Pr. CIT v. Gahoi Foods Pvt. Ltd.

117 Taxmann.com 118Supreme Court of India2020#2175 most cited
53

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2021 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Pr. CIT v. Gahoi Foods Pvt. Ltd. · Gahoi Foods · Section 153A · search assessment additions · seized materials · incriminating material · SLP accepted · Supreme Court pending · finality of issue

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Pr. CIT v. Gahoi Foods Pvt. Ltd.

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADURAI vs. M/S INDUSTRIAL MINERAL CO., 100% EOU, TUTICORIN

In the result, the assessee’s appeal ITA No

ITA 529/CHNY/2023[2012]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 May 2025

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm 1. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.390/Chny/2023 (िनधा(रण वष( / Assessment Year: 2012-13) M/S. Industrial Mineral Co. 100% Eou Acit बनाम/ 1/1C, Harbour Express Highway, Central Circle-(1), Vs. Thermal Nagar So, Tuticorin-628 006. Madurai "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Tan No. Aaafi-9714-R (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) & 2. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.529/Chny/2023 (िनधा(रण वष( / Assessment Year: 2012-13) Acit M/S. Industrial Mineral Co. 100% Eou बनाम/ Central Circle-(1), 1/1C, Harbour Express Highway, Vs. Madurai Thermal Nagar So, Tuticorin 628006 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Tan No. Aaafi-9714-R (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से/ Assessee By : Shri N. Arjun Raj (Advocate) – Ld.Ar ""थ" की ओर से/Revenue By : Shri R. Clement Ramesh Kumar (Cit) -Ld. Dr सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 26-02-2025 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 21-05-2025 आदेश / O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri N. Arjun Raj (Advocate) – Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri R. Clement Ramesh Kumar (CIT) -Ld. DR
Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153A(1)Section 69B

…A) erred in failing to appreciate that on the issue of addition to be made in the assessments framed u/s.153A on the basis of seized materials, the SLP filed by the Revenue has been accepted the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Pr.CIT Vs Gahoi Foods Pvt Ltd (117 Taxmann.com 118) and is still pending, thus the issue has not attained finality. 3.3 The Ld.CIT(A) erred in failing to appreciate that there is no express provision in the Act that the additions made in the search assessment can be made only on the basis of incriminating seized materials. 3.4 The Ld.CIT(A) erred in deleting the disallowance of Rs.42,68,9…

INDUSTRIAL MINERAL CO, 100%EOU,TUTICORIN vs. ACIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, MADURAI, MADURAI

In the result, the assessee’s appeal ITA No

ITA 390/CHNY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 May 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm 1. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.390/Chny/2023 (िनधा(रण वष( / Assessment Year: 2012-13) M/S. Industrial Mineral Co. 100% Eou Acit बनाम/ 1/1C, Harbour Express Highway, Central Circle-(1), Vs. Thermal Nagar So, Tuticorin-628 006. Madurai "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Tan No. Aaafi-9714-R (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) & 2. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.529/Chny/2023 (िनधा(रण वष( / Assessment Year: 2012-13) Acit M/S. Industrial Mineral Co. 100% Eou बनाम/ Central Circle-(1), 1/1C, Harbour Express Highway, Vs. Madurai Thermal Nagar So, Tuticorin 628006 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Tan No. Aaafi-9714-R (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से/ Assessee By : Shri N. Arjun Raj (Advocate) – Ld.Ar ""थ" की ओर से/Revenue By : Shri R. Clement Ramesh Kumar (Cit) -Ld. Dr सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 26-02-2025 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 21-05-2025 आदेश / O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri N. Arjun Raj (Advocate) – Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri R. Clement Ramesh Kumar (CIT) -Ld. DR
Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153A(1)Section 69B

…A) erred in failing to appreciate that on the issue of addition to be made in the assessments framed u/s.153A on the basis of seized materials, the SLP filed by the Revenue has been accepted the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Pr.CIT Vs Gahoi Foods Pvt Ltd (117 Taxmann.com 118) and is still pending, thus the issue has not attained finality. 3.3 The Ld.CIT(A) erred in failing to appreciate that there is no express provision in the Act that the additions made in the search assessment can be made only on the basis of incriminating seized materials. 3.4 The Ld.CIT(A) erred in deleting the disallowance of Rs.42,68,9…

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(4), , CHENNAI vs. M/S. MAVIS SATCOM LIMITED, CHENNAI

