PCIT v. Marck Biosciences Ltd.

106 Taxmann.com 399High Court2019#5653 most cited

What is PCIT v. Marck Biosciences Ltd. authority for?

Failure to issue a valid notice under section 143(2) after the filing of a return of income in response to a notice under section 148 renders the assessment order invalid. Section 292BB does not cure this defect, as it is not a procedural irregularity.

20

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2025.

Also referred to as

PCIT vs. Marck Biosciences Ltd · section 143(2) · section 148 · section 292BB · notice · assessment order · jurisdictional issue · invalid notice · return of income

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing PCIT v. Marck Biosciences Ltd.

MADHUBEN NAROTTAMBHAI PATEL,NA vs. ARIVS.ITO, WARD-3, NAVSARI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 967/SRT/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat28 Feb 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.967/Srt/2024 Assessment Year: (2012-13) (Hybrid Hearing) Madhuben Narottambhai Patel Income Tax Officer, Ward-3, बनाम/ C/O Modern Furniture, Navsari, Room No.206, Income Vs. Brahman Faliya, Khergam Tax Officer, Char Pool, Awabaug, Road, Chikhli, Navsari-396 521 Navsari-396 445 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Bsppp 1158 N (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" /Respondent) िनधा"रती की ओर से /Appellant By Shri Rajesh Upadhyay, Ar राज" की ओर से /Respondent By Shri Mukesh Jain, Sr-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing 27/02/2025 उद्घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement 28/02/2025

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 271(1)(c)

…IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, SURAT BENCH, SURAT BEFORE SHRI SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI BIJAYANANDA PRUSETH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.967/SRT/2024 Assessment Year: (2012-13) (Hybrid hearing) Madhuben Narottambhai Patel Income Tax Officer, Ward-3, बनाम/ C/o Modern Furniture, Navsari, Room No.206, Income Vs. Brahman Faliya, Khergam Tax Officer, Char Pool, Awabaug, Road, Chikhli, Navsari-396 521 Navsari-396 445 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No: BSPPP 1158 N (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" /Respondent) िनधा"रती की ओर से /Appellant by Shri Rajesh Upadhyay, AR राज" की ओर से /Respondent…

PCIT v. Marck Biosciences Ltd. (106 Taxmann.com 399) — Cited in 20 Judgments | BharatTax