying upon its earlier decision in the case of Quepem Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT [2015] 58 taxmann.com 113/232 Taxman 510/377 ITR 272 ( Bom .), the Revenue has preferred the present appeal. 2. The High Court considered the following question of law "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal is justified as claimed by the assessee on the ground that the assessee, a co-operative credit society and is not a bank for the purpose of Section…

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2, AHMEDNAGAR, AHAMEDNAGAR vs. KANIFNATH GRMAIN BIGAR SHETI SAHAKARIPATSANSTHA MARYADIT, , MALDAD

In the result, Revenue’s Appeal is dismissed

ITA 2271/PUN/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Jan 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr.Dipak P. Ripote & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपऩल सं. / Ita Nos.2270 & 2271/Pun/2025 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year: 2018-19 The Income Tax Officer, V Kanifnath Gramin Bigar Sheti Ward-2, Ahmednagar. S Sahakaripatsanstha Maryadit, At Post Malad, Taluka Sangamner, Ahmednagar – 422608. Pan: Aabak1395E Appellant/ Revenue Respondent /Assessee Assessee By Shri Pramod S Shingte – Ar Revenue By Smt Neha Thakkar (Virtual) Date Of Hearing 19/01/2026 Date Of Pronouncement 21/01/2026 आदेश/ Order Per Bench : These Two Appeals Filed By The Revenue Against The Separate Orders Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeal)[Nfac],Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 For A.Y.2018- 19Dated 01.07.2025 Emanating From The Assessment Order Dated 30.03.2021 Under Section 143(3) R.W.S. 143(3A) & 143(3B) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 & Order Under Section 250 Of The Income

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 270ASection 56Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)

…t Bombay in ITA No. 933/2017, by which the High Court has dismissed the said appeal preferred by the Revenue, relying upon its earlier decision in the case of Quepem Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT [2015] 58 taxmann.com 113/232 Taxman 510/377 ITR 272 ( Bom .), the Revenue has preferred the present appeal. 2. The High Court considered the following question of law 11 ITA Nos.2270 & 2271/PUN/2025 [D] "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal is justified as claimed by the assessee on the ground that the assessee, a co-operative credit society and is…

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2, AHMEDNAGAR, AHMEDNAGAR vs. KANIFNATH GRMAIN BIGAR SHETI SAHAKARI, MALDAD SANGAMNER

In the result, Revenue’s Appeal is dismissed

ITA 2270/PUN/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Jan 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr.Dipak P. Ripote & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपऩल सं. / Ita Nos.2270 & 2271/Pun/2025 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year: 2018-19 The Income Tax Officer, V Kanifnath Gramin Bigar Sheti Ward-2, Ahmednagar. S Sahakaripatsanstha Maryadit, At Post Malad, Taluka Sangamner, Ahmednagar – 422608. Pan: Aabak1395E Appellant/ Revenue Respondent /Assessee Assessee By Shri Pramod S Shingte – Ar Revenue By Smt Neha Thakkar (Virtual) Date Of Hearing 19/01/2026 Date Of Pronouncement 21/01/2026 आदेश/ Order Per Bench : These Two Appeals Filed By The Revenue Against The Separate Orders Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeal)[Nfac],Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 For A.Y.2018- 19Dated 01.07.2025 Emanating From The Assessment Order Dated 30.03.2021 Under Section 143(3) R.W.S. 143(3A) & 143(3B) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 & Order Under Section 250 Of The Income

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 270ASection 56Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)

…t Bombay in ITA No. 933/2017, by which the High Court has dismissed the said appeal preferred by the Revenue, relying upon its earlier decision in the case of Quepem Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT [2015] 58 taxmann.com 113/232 Taxman 510/377 ITR 272 ( Bom .), the Revenue has preferred the present appeal. 2. The High Court considered the following question of law 11 ITA Nos.2270 & 2271/PUN/2025 [D] "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal is justified as claimed by the assessee on the ground that the assessee, a co-operative credit society and is…