The appeals of the Revenue are dismissed being devoid of merit'

ITA 739/CHNY/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Oct 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./I.T.As.406, 407 & 739/Chny/2023. िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years :2012-2013, 2013-2014 & 2011-2012. The Deputy Commissioner Of M/S. Mavis Satcom Ltd, Income Tax, Vs. No.48, Np, Jawaharlal Nehru Road, Central Circle 2(4) Ekattutangal, Investigation Building, Chennai 600 032. Chennai 600 034. [Pan Aaccm 2127K] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Respondent: Shri. T.D. Sanjay Kandiar, C.A
Section 143(3)Section 148Section 154Section 32(1)

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ‘बी, "यायपीठ, चे"ई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘B’ BENCH : CHENNAI "ी महावीर िसंह,उपा"" एवं "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल,लेखा सद" के सम" BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENTAND SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./I.T.As.406, 407 & 739/CHNY/2023. िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment years :2012-2013, 2013-2014 & 2011-2012. The Deputy Commissioner of M/s. Mavis Satcom Ltd, Income Tax, Vs. No.48, NP, Jawaharlal Nehru Road, Central Circle 2(4) Ekattutangal, Investigation Building, Chennai 600 032. Chennai 600 034. [PAN AACCM 2127K] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : Shri.…

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(4), CHENNAI vs. M/S MAVIS SATCOM LTD, EKATTUTANGAL CHENNAI

The appeals of the Revenue are dismissed being devoid of merit'

ITA 407/CHNY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Oct 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./I.T.As.406, 407 & 739/Chny/2023. िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years :2012-2013, 2013-2014 & 2011-2012. The Deputy Commissioner Of M/S. Mavis Satcom Ltd, Income Tax, Vs. No.48, Np, Jawaharlal Nehru Road, Central Circle 2(4) Ekattutangal, Investigation Building, Chennai 600 032. Chennai 600 034. [Pan Aaccm 2127K] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Respondent: Shri. T.D. Sanjay Kandiar, C.A
Section 143(3)Section 148Section 154Section 32(1)

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ‘बी, "यायपीठ, चे"ई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘B’ BENCH : CHENNAI "ी महावीर िसंह,उपा"" एवं "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल,लेखा सद" के सम" BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENTAND SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./I.T.As.406, 407 & 739/CHNY/2023. िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment years :2012-2013, 2013-2014 & 2011-2012. The Deputy Commissioner of M/s. Mavis Satcom Ltd, Income Tax, Vs. No.48, NP, Jawaharlal Nehru Road, Central Circle 2(4) Ekattutangal, Investigation Building, Chennai 600 032. Chennai 600 034. [PAN AACCM 2127K] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : Shri.…

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(4), CHENNAI , CHENNAI vs. M/S MAVIS SATCOM LTD, EKATTUTANGAL CHENNAI

The appeals of the Revenue are dismissed being devoid of merit'

ITA 406/CHNY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Oct 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./I.T.As.406, 407 & 739/Chny/2023. िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years :2012-2013, 2013-2014 & 2011-2012. The Deputy Commissioner Of M/S. Mavis Satcom Ltd, Income Tax, Vs. No.48, Np, Jawaharlal Nehru Road, Central Circle 2(4) Ekattutangal, Investigation Building, Chennai 600 032. Chennai 600 034. [Pan Aaccm 2127K] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Respondent: Shri. T.D. Sanjay Kandiar, C.A
Section 143(3)Section 148Section 154Section 32(1)

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ‘बी, "यायपीठ, चे"ई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘B’ BENCH : CHENNAI "ी महावीर िसंह,उपा"" एवं "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल,लेखा सद" के सम" BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENTAND SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./I.T.As.406, 407 & 739/CHNY/2023. िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment years :2012-2013, 2013-2014 & 2011-2012. The Deputy Commissioner of M/s. Mavis Satcom Ltd, Income Tax, Vs. No.48, NP, Jawaharlal Nehru Road, Central Circle 2(4) Ekattutangal, Investigation Building, Chennai 600 032. Chennai 600 034. [PAN AACCM 2127K] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : Shri.…

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, TUTICORIN vs. VVD & SONS (P) LIMITED, TUTICORIN

