PCIT v. Rashtreeya Shiksha Samithi Trust

152 Taxmann.com 664High Court2023#6266 most cited

What is PCIT v. Rashtreeya Shiksha Samithi Trust authority for?

An assessee is entitled to the benefit of an exemption certificate as long as it remains in force. Compliance with registration under different tax laws is a relevant consideration for tax authorities when deciding applications for approval under section 10(23C).

18

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2024 to 2026.

Also referred to as

PCIT v. Rashtreeya Shiksha Samithi Trust · section 10(23C) · exemption certificate · registration under tax law · charitable trust exemption · educational society approval · Karnataka HC

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing PCIT v. Rashtreeya Shiksha Samithi Trust

ST.JOSEPH'S EDUCATIONAL TRUST,CHENNAI vs. PCIT CENTRAL CHENNAI - 1, CHENNAI

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 1620/CHNY/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Oct 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Hon’Ble Shri Jagadishआयकरअपील सं./ Ita Nos.1618 & 1619 /Chny/2024 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2018-19 & 2020-2021) St. Joseph’S Institute Of Science & Vs. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Technology Trust, Tax, No.56C, Old Mahabalipuram Road, Central, Chennai -1 Sholinganallur, Chennai 600 119. [Pan: Aahts 9943B] आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1620 /Chny/2024 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2020-2021) St. Joseph’S Educational Trust, Vs The Principal Commissioner Of Income No.56C, Old Mahabalipuram Road, Tax, Sholinganallur, Chennai 600 119. Central, Chennai -1 [Pan: Aamts 3888G] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri K.R. Vasudevan, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Shri Nilay Baran Som, Irs, Cit.

For Appellant: Shri K.R. Vasudevan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Nilay Baran Som, IRS, CIT
Section 11Section 115BSection 12ASection 142(1)Section 153ASection 153DSection 263

…Act, in the respect of donations which were applied for the charitable objects of the Trust. He also submitted that the Karnataka High Court in the case of Kammavari Sangham VS DDIT (2023) 459 ITR 433 (Kar) and PCIT VS Rashtreeya Sikshana Samithi Trust (2023) 152 Taxmann.com 664 (Kar) has taken similar view. Therefore, the ld. Counsel for the assessee argued that the AO has taken one of the plausible views and hence the order of the AO cannot be termed as "erroneous" in view of the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Malabar Industrial Co Ltd and Max India Ltd (supra). The ld. Counsel for the assessee ar…

ST.JOSEPH'S INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY TRUST,CHENNAI vs. PCIT CENTRAL CHENNAI - 1, CHENNAI

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 1619/CHNY/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Oct 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Hon’Ble Shri Jagadishआयकरअपील सं./ Ita Nos.1618 & 1619 /Chny/2024 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2018-19 & 2020-2021) St. Joseph’S Institute Of Science & Vs. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Technology Trust, Tax, No.56C, Old Mahabalipuram Road, Central, Chennai -1 Sholinganallur, Chennai 600 119. [Pan: Aahts 9943B] आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1620 /Chny/2024 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2020-2021) St. Joseph’S Educational Trust, Vs The Principal Commissioner Of Income No.56C, Old Mahabalipuram Road, Tax, Sholinganallur, Chennai 600 119. Central, Chennai -1 [Pan: Aamts 3888G] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri K.R. Vasudevan, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Shri Nilay Baran Som, Irs, Cit.

For Appellant: Shri K.R. Vasudevan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Nilay Baran Som, IRS, CIT
Section 11Section 115BSection 12ASection 142(1)Section 153ASection 153DSection 263

…Act, in the respect of donations which were applied for the charitable objects of the Trust. He also submitted that the Karnataka High Court in the case of Kammavari Sangham VS DDIT (2023) 459 ITR 433 (Kar) and PCIT VS Rashtreeya Sikshana Samithi Trust (2023) 152 Taxmann.com 664 (Kar) has taken similar view. Therefore, the ld. Counsel for the assessee argued that the AO has taken one of the plausible views and hence the order of the AO cannot be termed as "erroneous" in view of the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Malabar Industrial Co Ltd and Max India Ltd (supra). The ld. Counsel for the assessee ar…

PCIT v. Rashtreeya Shiksha Samithi Trust (152 Taxmann.com 664) — Cited in 18 Judgments | BharatTax