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 5,SANGLI., SANGLI. vs. SHREE GANESH NAGARI SAHAKARI PAT SANSTHA MARYADIT, ASHTA,, ASHTA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2375/PUN/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune06 Jan 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.2375/Pun/2025 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 Ito, Ward-5, Sangli. Vs. Shree Ganesh Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha Maryadit, Ashta, Tal. Walwa, Dist. Sangli, Sangli- 416301. Pan : Aaaas8248R Appellant Respondent C. O. No.49/Pun/2025 (Arising Out Of Ita No.2375/Pun/2025) िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 Shree Ganesh Nagari Vs. Ito, Ward-5, Sangli. Sahakari Pat Sanstha Maryadit, Ashta, Tal. Walwa, Dist. Sangli, Sangli- 416301. Pan : Aaaas8248R Appellant Respondent Revenue By : Shri Umesh Phade Assessee By : Shri Sarang Gudhate Date Of Hearing : 25.11.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 06.01.2026 आदेश / Order Per Vinay Bhamore, Jm: This Appeal Filed By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Dated 05.08.2025 Passed By Ld. Cit(A)/Nfac For The Assessment

For Appellant: Shri Sarang GudhateFor Respondent: Shri Umesh Phade

Section 143(3)Section 28Section 36(1)(va)Section 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(d)

…t Bombay in ITA No. 933/2017, by which the High Court has dismissed the said appeal preferred by the Revenue, relying upon its earlier decision in the case of Quepem Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT [2015] 58 taxmann.com 113/232 Taxman 510/377 ITR 272 (Bom.), the Revenue has preferred the present appeal. 2. The High Court considered the following question of law - "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal is justified as claimed by the assessee on the ground that the assessee, a co-operative credit society and is not a bank for the purpose of Section 8…

PREMIUM TOWER CO OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY,MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD 24(3)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 2436/MUM/2025[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Nov 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain

Section 250Section 80Section 80P(2)(d)

…nt activities.] 7. Thus, assessee being a cooperative society cannot be reckoned as cooperative bank carrying out banking business. The Hon’ble Jurisdictional High court in the case of Quepem Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. vs. ACIT reported in (2015) 377 ITR 272 (Bom), after analyzing the relevant provision of Section 80P including Sub-section (4) had categorically held that cooperative banks are to be treated as cooperative society. In so far as deduction of interest earned on investment made in cooperative bank, Clause (d) of section 80P(2) provides that any income by way of interest on dividend derive…

SHIV SAGAR BUSINESS PREMISES CO OP SOC. LTD ,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 22(3)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 3104/MUM/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Jul 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL (Accountant Member)

Section 143(1)Section 2Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…ent activities.] 7. Thus, assessee being a cooperative society cannot be reckoned as cooperative bank carrying out banking business. The Hon’ble Jurisdictional High court in the case of Quepem Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. vs. ACIT reported in (2015) 377 ITR 272 (Bom), after analyzing the relevant provision of Section 80P including Sub-section (4) had categorically held that cooperative banks are to be treated as cooperative society. In so far as deduction of interest earned on investment made in cooperative bank, Clause (d) of section 80P(2) provides that any income by way of interest on dividend derive…

MARATHWADA NAGARI SAHAKARI PATH SANSTHA MARYADIT,KALYAN vs. ASSESSING OFFICER, WARD 1(1), KALYAN

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3346/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Jul 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal & Shri Prabhash Shankarmarathwada Nagari Sahakari V/S. Assessing Officer, Ward – Path Sanstha Maryadit, बनाम 1(1), Mohan Plaza, Wayle Shop No. 06, 1St Floor, Nagar, Khadakpada, Kalyan Dhamnikar Plaza, Bhiwandi, – 421301, Maharashtra Thane – 421302, Maharashtra स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No: Aaaam9150E Appellant/अपीलार्थी .. Respondent/प्रतिवादी

For Appellant: Shri Sushant Alme, ARFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Perampurna, (CIT- DR)

Section 143(3)Section 263Section 56Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…t of his submission, the ld. AR of the assessee relied upon the following decisions:  Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd. vs. CIT [2000] 243 ITR 83(SC),  CIT vs. Max India Ltd. [2007] 295 ITR 282 (SC),  Quepem Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. vs. ACIT [2015] 377 ITR 272 (Bom. HC).  PCIT vs. Goa PWD Staff Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. [2016] 242 Taxman 0422 (Bom. HC.)  CIT vs. Gabriel India Ltd. [1993] 203 ITR 108 (Bom.)  CIT vs. Jafari Momin Vikash Co-op. Credit Society Ltd. [2014] 362 ITR 331 (Guj. HC.  ACIT vs. Metrocity Criminal Courts employees Mutually Aided co- op. Credit Society Ltd. [2015] 39 ITR…