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 2152/CHNY/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.2150, 2151 & 2152/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13 The Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. M/S. Vvd & Sons (P) Limited, Income Tax, No. 182, Palayamkottai Road, Central Circle 2, Tuticorin 628 008. Madurai. [Pan:Aaacv8438J] (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By Shri R. Clement Ramesh Kumar, Cit For : Shri M. Rajan, Cit ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By Shri R. Vijayaraghavan, Advocate : सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing 24.08.2023 : घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 13.09.2023 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao: These Three Appeals Filed By The Revenue Are Directed Against The Common Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 19, Chennai, Dated 16.04.2018 Relevant To The Assessment Years 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13. 2. The Appeals Filed By The Revenue Are Delayed By Three Days, For Which, The Revenue Has Filed Affidavits For Condonation Of Delay, To Which The Ld. Counsel For The Assessee Has Not Raised Any Serious Objection.

…erred in failing to appreciate that on the issue of addition to be made in the assessments framed u/s.153A on the basis of seized materials, the SLP filed by the Revenue has been accepted the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Pr. CIT Vs. Gahoi Foods Pvt. Ltd (117 Taxmann.com 118) and is still pending, thus the issue has not attained finality. 1.3 The ld. CIT(A) erred in failing to appreciate that there is no express provision in the Act that the additions made in the search assessment can be made only on the basis of seized materials. 5. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee, M/s. VVD and Sons (P) Limited…

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, TUTICORIN vs. VVD & SONS (P) LIMITED, TUTICORIN

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 2151/CHNY/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Sept 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.2150, 2151 & 2152/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13 The Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. M/S. Vvd & Sons (P) Limited, Income Tax, No. 182, Palayamkottai Road, Central Circle 2, Tuticorin 628 008. Madurai. [Pan:Aaacv8438J] (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By Shri R. Clement Ramesh Kumar, Cit For : Shri M. Rajan, Cit ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By Shri R. Vijayaraghavan, Advocate : सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing 24.08.2023 : घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 13.09.2023 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao: These Three Appeals Filed By The Revenue Are Directed Against The Common Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 19, Chennai, Dated 16.04.2018 Relevant To The Assessment Years 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13. 2. The Appeals Filed By The Revenue Are Delayed By Three Days, For Which, The Revenue Has Filed Affidavits For Condonation Of Delay, To Which The Ld. Counsel For The Assessee Has Not Raised Any Serious Objection.

…erred in failing to appreciate that on the issue of addition to be made in the assessments framed u/s.153A on the basis of seized materials, the SLP filed by the Revenue has been accepted the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Pr. CIT Vs. Gahoi Foods Pvt. Ltd (117 Taxmann.com 118) and is still pending, thus the issue has not attained finality. 1.3 The ld. CIT(A) erred in failing to appreciate that there is no express provision in the Act that the additions made in the search assessment can be made only on the basis of seized materials. 5. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee, M/s. VVD and Sons (P) Limited…

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, TUTICORIN vs. VVD & SONS (P) LIMITED, TUTICORIN

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 2150/CHNY/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Sept 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.2150, 2151 & 2152/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13 The Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. M/S. Vvd & Sons (P) Limited, Income Tax, No. 182, Palayamkottai Road, Central Circle 2, Tuticorin 628 008. Madurai. [Pan:Aaacv8438J] (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By Shri R. Clement Ramesh Kumar, Cit For : Shri M. Rajan, Cit ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By Shri R. Vijayaraghavan, Advocate : सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing 24.08.2023 : घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 13.09.2023 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao: These Three Appeals Filed By The Revenue Are Directed Against The Common Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 19, Chennai, Dated 16.04.2018 Relevant To The Assessment Years 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13. 2. The Appeals Filed By The Revenue Are Delayed By Three Days, For Which, The Revenue Has Filed Affidavits For Condonation Of Delay, To Which The Ld. Counsel For The Assessee Has Not Raised Any Serious Objection.

…erred in failing to appreciate that on the issue of addition to be made in the assessments framed u/s.153A on the basis of seized materials, the SLP filed by the Revenue has been accepted the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Pr. CIT Vs. Gahoi Foods Pvt. Ltd (117 Taxmann.com 118) and is still pending, thus the issue has not attained finality. 1.3 The ld. CIT(A) erred in failing to appreciate that there is no express provision in the Act that the additions made in the search assessment can be made only on the basis of seized materials. 5. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee, M/s. VVD and Sons (P) Limited…

Showing 120 of 53 · Page 1 of 3