DR H KRISHNA vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX
In the result, we do not find
ITA/541/2014HC Karnataka17 Nov 2020
Bench: ALOK ARADHE,H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 260Section 260A
…e has been placed on 'ASHISH PLASTIC INDUSTRIES VS. ACIT', 2015-TIOL-51-SC-IT, 'M.BASHEER AHAMED VS. CIT, (2013) 352 ITR 157 (MAD), 'CIT VS. GEORGE HENDERSON & CO. LTD', (1967) 66 ITR 622 (SC), 'PR. CIT VS. QUARK MEDIA HOUSE INDIA (P.) LTD.', (2017 391 ITR 145 (P & H), and 'HIRA LAL RAM DAYAL VS. CIT', (1980) 122 ITR 461 (P & H). 5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the revenue submitted that the assessee had mentioned the 8 cost of acquisition as Rs.11.32 Crores in the Special Power Of Attorney, which is a registered document. It is further submitted that the assessee in fact is attempt…