Principal CIT v. Vaishnodevi Refoils & Solvex
96 Taxmann.com 469Supreme Court of India2018#2501 most cited
What is Principal CIT v. Vaishnodevi Refoils & Solvex authority for?
For an addition under Section 68 concerning capital introduction by a partner, the assessee is not required to prove the source of funds of the immediate creditor or lender. The Supreme Court affirmed this principle, limiting the assessee's onus to establishing identity, genuineness, and the creditor's immediate creditworthiness.
47
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2026.
Also referred to as
Pr CIT v Vaishnodevi Refoils & Solvex · 96 Taxmann.com 469 · Section 68 · source of source · onus of proof · creditworthiness of creditor · capital introduction by partner · unexplained cash credit · Supreme Court · SLP dismissed
Sections most often in play
Issues it is cited on
Judgments citing Principal CIT v. Vaishnodevi Refoils & Solvex
Showing 1–20 of 47 · Page 1 of 3