PCIT v. M. Tech India P. Ltd.

381 ITR 31High Court2016#4584 most cited

What is PCIT v. M. Tech India P. Ltd. authority for?

Payments for software as a product are treated as purchases, not royalties for the use or right to use software. This distinction is important for determining tax implications under Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements.

26

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2022.

Also referred to as

PCIT v. M. Tech India P. Ltd. · royalty · software · DTAA · Article 12(3) · purchase of software · right to use software · India-US DTAA · payments for software

Judgments citing PCIT v. M. Tech India P. Ltd.

SYMANTEC ASIA PACIFIC PTE LTD.,SINGAPORE vs. DCIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1000/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Shri N.K.Billaiya, Am [Through Video Conferencing] आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.1000/Del/2017 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year 2013-14 Symantec Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd., 6 Temasek Boulevard, #12-01, Suntec Tower Four, Singapore 038986 ..........अपीलाथ"/Appellant Pan-Aaocs1828F Vs The Dcit (International Taxation), Circle-3(1)(2), Room No.419, Block E-2, Civic Centre, …………. ""यथ" / Respondent J.L.N.Marg, New Delhi-110002. अपीलाथ" क" ओर से / Appellant By : Sh. Nageshwar Rao, Adv. & Ms. Deepika Aggarwal, Adv. ""यथ" क" ओर से / Respondent By : Sh. Satpal Gulati, Cit Dr

For Appellant: Sh. Nageshwar Rao, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. Satpal Gulati, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 253(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 9(1)(vi)

…ainst loss, destruction or damage has been held by the Delhi High Court in DIT v. M/s Nokia Networks OY (Supra) as not amounting to acquiring a copyright in the software.” 25. Further, the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in Pr.CIT vs M.Tech India Ltd. (P.) [2017] 381 ITR 31 (Del.) held as under:- “12. In the cases where an Assessee acquires the right to use a software, the payment so made would amount to royalty. However in cases where the payments are made for purchase of software as a product, the consideration paid cannot be considered to be for use or the right to use the software. It is well settled that where s…

Showing 120 of 26 · Page 1 of 2