Pradip Kumar Malhotra v. CIT
106 TTJ 250Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2007#4124 most cited
What is Pradip Kumar Malhotra v. CIT authority for?
A debit balance arising from advances paid during the ordinary course of business, for business expediencies, does not constitute a loan or advance that falls within the definition of deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e).
28
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2025.
Also referred to as
Pradip Kumar Malhotra v. CIT · section 2(22)(e) · deemed dividend · loan or advance · business expediency · ordinary course of business · shareholder benefit · ITAT
Issues it is cited on
Judgments citing Pradip Kumar Malhotra v. CIT
Showing 1–20 of 28 · Page 1 of 2