PCIT v. Wel Intertrade Pvt. Ltd.

152 Taxmann.com 663High Court2023#9636 most cited
11

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2024 to 2026.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing PCIT v. Wel Intertrade Pvt. Ltd.

APACE DEVELOPERS PVT LTD,GHAZIABAD vs. ITO WARD-3(1), DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 204/DEL/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Apr 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Manish Agarwal[Assessment Year : 2016-17] Apace Developers Pvt.Ltd. Vs Ito Flat No.1034, Ground Floor, C.R.Building Kondli Gharol, Mayur Vihar, I.P.Estate Phase-Iii, Delhi-110096 Delhi-110002. Pan-Aahca5732D Appellant Respondent [Assessment Year : 2016-17] Ito Vs Apace Developers Pvt.Ltd. C.R.Building Flat No.1034, Ground Floor, I.P.Estate Kondli Gharol, Mayur Vihar, Delhi-110002. Phase-Iii, Delhi-110096 Pan-Aahca5732D Appellant Respondent Appellant By Shri Akhilesh Kumar, Adv. & Shri Govind Agarwal, Ca Respondent By Shri Jitender Singh, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 03.02.2026 Date Of Pronouncement 01.04.2026

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250

…ITA No.204 & 856/Del/2025 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI “A” BENCH: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER [Assessment Year : 2016-17] Apace Developers Pvt.Ltd. vs ITO Flat No.1034, Ground Floor, C.R.Building Kondli Gharol, Mayur Vihar, I.P.Estate Phase-III, Delhi-110096 Delhi-110002. PAN-AAHCA5732D APPELLANT RESPONDENT [Assessment Year : 2016-17] ITO vs Apace Developers Pvt.Ltd. C.R.Building Flat No.1034, Ground Floor, I.P.Estate Kondli Gharol, Mayur Vihar, Delhi-110002. Phase-III, Delhi-110096 PAN-AAHCA5732D APPELLANT RESPONDENT Appellant by S…

ACE CABS LIMITED,DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1(2), DELHI, C R BUILDING

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 443/DEL/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi04 Oct 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Hon’Ble & Shri S.Rifaur Rahmanace Cabs Limited, Vs. Acit, Circle 1 (2), 562, Silver Oak Lane, Delhi. M.G. Road, Ghitorni, Delhi – 110 030. (Pan : Aaica4494R) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Gaurav Jain, Advocate Ms. Bharti Sharma, Advocate Revenue By : Shri Kanv Bali, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 23.07.2024 Date Of Order : 04.10.2024 Order Per S.Rifaur Rahman,Am: 1. This Appeal Has Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), New Delhi [“Ld. Cit(A)”, For Short]/ National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac) Dated 12.12.2023 For The Assessment Year 2017-18. 2. The Assessee Submitted An Application Under Rule 29 Of The Itat Rules For Admitting The Additional Evidences & The Contents Thereof Are Reproduced Below:-

For Appellant: Shri Gaurav Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Kanv Bali, Sr. DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘A’: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, HON’BLE VICE PRESIDENT and SHRI S.RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ACE Cabs Limited, vs. ACIT, Circle 1 (2), 562, Silver Oak Lane, Delhi. M.G. Road, Ghitorni, Delhi – 110 030. (PAN : AAICA4494R) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : Shri Gaurav Jain, Advocate Ms. Bharti Sharma, Advocate REVENUE BY : Shri Kanv Bali, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 23.07.2024 Date of Order : 04.10.2024 ORDER PER S.RIFAUR RAHMAN,AM: 1. This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), New Delhi…