VEEJ COMPANY SEVAKANCHI SAHAKARI PATH SANSTHA LTD.,KALYAN vs. ASSESSING OFFICER, WARD 3(1), KALYAN

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3341/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Jul 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal & Shri Prabhash Shankarveej Company Sevakanchi V/S. Assessing Officer, Ward – Sahakari Path Sanstha बनाम 3(1), Rani Mansion, 2Nd Ltd.,Shramik Sahakar, Usha Floor, Kalyan Murbad Road, Sankul Valiper Road, Oak Thane - 421 301, Baug, Thane - 421301, Maharashtra Maharashtra स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No: Aaaam2266M Appellant/अपीलार्थी .. Respondent/प्रतिवादी

For Appellant: Shri Sushant Alme,ARFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Perampurna (CIT - DR)

Section 143(3)Section 263Section 56Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)

…t of his submission, the ld. AR of the assessee relied upon the following decisions:  Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd. vs. CIT [2000] 243 ITR 83(SC),  CIT vs. Max India Ltd. [2007] 295 ITR 282 (SC),  Quepem Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. vs. ACIT [2015] 377 ITR 272 (Bom. HC).  PCIT vs. Goa PWD Staff Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. [2016] 242 Taxman 0422 (Bom. HC.)  CIT vs. Gabriel India Ltd. [1993] 203 ITR 108 (Bom.)  CIT vs. Jafari Momin Vikash Co-op. Credit Society Ltd. [2014] 362 ITR 331 (Guj. HC.  ACIT vs. Metrocity Criminal Courts employees Mutually Aided co- op. Credit Society Ltd. [2015] 39 ITR…

PREMIUM TOWER COOP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO, WARD 24(3(3), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 38/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Feb 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), MS. PADMAVATHY S (Accountant Member)

Section 143(3)Section 2Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)

…ent activities.] 7. Thus, assessee being a cooperative society cannot be reckoned as cooperative bank carrying out banking business. The Hon’ble Jurisdictional High court in the case of Quepem Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. vs. ACIT reported in (2015) 377 ITR 272 (Bom), after analyzing the relevant provision of Section 80P including Sub-section (4) had categorically held that cooperative banks are to be treated as 5 Premium Tower Co-op Housing Society Ltd. cooperative society. In so far as deduction of interest earned on investment made in cooperative bank, Clause (d) of section 80P(2) provides that any i…

ITO, MUMBAI vs. THE CENTRAL RAILWAY EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed in the above terms

ITA 2783/MUM/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai11 Nov 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri. Narendra Kumar Billaiya & Shri. Raj Kumar Chauhan & & Ito, Mumbai Vs. The Central Railway Lower Parel, 306, Piramal Employees Co-Operative Chamber, Mumbai – 400012. Credit Society Ltd. 665-A, The Creccs Society, N.M. Joshi Marg, Byculla (West), Mumbai – 400027. Pan: Aaatt3547K (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

…icature at Bombay in ITA No.933/2017, by which the High Court has dismissed the said appeal preferred by the Revenue, relying upon its earlier decision in the case of M/s. Quepem Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, 377 ITR 272, the Revenue has preferred the present appeal. ITA No. 2692/Mum/2024; A.Y. 2017-18 & ITA No. 2693/Mum/2024; A.Y. 2018-19 & ITA No. 2783/Mum/2024; A.Y. 2020-21 The Central Railway Employees Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. 2. The High Court considered the following question of law – “Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in…

I.T.O, MUMBAI vs. THE CENTRAL RAILWAY EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD. , MUMBAI

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed in the above terms

ITA 2693/MUM/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai11 Nov 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri. Narendra Kumar Billaiya & Shri. Raj Kumar Chauhan & & Ito, Mumbai Vs. The Central Railway Lower Parel, 306, Piramal Employees Co-Operative Chamber, Mumbai – 400012. Credit Society Ltd. 665-A, The Creccs Society, N.M. Joshi Marg, Byculla (West), Mumbai – 400027. Pan: Aaatt3547K (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

…icature at Bombay in ITA No.933/2017, by which the High Court has dismissed the said appeal preferred by the Revenue, relying upon its earlier decision in the case of M/s. Quepem Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, 377 ITR 272, the Revenue has preferred the present appeal. ITA No. 2692/Mum/2024; A.Y. 2017-18 & ITA No. 2693/Mum/2024; A.Y. 2018-19 & ITA No. 2783/Mum/2024; A.Y. 2020-21 The Central Railway Employees Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. 2. The High Court considered the following question of law – “Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in…

I.T.O., MUMBAI vs. THE CENTRAL RAILWAY EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed in the above terms

