PCIT v. Indravadan Jain HUF

156 Taxmann.com 605High Court2023#2327 most cited

What is PCIT v. Indravadan Jain HUF authority for?

Capital gains from share transactions cannot be added as unexplained cash credit under section 68 if shares were purchased on the stock exchange floor, payment was through banking channels, shares were held in a demat account for over a year, contract notes were issued, and sales were made on the stock exchange.

49

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2024 to 2026.

Also referred to as

PCIT v. Indravadan Jain HUF · section 68 · unexplained cash credit · bogus long term capital gain · penny stock · shares purchased on stock exchange · banking channel payment · demat account · contract notes

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing PCIT v. Indravadan Jain HUF

DCIT (CC)-8(4), MUMBAI vs. REENA RATNESH JAIN , MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal is dismissed

ITA 3888/MUM/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai06 Feb 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokardcit(Cc)-8(4) Reena Ratnesh Jain Room No. 659, 6Th Floor, 902/903, A Wing, Kalinga Tower, Aayakar Bhavan, M. K. Road, Vs. Nirmal Nagar, Near D-Mart, Mumbai-400 020 Mulund (W), Mumbai-400 080 Pan/Gir No. Aeapj 6605 C (Appellant) : (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri Bhadresh Doshi Respondent By : Shri Annavaram Kosuri (Sr. Ar) Date Of Hearing : 03.02.2026 Date Of Pronouncement : 06.02.2026 O R D E R Per Saktijit Dey: This Is An Appeal By The Department, Against Order Dated 26.03.2025 Of Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Mumbai (‘Ld.Cit(A) For Short), Pertaining To The Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2016-17. 2. Though, The Department Has Raised Multiple Grounds, However, The Dispute In Short Is In Relation To Deletion Of Addition Made Of Rs.80,23,019/-, Being Bogus Long Term Capital Gain (‘Ltcg’ For Short) Added U/S. 68 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘The Act’ For Short) & Addition Of An Amount Of Rs.80,230/-, Being Commission Paid By The Assessee For Arranging The Accommodation Entry Of Bogus Ltcg.

For Appellant: Shri Bhadresh DoshiFor Respondent: Shri Annavaram Kosuri (Sr. AR)
Section 147Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI MAKARAND VASANT MAHADEOKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DCIT(CC)-8(4) Reena Ratnesh Jain Room No. 659, 6th Floor, 902/903, A Wing, Kalinga Tower, Aayakar Bhavan, M. K. Road, Vs. Nirmal Nagar, Near D-Mart, Mumbai-400 020 Mulund (W), Mumbai-400 080 PAN/GIR No. AEAPJ 6605 C (Appellant) : (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Bhadresh Doshi Respondent by : Shri Annavaram Kosuri (Sr. AR) Date of Hearing : 03.02.2026 Date of Pronouncement : 06.02.2026 O R D E R Per Saktijit Dey, Vice President: This is an appeal by the department,…

NEELAM SANJAY MEHTA ,MUMBAI vs. NFAC, DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 5859/MUM/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Dec 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry (Jm) A N D Shri Prabhash Shankar (Am) Smt. Neelam Sanjay Mehta Ito, Ward 19(2)(4), 2/78-80, Gora Gandhi Building, C.P. Mumbai/ Nfac, Delhi Tank Road Vs. Mumbai-400 004. Pan : Ayzpm8574E Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Vimal Punmiya, Ld. Ca Revenue By : Shri Leyaqat Ali Aafaqui, Ld. Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 01/10/2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 17/12/2025 O R D E R Per Narender Kumar Choudhry (Jm) :- This Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 20.9.2024 Impugned Herein Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax/Nfac, Delhi (In Short Ld. Commissioner) Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short ‘Act’) For A.Y. 2015-16. 2. In The Instant Case, The Assessee Being An Individual Deriving Income From Salary, House Property, Capital Gain & Other Sources Had Declared Her Total Income At Rs. 4,63,750/- By Filing Her Return Of Income On Dated 1.9.2015 For The Assessment Year Under Consideration. Subsequently, Case Of The Assessee Was Reopened Under Section 147 Of The Act, With The Reason That The Assessee Is One Of The Beneficiaries, Who Has Made Sale Of Shares, Wherein Trading Quantity Is Higher Than ‘Buy Trades Quantity’ Of The Scrip M/S. Toyam Industries Ltd. To The Tune Of Rs. 1,99,12,777/- & Accordingly, Statutory Notices Were Issued To The Assessee. In Response To Which, The Assessee Filed Relevant Details & The Documents, Such As Purchase Documents, Sale Contract Note, Bank Statement Etc. Qua Purchase & Sale Of Shares Of Scrip Namely M/S. Toyam Industries Ltd. .

