Par Excellence Leasing & Financial Services P.Ltd. v. ACIT

115 Taxmann.com 38High Court2020#5594 most cited

What is Par Excellence Leasing & Financial Services P.Ltd. v. ACIT authority for?

Where an assessee fails to discharge the onus of providing cogent evidence and explanation for cash deposits, the Assessing Officer is justified in making additions to the income under Section 68.

21

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2020 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Par Excellence Leasing & Financial Services P.Ltd. v. ACIT · 115 Taxmann.com 38 · section 68 · addition u/s 68 · cash deposit · agricultural income · undisclosed income · onus of proof · creditworthiness · genuineness of transaction

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Par Excellence Leasing & Financial Services P.Ltd. v. ACIT

Showing 120 of 21 · Page 1 of 2

Par Excellence Leasing & Financial Services P.Ltd. v. ACIT (115 Taxmann.com 38) — Cited in 21 Judgments | BharatTax