PCIT v. Zydus Wellness Ltd.

81 Taxmann.com 159High Court2017#5831 most cited

What is PCIT v. Zydus Wellness Ltd. authority for?

Trademark expenditure incurred to facilitate business operations is considered revenue expenditure, as it does not create an enduring benefit. Product registration expenditure is also revenue in nature as it enables the sale of products.

20

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2026.

Also referred to as

PCIT v. Zydus Wellness Ltd · 81 Taxmann.com 159 · trademark expenditure · revenue expenditure · product registration · enduring benefit · commercial expediency · section 37

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing PCIT v. Zydus Wellness Ltd.

The ITO, Ward-1(1)(2), Ahmedabad vs. M/S. Bajaj Herbals Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed, and that of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2350/AHD/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad31 Jan 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Royआयकरअपीलसं.Ita Nos. 2277/Ahd/2015 "नधा"रणवष"/Asstt. Year: 2010-11 M/S. Bajaj Herbals Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Ito A-401, Samundra Complex, Ward-1(2), 3Rd Floor, Pratyakash- Nr. Hotel Classic Gold, Ellisbridge, Ahmedabad Kar-Bhavan, Ambawadi, Ahmedabad- 380015 Pan No. Aaa Cb6 654 J अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "त् यथ"/ (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Tushar Hemani, & Shri PFor Respondent: Shri O.P. Sharma CIT DR& L.P
Section 115JSection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

…आयकरअपील"यअ"धकरण, अहमदाबाद"यायपीठ ‘C’- अहमदाबाद। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD – BENCH ‘C’ BEFORE SHRI WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & Ms. MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं.ITA Nos. 2277/Ahd/2015 "नधा"रणवष"/Asstt. Year: 2010-11 M/s. Bajaj Herbals Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO A-401, Samundra Complex, Ward-1(2), 3rd Floor, Pratyakash- Nr. Hotel Classic Gold, Ellisbridge, Ahmedabad Kar-Bhavan, Ambawadi, Ahmedabad- 380015 PAN No. AAA CB6 654 J अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "त् यथ"/ (Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं.ITA Nos. 2350/Ahd/2015 "नधा"रणवष"/Asstt. Years: 2010-11 ITO Vs. M/s. Bajaj Herbals Pvt. Ward-1(1)(2), Ltd…

M/S. Bajaj Herbals Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2), Ahmedabad

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed, and that of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2277/AHD/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad31 Jan 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Royआयकरअपीलसं.Ita Nos. 2277/Ahd/2015 "नधा"रणवष"/Asstt. Year: 2010-11 M/S. Bajaj Herbals Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Ito A-401, Samundra Complex, Ward-1(2), 3Rd Floor, Pratyakash- Nr. Hotel Classic Gold, Ellisbridge, Ahmedabad Kar-Bhavan, Ambawadi, Ahmedabad- 380015 Pan No. Aaa Cb6 654 J अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "त् यथ"/ (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Tushar Hemani, & Shri PFor Respondent: Shri O.P. Sharma CIT DR& L.P
Section 115JSection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

…आयकरअपील"यअ"धकरण, अहमदाबाद"यायपीठ ‘C’- अहमदाबाद। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD – BENCH ‘C’ BEFORE SHRI WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & Ms. MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं.ITA Nos. 2277/Ahd/2015 "नधा"रणवष"/Asstt. Year: 2010-11 M/s. Bajaj Herbals Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO A-401, Samundra Complex, Ward-1(2), 3rd Floor, Pratyakash- Nr. Hotel Classic Gold, Ellisbridge, Ahmedabad Kar-Bhavan, Ambawadi, Ahmedabad- 380015 PAN No. AAA CB6 654 J अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "त् यथ"/ (Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं.ITA Nos. 2350/Ahd/2015 "नधा"रणवष"/Asstt. Years: 2010-11 ITO Vs. M/s. Bajaj Herbals Pvt. Ward-1(1)(2), Ltd…

PCIT v. Zydus Wellness Ltd. (81 Taxmann.com 159) — Cited in 20 Judgments | BharatTax