ITA 2692/MUM/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai11 Nov 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri. Narendra Kumar Billaiya & Shri. Raj Kumar Chauhan & & Ito, Mumbai Vs. The Central Railway Lower Parel, 306, Piramal Employees Co-Operative Chamber, Mumbai – 400012. Credit Society Ltd. 665-A, The Creccs Society, N.M. Joshi Marg, Byculla (West), Mumbai – 400027. Pan: Aaatt3547K (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

…icature at Bombay in ITA No.933/2017, by which the High Court has dismissed the said appeal preferred by the Revenue, relying upon its earlier decision in the case of M/s. Quepem Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, 377 ITR 272, the Revenue has preferred the present appeal. ITA No. 2692/Mum/2024; A.Y. 2017-18 & ITA No. 2693/Mum/2024; A.Y. 2018-19 & ITA No. 2783/Mum/2024; A.Y. 2020-21 The Central Railway Employees Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. 2. The High Court considered the following question of law – “Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in…

UNITED SHANTI KUTEER CO. OP. HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-17(2)(1), KAUTILYA BHAVAN

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 4371/MUM/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Oct 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI OMKARESHWAR CHIDARA (Accountant Member)

Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 2Section 4Section 56Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(d)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘H(SMC)’ BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI OMKARESHWAR CHIDARA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER United Shanti Kuteer Vs. Income Tax Officer- Co-operative Housing 17(2)(1) Society Limited Kautilya Bhavan 215, Shanti Kuteer Bandra Kurla Complex Netaji Subhash Road Mumbai – 400 051 Mumbai – 400 020 PAN/GIR No.AAAAU0699L (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Assessee by Shri Jigar Mehta, CA Revenue by Shri Uodal Raj Singh, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 17/10/2024 Date of Pronouncement 30/10/2024 आदेश / O R D E R PER AMIT SHUKLA (J.M): The aforesaid appeal has been filed by the a…

BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED ,KALYAN vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , NATIONAL E ASSESSMENT CENTRE DELHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1293/MUM/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member)

Section 143(3)Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘B‘ BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI OMKARESHWAR CHIDARA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Bharat Sanchar Nigam Vs. Income Tax Officer, Employees Co-operative National E-Assessment Credit Society Limited Centre Kalyan Telephone Delhi Exchange Kala Talao Kalyan West-421 301 Maharashtra PAN/GIR No.AAAAK8119K (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Assessee by Shri Shekhar Patwardhan Revenue by Shri Ashok Kumar Ambastha Date of Hearing 12/06/2024 Date of Pronouncement 29/08/2024 आदेश / O R D E R PER AMIT SHUKLA (J.M): The aforesaid appeal has been filed by the assessee a…

INCOME TAX OFFICER, ASHER IT PARK, WAGLE ESTATE, THANE vs. THANE JILLHA PRATHAMIK SIKSHAK SAHAKARI PATPEDHI LTD, THANE

Accordingly, all the ground raised by the Revenue in appeal for the Assessment Year 2020-21 are dismissed

ITA 3434/MUM/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Aug 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri P.D. ChouguleFor Respondent: Shri Subodh Ratnaparikh

Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 80(2)(d)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)

…ature at Bombay in ITA No. 933/2017, by which the High Court has dismissed the said appeal preferred by the Revenue, relying upon its earlier decision in the case of M/s. Quepem Urban Co- operative Credit Society Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, 377 ITR 272, the Revenue has preferred the present appeal. The High Court considered the following question of law- "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal is justified as claimed by the assessee on the ground that the assessee, a co-operative credit society and is not a bank for the purpose of Section 80P(4) of th…

INCOME TAX OFFICER, ASHAR IT PARK,THANE vs. THANE JILLHA PRATHAMIK SIKSHAK SAHAKARI PATPEDHI LTD, WAGLE ESTATE,THANE

Accordingly, all the ground raised by the Revenue in appeal for the Assessment Year 2020-21 are dismissed

ITA 3433/MUM/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Aug 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri P.D. ChouguleFor Respondent: Shri Subodh Ratnaparikh

Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 80(2)(d)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)

…ature at Bombay in ITA No. 933/2017, by which the High Court has dismissed the said appeal preferred by the Revenue, relying upon its earlier decision in the case of M/s. Quepem Urban Co- operative Credit Society Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, 377 ITR 272, the Revenue has preferred the present appeal. The High Court considered the following question of law- "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal is justified as claimed by the assessee on the ground that the assessee, a co-operative credit society and is not a bank for the purpose of Section 80P(4) of th…

SHRIRAM SAHAKARI PATPEDHI LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ITO-20(3)(3), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 615/MUM/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai26 Jul 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayassessment Year: 2014-15 Shriram Sahakari Ito-20(3)(3) Patpedhi Limited Room No. 614, Room No.4, Piramal Chembers, Bomanji House, Lal Baug, Vs. Ground Floor, Parel, Copper Smith Road, Mumbai- 400012. Mazgaon, Mumbai- 400010. Pan: Aanfs3097G (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For : Assessee By : Shri Vinay Shinde, A.R. Revenue By : Shri R. R. Makwana- Sr. D.R.

