Pr. CIT v. Chain House International (P) Ltd.
What is Pr. CIT v. Chain House International (P) Ltd. authority for?
The Supreme Court dismissed the revenue's Special Leave Petition, upholding that additions for cash credits, specifically share application money, cannot be made under Section 68 based on mere doubts or suspicion. Once the assessee discharges its primary onus to prove the identity, genuineness, and creditworthiness of the creditors, the burden shifts back to the Assessing Officer to bring concrete evidence of wrongdoing.
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2025.
Also referred to as
Pr. CIT v. Chain House International (P) Ltd. · 103 Taxmann.com 435 · Section 68 · cash credits · share application money · onus of proof · identity genuineness creditworthiness · mere doubts suspicion · dismissal of SLP
Sections most often in play
Issues it is cited on
Judgments citing Pr. CIT v. Chain House International (P) Ltd.
Showing 1–20 of 59 · Page 1 of 3