Harshvardhan Constructions, Mumbai vs. ITO 23(1)(5), Mumbai
ITA 5225/MUM/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai09 Jul 2020AY 2011-12
Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Ravish Soodharshvardhan Constructions Income Tax Officer 11, Happy Home, 244 Waterfield Road; Ward 23(1)(5), 1St Floor, Vs. Bandra West, Mumbai – 400 050. Matru Mandir, Tardeo Road, Mumbai – 400 007. Pan– Aadfh6590D (Appellant) (Respondent) Income Tax Officer Vs. Harshvardhan Construvctions Ward 23(1)(5), 1St Floor , 11, Happy Home, 244 Waterfield Road; Matru Mandir, Tardeo Road, Bandra West, Mumbai – 400 050. Mumbai – 400 007. Pan– Aadfh6590D Harshvardhan Constructions Income Tax Officer 11, Happy Home, 244 Waterfield Road; Ward 23(1)(5), 1St Floor, Vs. Bandra West, Mumbai – 400 050. Matru Mandir, Tardeo Road, Mumbai – 400 007. Pan– Aadfh6590D
For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Joshi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri S.C Tiwari, CIT D.R
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 80I
…ear, then benefits, which are not available under the section cannot be conferred by ignoring or misinterpreting the words in the section. Adopting a similar view, the Hon‘ble Apex Court in the case of Petron Engg. Construction Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CBDT &Ors. (1989) 175 ITR 523 (SC), had earlier observed, that liberal interpretation of an incentive provision can be resorted to only when it is possible Harshvardhan Constructions Vs. ITO, 23(1)(5), Mumbai – ITA No.5225/Mum/2017 & ITA No. 4730/Mum/2016 – A.Y 2011-12 & 2012-13 48 ITO, Ward 23(1)(5), Mumbai Vs. Harshvardhan Constructions – ITA No. 5912/Mum/2017, ITA No. 552…