For Appellant: Shri Vinay Shinde, A.RFor Respondent: Shri R. R. Makwana- SR. D.R

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 4Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…ivil Appeal No.8314 of 2019. B. Hon. Mumbai High Court: Jurisdictional High Court :- a. Commissioner of Income Tax-22 Vs. Shri Kulswami Co-op. Credit society Ltd.: b. M/s. Quepem Urban Co-Operative Credit Society Ltd. vs. Assistant commissioner of Income Tax, 377 ITR 272 and the decision in Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Goa vs. Goa PWD Staff Co-op. Credit Society Ltd. (2016) 242 Taxman 422. C. Some ITAT Decisions allowing Deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) to Co- Operative Societies: 6 Shriram Sahakari Patpedhi Limited i. Vitthal Co-Operative Credit Society Ltd vs. CIT(A)-26, ITAT, Mumbai Bench 'SMC' Mumbai, ITA No…

Quepem Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. v. ACIT

What is Quepem Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. v. ACIT authority for?

Also referred to as

Also reported as

Sections most often in play

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Quepem Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. v. ACIT

RAMCHANDRADADA KAWADE PUNYA NAGARI NAGARI SAHAKARI PAT SANSTHA MARYADIT,PUNE vs. ITO 7(1), PUNE

SHREE SANT SAVTA GRAMIN BIGAR SETI SAHAKARI PATSANSTHA MARYADIT,PIMPALGAON vs. ASSESSING OFFICER, NASHIK

AURANGABAD DIVISION LIFE INSURANCE EMPLOYEES CO-OP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD,AURANBAD vs. ITO, WARD-1(1), AURANGABAD, AURANGABAD

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 SATARA, SATARA vs. KARAD PATAN TALUKA PRATHMIK SHIKSHAK SAHAKARI SOCIETY LIMITEDTY , KARAD

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2, AHMEDNAGAR, AHAMEDNAGAR vs. KANIFNATH GRMAIN BIGAR SHETI SAHAKARIPATSANSTHA MARYADIT, , MALDAD

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2, AHMEDNAGAR, AHMEDNAGAR vs. KANIFNATH GRMAIN BIGAR SHETI SAHAKARI, MALDAD SANGAMNER

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 5,SANGLI., SANGLI. vs. SHREE GANESH NAGARI SAHAKARI PAT SANSTHA MARYADIT, ASHTA,, ASHTA

PREMIUM TOWER CO OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY,MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD 24(3)(1), MUMBAI

SHIV SAGAR BUSINESS PREMISES CO OP SOC. LTD ,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 22(3)(1), MUMBAI

MARATHWADA NAGARI SAHAKARI PATH SANSTHA MARYADIT,KALYAN vs. ASSESSING OFFICER, WARD 1(1), KALYAN

VEEJ COMPANY SEVAKANCHI SAHAKARI PATH SANSTHA LTD.,KALYAN vs. ASSESSING OFFICER, WARD 3(1), KALYAN

PREMIUM TOWER COOP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO, WARD 24(3(3), MUMBAI

ITO, MUMBAI vs. THE CENTRAL RAILWAY EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD., MUMBAI

I.T.O, MUMBAI vs. THE CENTRAL RAILWAY EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD. , MUMBAI

I.T.O., MUMBAI vs. THE CENTRAL RAILWAY EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD., MUMBAI

UNITED SHANTI KUTEER CO. OP. HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-17(2)(1), KAUTILYA BHAVAN

BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED ,KALYAN vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , NATIONAL E ASSESSMENT CENTRE DELHI

INCOME TAX OFFICER, ASHER IT PARK, WAGLE ESTATE, THANE vs. THANE JILLHA PRATHAMIK SIKSHAK SAHAKARI PATPEDHI LTD, THANE

INCOME TAX OFFICER, ASHAR IT PARK,THANE vs. THANE JILLHA PRATHAMIK SIKSHAK SAHAKARI PATPEDHI LTD, WAGLE ESTATE,THANE

SHRIRAM SAHAKARI PATPEDHI LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ITO-20(3)(3), MUMBAI