Bhagwati Steel Processors, Chandigarh vs. PCIT, Chandigarh
In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is allowed
ITA 435/CHANDI/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh15 Jul 2025AY 2021-22
For Appellant: Shri T.N. Singla, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 263
…rder does not mean lack of inquiry. Ο Nirav Modi [390 ITR 292 (Bom)), Shashi Bhushan Gupta [202 TTJ UO 30], Delhi Airport Metro Express [398 ITR 8], Fine Jewellery (India) Ltd. [372 ITR 303], Jyoti Foundation [357 ITR 388], Brahma Centre Development (P) Ltd. [437 ITR 285], among others, reiterate that once inquiry is made and a possible view taken by the AO, the same cannot be revised under Section 263 unless the PCIT undertakes fresh verification and demonstrates how the AO's conclusion is erroneous and prejudicial. 6. The Ld. CIT-DR supported the revision order, contending that the AO had failed to verify key i…