PCIT v. Drisha Impex (P.) Ltd.

173 Taxmann.com 571High Court2025#5214 most cited

What is PCIT v. Drisha Impex (P.) Ltd. authority for?

A High Court decision upholding additions made by the Assessing Officer for non-genuine purchases is affirmed when an SLP against it is dismissed by the Supreme Court. The Assessing Officer's addition for alleged bogus purchases is justified and can be sustained.

22

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2025 to 2026.

Also referred to as

PCIT v. Drisha Impex (P.) Ltd. · 173 Taxmann.com 571 · Bombay High Court · non-genuine purchases · addition sustained · Assessing Officer · CIT(A) erred · section 37(1) · bogus purchases · search and seizure · ex-parte order · rule 46A

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing PCIT v. Drisha Impex (P.) Ltd.

NAVGRAHAA JEWELS PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

ITA 4786/MUM/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Jan 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Anikesh Banerjee & Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokarnavgrahaa Jewels Private Ltd. Vs Deputy Commissioner 7(1)(1), Unit No.341 & 342, Pragati Mumbai Industrial Esrate, N. M. Joshi Aayakar Bhawan, Mumbai-400020 Marg, Lower Parel East, Mumbai-400011 Pan: Aaecn0220G Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Dharan Gandhi, Adv., Ms. Vinita Nara Adv Respondent By : Shri Leyaqat Ali Aafaqui, Sr Dr Date Of Hearing : 28/01/2026 Date Of Pronouncement : 30/01/2026 O R D E R Per: Anikesh Banerjee (Jm): The Instant Appeal Of The Assessee Filed Against The Order Of The Nfac, Delhi [For Brevity ‘The Ld. Cit(A)], Order Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act 1961 (For Brevity ‘The Act’) For Assessment Year 2013-14, Date Of Order 11.11.2024. The Impugned Order Emanated From The Order Of The Assessment

For Appellant: Shri Dharan Gandhi, Adv., Ms. Vinita Nara AdvFor Respondent: Shri Leyaqat Ali Aafaqui, SR DR
Section 14Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 14bSection 250Section 69C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “B”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MAKARAND VASANT MAHADEOKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Navgrahaa Jewels Private Ltd. vs Deputy Commissioner 7(1)(1), Unit No.341 & 342, Pragati Mumbai Industrial Esrate, N. M. Joshi Aayakar Bhawan, Mumbai-400020 Marg, Lower Parel East, Mumbai-400011 PAN: AAECN0220G APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri Dharan Gandhi, Adv., Ms. Vinita Nara Adv Respondent by : Shri Leyaqat Ali Aafaqui, SR DR Date of hearing : 28/01/2026 Date of pronouncement : 30/01/2026 O R D E R Per: Anikesh Banerjee (JM): The instant app…

ANIL K. SHAH HUF ,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 41(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3630/MUM/2025[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Sept 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Vikram Singh Yadav & Shri Anikesh Banerjeeassessment Year : 2009-10 Anil K. Shah (Huf), Income Tax Officer, 703, Supershav, Nahur Road, Ward-41(2)(1), Sarvodaya Nagar, Vs. Room No. 636, Mulund (West), Kautilya Bhavan, Mumbai-400080. Bandra Kurla Complex, Pan : Aadha5072M Bandra East, Mumbai-400051. (Appellant) (Respondent) For Assessee : Shri Devendra Jain & Shri Shashank Mehta For Revenue : Shri Surendra Mohan, Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing : 10-09-2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 16-09-2025 O R D E R Per Vikram Singh Yadav, A.M : This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi [„Ld.Cit(A)‟], Dated 25-04-2025, Pertaining To Assessment Year (Ay) 2009-10, Challenging The Sustenance Of Levy Of Penalty Of Rs. 6,96,096/- U/S. 271(1)(C) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 („The Act‟).

For Appellant: Shri Devendra Jain &For Respondent: Shri Surendra Mohan, Sr.DR
Section 143(3)Section 148Section 271(1)(c)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI “A” BENCH : MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2009-10 Anil K. Shah (HUF), Income Tax Officer, 703, Supershav, Nahur Road, Ward-41(2)(1), Sarvodaya Nagar, vs. Room No. 636, Mulund (West), Kautilya Bhavan, Mumbai-400080. Bandra Kurla Complex, PAN : AADHA5072M Bandra East, Mumbai-400051. (Appellant) (Respondent) For Assessee : Shri Devendra Jain & Shri Shashank Mehta For Revenue : Shri Surendra Mohan, Sr.DR Date of Hearing : 10-09-2025 Date of Pronouncement : 16-09-2025 O R D E R PER VIKRAM…

Showing 120 of 22 · Page 1 of 2

PCIT v. Drisha Impex (P.) Ltd. (173 Taxmann.com 571) — Cited in 22 Judgments | BharatTax