For Appellant: Shri Vimal Punmiya, Ld. CAFor Respondent: Shri Leyaqat Ali Aafaqui, Ld. Sr
Section 10(38)Section 147Section 155BSection 250Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Mumbai “B” Bench, Mumbai. Before Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry (JM) A N D Shri Prabhash Shankar (AM) Smt. Neelam Sanjay Mehta ITO, Ward 19(2)(4), 2/78-80, Gora Gandhi Building, C.P. Mumbai/ NFAC, Delhi Tank Road Vs. Mumbai-400 004. PAN : AYZPM8574E Appellant Respondent Assessee by : Shri Vimal Punmiya, Ld. CA Revenue by : Shri Leyaqat Ali Aafaqui, Ld. Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 01/10/2025 Date of pronouncement : 17/12/2025 O R D E R Per Narender Kumar Choudhry (JM) :- This appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 20.9.2024 impugned herein passed by the…

HEMLATA PARESH SURANA ,MUMBAI vs. ITO , WARD 19(1)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 5770/MUM/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Nov 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry, Jm Hemlata Paresh Surana I.T.O. Ward 19(1)(1), 4-A, 30-B, Taj Building, A. K. Mumbai Marg, Gowalia Tank, Mumbai Vs. – 400 036. Pan/Gir No. Abeps6199P (Appellant) : (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri R. M. Jain Respondent By : Shri Sandeep Jumale, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 19.11.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 28.11.2025 O R D E R Per Narender Kumar Choudhry, J M: This Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 24.07.2025, Impugned Herein, Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 48, Mumbai (In Short Ld. Commissioner) U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short ‘The Act’) For The A.Y. 2018-19. 2. In The Instant Case, The Assessee Has Sold 20,500 Shares Of Ammltd/Apu Marketing/Eject Marketing On A Total Consideration Of Rs. 14,92,810/- On Dated 01.02.2018 Through Online Platform/Bombay Exchange & Therefore Has Earned Long Term Capital Gain Of Rs. 12,87,180/- & Claimed The Same As Exempt U/S. 10(38) Of The Act. Hemlata Paresh Surana

For Appellant: Shri R. M. JainFor Respondent: Shri Sandeep Jumale, SR. DR
Section 10(38)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY, JM Hemlata Paresh Surana I.T.O. Ward 19(1)(1), 4-A, 30-B, Taj Building, A. K. Mumbai Marg, Gowalia Tank, Mumbai Vs. – 400 036. PAN/GIR No. ABEPS6199P (Appellant) : (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri R. M. Jain Respondent by : Shri Sandeep Jumale, SR. DR Date of Hearing : 19.11.2025 Date of Pronouncement : 28.11.2025 O R D E R Per Narender Kumar Choudhry, J M: This appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 24.07.2025, impugned herein, passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) 48, Mumbai (…

NARENDRA SHANTILAL BAPNA,NAVI MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WD-28(2)(3), MUMBAI, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 4198/MUM/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Nov 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Prabhash Shankarnarendra Shantilal Bapna V/S. Income Tax Officer, Ward – Flat No. A2501, Plot No. R3 बनाम 28(2)(3) B Emerald Bay, Sector 14, 4Th Floor, Tower No. 6, Vashi Nerul, Navi Mumbai – Station Complex, Vashi, Navi 400 706, Maharashtra Mumbai– 400703, Maharashtra स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No: Aclpb8458J Appellant/अपीलार्थी .. Respondent/प्रतिवादी

