ANSHU PRITHANI,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-15, NEW DEDLHI
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 1153/DEL/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 Jul 2021AY 2008-09
Bench: Sh. Amit Shukladr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 1153/Del/2018 : Asstt. Year: 2008-09 Anshu Prithani, Vs Dcit, Brahmaputra House, A-7, Central Circle-17, Mahipalur, New Delhi-110037 New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Akdpp5664L Assessee By : None Revenue By : Sh. Satpal Gulati, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 14.07.2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 14 .07.2021
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. Satpal Gulati, CIT DR
Section 132Section 132ASection 139(1)Section 153(3)Section 153ASection 153A(1)
…(Delhi) CIT Vs. Lancy Constructions [2016] 237 Taxman 728 (Karnataka). DCIT Vs. Kurele Paper Mills Pvt. Ltd. in ITA No.3761/Del/2011. Pr.CIT vs. Kurele Paper Mills Pvt. Ltd. in ITA No.369/2015 (Del HC). Pr. CIT VS. Kurele Paper Mills Pvt. Ltd. [2016] 380 ITR 65 (SC) 3 Anshu Prithani CIT Vs. Saumya Construction P. Ltd. [2016] 387 ITR 529 (Guj) 6. On the other hand, the ld. DR though could not controvert the contention that there is no incriminating material found at the time of search, but he submitted that, once notice u/s 153(3) is issued to the assessee then it is incumbent upon the assessee to fil…