SRI. VIKRAM SHETTY,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(3)(1), BANGALORE
In the result, all the grounds of appeal are restored back to the ld
ITA 2170/BANG/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 May 2025AY 2013-14
Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri Soundararajan K.Assessment Year: 2013-14
For Appellant: Shri Deepak Bhat, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ganesh R. Gale, Standing Counsel
Section 144Section 54Section 90
…is for sufficient reason and hence condoned. 14. The assessee has also submitted a copy of the decision in ITA No.1913/Bang/2024 wherein the delay caused of around 6 years in filing of appeal before the Tribunal was condoned. As the Hon’ble Supreme Court in 4 SCR 241 (supra) has categorically held that because merely some persons obtained relief of similar nature, it does not mean that others are also entitled to the same benefit, if the court is Page 16 of 19 not satisfied with the cause shown for the delay in filing of appeal. Thus, no precedent can be cited or is required to be considered in condoning the d…