Principal Commissioner of Income Tax v. R.G. Buildwell Engineers Ltd.

259 Taxmann 370Supreme Court of India2018#9830 most cited
11

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2021 to 2026.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Principal Commissioner of Income Tax v. R.G. Buildwell Engineers Ltd.

BASANTI AUTO AGENCY,BALASORE vs. ACIT, CIRCLE BALASORE, BALASORE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 109/CTK/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack26 Jun 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rajesh Kumarआयकर अऩीऱ सं/Ita No.109/Ctk/2023 (ननधाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2017-2018) Basanti Auto Agency, Vs Acit, Circle-Balasore, Balasore Remuna Golai, Po/Ps: Januganj, Dist: Balasore-756019 Pan No. :Aajts 1630 D (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri P.K.Mishra, Advocate राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 26/06/2023 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 26/06/2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi, Dated 31.01.2023, Passed In Din & Oder No.Itba/Nfac/S/250/2022- 23/1049270091(1), For The Assessment Year 2017-2018. 2. It Was Submitted By The Ld. Ar Of The Assessee That Two Issues Have Been Raised In The Appeal, One Against The Disallowance Made By Invoking Provisions U/S.40(A)(Ia) Of The Act On The Ground Of Non-Deduction Of Tds U/S.194C. The Second Issue Was Against The Adhoc Disallowance Of 15% Expenses Under Different Heads Totaling To Rs.2,13,330/-. It Was The Submission That In View Of The Decision Of The Hon’Ble Supreme Court In The Case Of R.G.Buildwell Engineers Ltd., 259 Taxman 370 As The Books Of Accounts Have Not Been Rejected, No Adhoc Disallowance Can Be Made.

For Appellant: Shri P.K.Mishra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr. DR
Section 194CSection 40

…आयकर अऩीऱीय अधधकरण, कटक न्यायऩीठ,कटक IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK BENCH CUTTACK श्री जाजज माथन, न्याययक सदस्य एवं श्री राजेश कुमार, ऱेखा सदस्य के समक्ष । (THROUGH VIRTUAL HEARING) BEFORE SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अऩीऱ सं/ITA No.109/CTK/2023 (ननधाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2017-2018) Basanti Auto Agency, Vs ACIT, Circle-Balasore, Balasore Remuna Golai, PO/PS: Januganj, Dist: Balasore-756019 PAN No. :AAJTS 1630 D (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee by : Shri P.K.Mishra, Advocate राजस्व की ओर से /Reven…

LOTUS ORNAMENTS PVT LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT 10(2)(1), MUMBAI

The appeal stand partly allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 679/MUM/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai01 Oct 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am (Hearing Through Video Conferencing Mode) आयकरअपील सं./ I.T.A. No. 679/Mum/2020 (धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2013-14) M/S Lotus Ornaments Pvt. Ltd. Acit – 10(2)(1) Unit No. 78, Sdf-Iii, Seepz Aaykar Bhavan बिाम/ Vs. Sez, Andheri(E), M. K. Road Mumbai-400 096 Mumbai-400 020 स्थायीलेखासं./ जीआइआरसं./ Pan/Gir No. Aaacl-9830-C (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) : Assessee By : Shri Gaurav Bansal – Ld. Ar Revenue By : Shri Brajendra Kumar – Ld. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/ : 28/09/2021 Date Of Hearing घोषणा की तारीख / : 01/10/2021 Date Of Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal () 1. Aforesaid Appeal By Assessee For Assessment Year (Ay) 2013-14 Arises Out Of The Order Of Learned Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals)-10, Mumbai [Cit(A)], Dated 11/12/2019 In The Matter Of Assessment Framed By Learned Assessing Officer (Ao) U/S 143(3) On 25/03/2016. The Impugned Order Has Confirmed Disallowance U/S 14A As Well As Adhoc Disallowance Of Labour / Assortment Charges As Made By Ld. Ao In The Assessment Order. Ground No.1 Has Not Been Pressed

For Appellant: Shri Gaurav Bansal – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Brajendra Kumar – Ld. DR
Section 143(3)Section 14A

…1 आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण “ए” न्यायपीठ म ुंबई में। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, MUMBAI माननीय श्री विकास अिस्थी, न्यावयक सदस्य एवं माननीय श्री मनोज कुमार अग्रवाल ,लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JM AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM (Hearing through Video Conferencing Mode) आयकरअपील सं./ I.T.A. No. 679/Mum/2020 (धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2013-14) M/s Lotus Ornaments Pvt. Ltd. ACIT – 10(2)(1) Unit No. 78, SDF-III, SEEPZ Aaykar Bhavan बिाम/ Vs. SEZ, Andheri(E), M. K. Road Mumbai-400 096 Mumbai-400 020 स्थायीलेखासं./ जीआइआरसं./ PAN/GIR No. AAACL-9830-C (अपीलाथी/App…