For Appellant: Shri Prakash Jhunjhunwala, ARFor Respondent: Shri Leyaqat Ali Aafaqui, (Sr.DR)
Section 131Section 143(3)Section 68

…IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL”B” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Narendra Shantilal Bapna v/s. Income Tax Officer, Ward – Flat No. A2501, Plot No. R3 बनाम 28(2)(3) B Emerald Bay, Sector 14, 4th Floor, Tower No. 6, Vashi Nerul, Navi Mumbai – Station Complex, Vashi, Navi 400 706, Maharashtra Mumbai– 400703, Maharashtra स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No: ACLPB8458J Appellant/अपीलार्थी .. Respondent/प्रतिवादी Appellant by : Shri Prakash Jhunjhunwala, AR Respondent by : Shri Leyaqat Ali Aafaqui, (Sr.DR) Date of Hearing 30.09.20…

SALONI GIRRAJKISHOR AGRAWAL,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 25(1)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 3234/MUM/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Nov 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Justice (Retd.) C. V. Bhadang & Shri Prabhash Shankarsaloni Girrajkishor Agrawal V/S. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1601/1602, Green Acre, बनाम –25(1)(1),Kautilya Bhavan, Lokhandwala Complex, Andheri Bandra Kurla Complex, (West), Mumbai – 400 053, Bandra (East), Mumbai – Maharashtra 400051, Maharashtra स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No: Anupa1692D Appellant/अपीलार्थी .. Respondent/प्रतिवादी

For Appellant: Shri Prakash Jhunjhunwala, ARFor Respondent: Shri Swapnil Choudhary, (Sr. DR)
Section 10(38)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 68

…IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL“G” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE JUSTICE (RETD.) C. V. BHADANG, PRESIDENT & SHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Saloni Girrajkishor Agrawal v/s. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1601/1602, Green Acre, बनाम –25(1)(1),Kautilya Bhavan, Lokhandwala Complex, Andheri Bandra Kurla Complex, (West), Mumbai – 400 053, Bandra (East), Mumbai – Maharashtra 400051, Maharashtra स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No: ANUPA1692D Appellant/अपीलार्थी .. Respondent/प्रतिवादी Appellant by : Shri Prakash Jhunjhunwala, AR Respondent by : Shri Swapnil Choudhary, (Sr. DR) Date of Hearing 16.10.2025 Date of Pr…

DEVANG BHUPENDRA SHAH,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER 32(1)(4), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 4218/MUM/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 Oct 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Prabhash Shankardevang Bhupendra Shah, V/S. Income Tax Officer, Ward – B/9, Neminath Apt., बनाम 32(1)(4), Kautilya Bhavan, Shimpoli Road, Borivali Bandra Kurla Complex, West, Mumbai – 400 092, Bandra (East), Mumbai– Maharashtra 400051, Maharashtra स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No: Aadps1211L Appellant/अपीलार्थी .. Respondent/प्रतिवादी

For Appellant: Shri Rahul Kapadia,ARFor Respondent: Shri Annavaran Kasuri, (Sr. AR)
Section 10(38)Section 143(3)Section 68Section 69C

…IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL“D” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Devang Bhupendra Shah, v/s. Income Tax Officer, Ward – B/9, Neminath Apt., बनाम 32(1)(4), Kautilya Bhavan, Shimpoli Road, Borivali Bandra Kurla Complex, West, Mumbai – 400 092, Bandra (East), Mumbai– Maharashtra 400051, Maharashtra स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No: AADPS1211L Appellant/अपीलार्थी .. Respondent/प्रतिवादी Appellant by : Shri Rahul Kapadia,AR Respondent by : Shri Annavaran Kasuri, (Sr. AR) Date of Hearing 11.08.2025 Date of Pronouncement 13.10.2025 आदेश…

Showing 120 of 49 · Page 1 of 3

PCIT v. Indravadan Jain HUF (156 Taxmann.com 605) — Cited in 49 Judgments | BharatTax