PCIT v. V. Ramaiah

103 Taxmann.com 201High Court2019#4847 most cited

What is PCIT v. V. Ramaiah authority for?

Non-communication of reasons recorded for reassessment to the assessee is not a mere procedural lapse. If reasons are not communicated, the reassessment order can be quashed.

24

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2025.

Also referred to as

PCIT v. V. Ramaiah · section 148 · reopening of assessment · non-communication of reasons · procedural lapse · quashing reassessment order · natural justice

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing PCIT v. V. Ramaiah

SHRI S. SUBASH CHAND NAHAR,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-II(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 700/CHNY/2022[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai31 Jan 2023AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.700/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2006-07 Shri S. Subash Chand Nahar, The Dy. Commissioner Of No.6/1, Nahar Drive, Income, Maharani Chinnamba Road, Vs. Central Circle-Ii(1), Alwarpet, Chennai. Chennai – 600 018. [Pan: Aaepn-6258-P] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri G. Baskar & Shri I. Dinesh, Advocates : Shri Ar. V Sreenivasan, Addl. Cit ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 30.01.2023 : 31.01.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri G. Baskar & Shri I. Dinesh
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 148Section 153A

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ‘ए’ "यायपीठ, चे"ई। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH: CHENNAI "ी महावीर "सह, उपा"य" एवं "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल, लेखा सद"य के सम" BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENTAND SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.700/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2006-07 Shri S. Subash Chand Nahar, The Dy. Commissioner of No.6/1, Nahar Drive, Income, Maharani Chinnamba Road, Vs. Central Circle-II(1), Alwarpet, Chennai. Chennai – 600 018. [PAN: AAEPN-6258-P] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant by : Shri G. Baskar & Shri I. Dinesh, A…

FARROKH P MISTREE ,MUMBAI vs. ITO 19 (3)(1), MUMBAI

ITA 6550/MUM/2019[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Sept 2021AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Am & Shri Ravish Sood, Jm आमकय अऩीर सं./ Ita No. 6550/Mum/2019 (यनधाायण वषा / Assessment Year 2006-07) Farrokh P. Mistree The Income Tax Officer, C/O. K.K. Lalkaka & Co. Ward-19(3)(1) 507, Churchgate Chambers, 5, New Piramal Chambers Parel, बनाम/ Marine Lines Mumbai-400 013 Vs. Mumbai-400 020 (अपीऱार्थी / Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) स्र्थायी ऱेखा सुं./Pan No. Aoipm7129M आवेदक की ओय से / Applicant By : Shri Kercy Lalkakal, Ar प्रत्मथी की ओय से / Respondent By : Shri Sanjay J. Sethi, Dr

For Respondent: Shri Sanjay J. Sethi, DR
Section 147Section 148

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण “SMC” न्यायपीठ म ुंबई में IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC” BENCH, MUMBAI श्री एस रयपऔय यहभान, रेखा सदस्म एवं श्री यवीश सूद, न्मायमक सदस्म के सभऺ BEFORE SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, AM AND SHRI RAVISH SOOD, JM आमकय अऩीर सं./ ITA No. 6550/Mum/2019 (यनधाायण वषा / Assessment Year 2006-07) Farrokh P. Mistree The Income Tax Officer, C/o. K.K. Lalkaka & Co. Ward-19(3)(1) 507, Churchgate Chambers, 5, New Piramal Chambers Parel, बनाम/ Marine Lines Mumbai-400 013 Vs. Mumbai-400 020 (अपीऱार्थी / Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) स्र्थायी ऱेखा सुं./PAN No. AOIPM7129M आवेदक की ओय से / Applicant by : S…

Showing 120 of 24 · Page 1 of 2