PCIT v. Tejua Rohitkumar Kapadia
94 Taxmann.com 324High Court2018#3300 most cited
What is PCIT v. Tejua Rohitkumar Kapadia authority for?
Expenditure cannot be treated as bogus or added under section 69C if it is supported by bills, paid by cheque, confirmed by the supplier, and the sale consideration has not returned to the assessee. The supplier must also have accounted for the purchase and paid taxes.
36
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2026.
Also referred to as
PCIT v. Tejua Rohitkumar Kapadia · section 69C · bogus purchases · expenditure out of books · account payee cheques · supplier confirmation · Hon SC SLP dismissed
Sections most often in play
Issues it is cited on
Judgments citing PCIT v. Tejua Rohitkumar Kapadia
Showing 1–20 of 36 · Page 1 of 2