PCIT-4, Pune v. Vishay Components (P) Ltd. Components Pvt. Ltd.

103 Taxmann.com 421Reported decision2019#12030 most cited
8

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2022 to 2023.

Judgments citing PCIT-4, Pune v. Vishay Components (P) Ltd. Components Pvt. Ltd.

THYSSENKRUPP INDUSTRIES INDIA P. LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CIR 3(3)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1886/MUM/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Apr 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shir M Balaganesh & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadalethyssenkrupp Industries Vs. Dcit, Circle – 3(3)(2) India Pvt Ltd., Aayakar Bhavan, 154-C, Mittal Towers, Room No. 609, 15Th Floor, 210, Mumbai – 400020. Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021. Pan/Gir No. : Aaack1947K Appellant .. Respondent Appellant By : Shri Madhur Aggarwal & Shri Pratik Podar.Ar Respondent By : Shri Samuel Pitta.Dr Date Of Hearing 16.03.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 27.03.2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale Jm: The Assessee Has Filed The Appeal Against The Order Passed U/S 143(3) R.W.S 144C(13) Of The Act In Pursuance To The Directions Of The Dispute Resolution Panel (Drp) Order U/S 144C(5) Of The Act Dated 23.12.2016. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:

For Appellant: Shri Madhur Aggarwal &For Respondent: Shri Samuel Pitta.DR
Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “J” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHIR M BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JUDICIAL MEMBER Thyssenkrupp Industries Vs. DCIT, Circle – 3(3)(2) India Pvt Ltd., Aayakar Bhavan, 154-C, Mittal Towers, Room No. 609, 15th Floor, 210, Mumbai – 400020. Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021. PAN/GIR No. : AAACK1947K Appellant .. Respondent Appellant by : Shri Madhur Aggarwal & Shri Pratik Podar.AR Respondent by : Shri Samuel Pitta.DR Date of Hearing 16.03.2023 Date of Pronouncement 27.03.2023 आदेश / O R D E R PER PAVAN KUMAR GADALE JM: The assessee has filed the appeal against…

THYSSENKRUPP ELECTRICAL STEEL INDIA PVT.LTD,,NASHIK vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, NASHIK

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 624/PUN/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune01 Apr 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Sonjoy Sarmaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.624/Pun/2017 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2012-13 Thyssenkrupp Electrical Steel Vs. Acit, Circle-1, India Pvt. Ltd., Nashik. Gonde Village, Wadivarhe, Taluka, Igatpuri, Nashik-422403. Pan : Aaace7791B Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Nikhil S. Pathak Revenue By Shri Sunil Kumar : Date Of Hearing : 30.03.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 01.04.2022 आदेश / Order Per Inturi Rama Rao, Am : This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Directed Against The Final Assessment Order Of The Ld. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1, Nashik (‘The Assessing Officer’) Passed U/S 143(3) R.W.S. 144C(13) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘The Act’) Dated 25.01.2017 For The Assessment Year 2012-13. 2. Briefly, The Facts Of The Case Are That The Appellant Is A Company Incorporated Under The Provisions Of The Companies Act

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil S. Pathak
Section 143(3)Section 92C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH “C”, PUNE BEFORE SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.624/PUN/2017 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2012-13 ThyssenKrupp Electrical Steel Vs. ACIT, Circle-1, India Pvt. Ltd., Nashik. Gonde Village, Wadivarhe, Taluka, Igatpuri, Nashik-422403. PAN : AAACE7791B Appellant Respondent Assessee by : Shri Nikhil S. Pathak Revenue by Shri Sunil Kumar : Date of hearing : 30.03.2022 Date of pronouncement : 01.04.2022 आदेश / ORDER PER INTURI RAMA RAO, AM : This is an appeal filed by the assessee directed against th…