Qamar Shaffi Tyabji v. The Commissioner, Excess Profit Tax, Hydrabad (39 ITR 611)

Q: What is Qamar Shaffi Tyabji v. The Commissioner, Excess Profit Tax, Hydrabad authority for?

An agency relationship does not require a formal contract and can be implied from the parties' actions or the circumstances they are in. This principle was affirmed in the context of the relationship between airlines and travel agents.

Q: How many judgments cite Qamar Shaffi Tyabji v. The Commissioner, Excess Profit Tax, Hydrabad?

32 judgments on BharatTax cite Qamar Shaffi Tyabji v. The Commissioner, Excess Profit Tax, Hydrabad (39 ITR 611), spanning 2009 to 2019.

DCIT, New Delhi vs. M/S. Sistema Shyam Teleservices Ltd., New Delhi

Appeals are allowed and the judgment of the Tribunal on this aspect is set aside

ITA 5083/DEL/2013[2010-11 (F.Y.- 2009-10)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 May 2019

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K.N.Charydcit, Vs. Sistema Shyam Teleservices Circle-5(1), Ltd, New Delhi A-60, Naraina Industrial Area, Phase-I, New Delhi Pan: Aaccs1709H (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Alok Vasant, CAFor Respondent: Shri N.K. Bansal, Sr. DR

Section 194HSection 201

…ubject to the limits to his authority prescribed by the principal (See Lakshminarayan Ram Gopal and Son Ltd. v. Page No : 0163 Government of Hyderabad [1954] 25 ITR 449 (SC) at pages 456-457. This cited with the approval in Qamar Shaffi Tyabji v. CEPT [1960] 39 ITR 611 (SC) at pages 615, 616. (iv) There is no necessity of a formal contract of agency, it can be implied which could arise from the act of parties or situations in which parties are put." 24. At this stage itself, we may point out that in the aforesaid case, this court held relationship between the Airlines and the travel agents as that of "principal…

Ngc Network Asia Llc, Mumbai vs. Jdit (It) RG 4, Mumbai

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 7631/MUM/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Dec 2015AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri B.R.Baskaran (Am) & Amit Shukla, (Jm) सर्वश्री बी.आर.बास्करन, ऱेखा सदस्य एवं अमित शुक्ऱा, न्याययक सदस्य के समक्ष आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.7994/Mum/2011 & Ita No.7631/Mum/2012 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Year :2007-08 & 2008-09) बनाम/ Ngc Network Asia Llc, Joint Director Of Income Tax C/O S R Batliboi & Co., (International Taxation), Vs. 14Th Floor, The Ruby, Range-4, Senapati Bapat Marg, Scindia House, Tulsi Pipe Road, Ballard Estate, Dadar (W), Mumbai-400038. Mumbai-400028 (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. स्थधमी रेखध सं./जीआइआय सं./Pan: Aabcn3136G अऩीरधथी ओय से / Appellant By Shri Porus Kaka & Ms.Sheetal Shah प्रत्मथी की ओय से/Rspondent By Ms.Vandana Sagar सुनवधई की तधयीख / Date Of Hearing : 4.9.2015 घोषणध की तधयीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 16.12.2015 आदेश / O R D E R Per B.R. Baskaran (Am) These Are The Two Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Assessment Orders Passed For Assessment Years 2007-08 & 2008-09 In Pursuance Of Directions Issued By The Dispute Resolution Panel (Drp). Since Issues Urged In These Two Appeals Are Identical In Nature, They Are Being Disposed Of By This Common Order, For The Sake Of Convenience.

Section 9(1)(vi)

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, म ुंबई न्यायपीठ “एऱ” म ुंबई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “L” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE S/SHRI B.R.BASKARAN (AM) AND AMIT SHUKLA, (JM) सर्वश्री बी.आर.बास्करन, ऱेखा सदस्य एवं अमित शुक्ऱा, न्याययक सदस्य के समक्ष आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.7994/Mum/2011 And ITA No.7631/Mum/2012 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Year :2007-08 and 2008-09) बनाम/ NGC Network Asia LLC, Joint Director of Income Tax C/o S R Batliboi and Co., (International Taxation), Vs. 14th floor, The Ruby, Range-4, Senapati Bapat Marg, Scindia House, Tulsi Pipe road, Ballard Estate, Dadar (W), Mumbai-400038. Mumbai-400028 (अऩीरधथी /Appellant…