Pr. CIT v. Laxmiraj 11 Bogus

410 ITR 495High Court2019#2575 most cited

What is Pr. CIT v. Laxmiraj 11 Bogus authority for?

For initiating reassessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer is not required to have conclusive evidence that income has escaped assessment. A 'reason to believe' based on fresh facts or information, such as from the Sales Tax Department regarding bogus purchases or accommodation entries, is sufficient, provided it establishes a link to the escapement of income.

45

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2024.

Also referred to as

Pr. CIT v. Laxmiraj 11 Bogus · 410 ITR 495 · reassessment initiation · reason to believe · escapement of income · conclusive evidence · bogus purchases · accommodation entries · Section 147 · Section 148 · Gujarat High Court

Judgments citing Pr. CIT v. Laxmiraj 11 Bogus

Showing 120 of 45 · Page 1 of 3

Pr. CIT v. Laxmiraj 11 Bogus (410 ITR 495) — Cited in 45 Judgments | BharatTax