Pr. CIT v. Avantha Realty Ltd.

164 Taxmann.com 376High Court2024#3346 most cited

What is Pr. CIT v. Avantha Realty Ltd. authority for?

Amendments made to Section 14A by the Finance Act, 2022, inserting a non-obstante clause and an explanation, are prospective from April 1, 2022, and cannot be applied retrospectively. Further, where no exempt income is earned, Section 14A read with Rule 8D cannot be applied.

35

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2024 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Pr. CIT v. Avantha Realty Ltd. · Section 14A · Rule 8D · Finance Act 2022 amendment · prospective amendment · no exempt income · disallowance under section 14a · clarificatory amendment

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Pr. CIT v. Avantha Realty Ltd.

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ROURKELA vs. B.R. SPONGE AND POWER LIMITED, ROURKELA

In the result, appeal of the revenue stands dismissed

ITA 376/CTK/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack22 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rajesh Kumarआयकर अपील सं/Ita No.376/Ctk/2024 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2017-2018) Acit, Rourkela Vs B.R Sponge & Power Limited C-11,1St Floor,Mariden Tower, Udit Nagar,Rourkela, 769012 Pan No. : Aaccb 4089 K (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) नििााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Kamal Agarwal, Ar राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Vijay Singh, Sr. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 22/09/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 22/09/2025

For Appellant: Shri Kamal Agarwal, ARFor Respondent: Shri Vijay Singh, Sr. DR
Section 14A

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, कटक न्यायपीठ,कटक IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK BENCH CUTTACK (THROUGH VIRTUAL HEARING) श्री जाजज माथन, न्याययक सदस्य एवं श्री राजेश कुमार, लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष । BEFORE SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं/ITA No.376/CTK/2024 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2017-2018) ACIT, Rourkela Vs B.R Sponge and Power Limited C-11,1st Floor,Mariden Tower, Udit Nagar,Rourkela, 769012 PAN No. : AACCB 4089 K (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) नििााररती की ओर से /Assessee by : Shri Kamal Agarwal, AR राजस्व की ओर से /Revenu…

ASHOK LEYLAND LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT NON CORP CIRCLE 8(1) LTU - II, CHENNAI

ITA 1402/CHNY/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai07 Jul 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1402/Chny/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Year: 2019-20 M/S. Ashok Leyland Ltd., No.1, Sardar Patel Road, Guindy, Chennai-600 032. [Pan: Aaaса 4651 L] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) V. The Dcit, Ncc-8(1), Ltu-Ii, Chennai. (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1663/Chny/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Year: 2019-20 The Dcit, Ncc-8, Chennai. (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) V. M/S. Ashok Leyland Ltd., No.1, Sardar Patel Road, Guindy, Chennai-600 032. [Pan: Aaaса 4651 L] (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) Assessee By : Mr.R. Vijayaraghavan, Advocate Department By : Ms.Ann Marry Baby, Cit सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 04.06.2025 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 07.07.2025 आदेश / Order Per Aby T. Varkey, Jm: These Are Cross-Appeals Preferred By The Assessee As Well As The Revenue Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax

For Appellant: Mr.R. Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms.Ann Marry Baby, CIT
Section 14ASection 92C

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, 'डी' न्यायपीठ, चेन्नई। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL 'D' BENCH: CHENNAI श्री एबी टी. वर्की, न्यायिक सदस्य एवं श्री अमिताभ शुक्ला, लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष BEFORE SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI AMITABH SHUKLA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.1402/Chny/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Year: 2019-20 M/s. Ashok Leyland Ltd., No.1, Sardar Patel Road, Guindy, Chennai-600 032. [PAN: AAAСА 4651 L] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) v. The DCIT, NCC-8(1), LTU-II, Chennai. (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.1663/Chny/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Year: 2019-20 The DCIT, NCC-8, Chennai.…

Showing 120 of 35 · Page 1 of 2

Pr. CIT v. Avantha Realty Ltd. (164 Taxmann.com 376) — Cited in 35 Judgments | BharatTax