Om Parkash Nahar v. Income-tax Officer

135 Taxmann.com 377High Court2022#9396 most cited
11

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2023 to 2026.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Om Parkash Nahar v. Income-tax Officer

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, RAJKOT, RAJKOT vs. VAIBHAV GINNING SPINNING MILL PVT. LTD., RAJKOT

In the result, the Appeal of the Department is dismissed

ITA 826/RJT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot10 Apr 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकरअपील सं./ Ita No. 826/Rjt/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: (2017-18) (Physical Hearing) Dcit Vs. Vaibhav Ginning & Spinning Central Circle-2, Rajkot Mill Private Limited “Amruta Estate”, 2Nd Floor, Mg Road, National Highway – 27, Gondal Rajkot-360001 Rajkot Highway At Bhojpara, Gondal, Gujarat - 360311 Pan/Gir No.: Aadcv4397D (Assessee) (Respondent) िनधा"रती की ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Rajendra Singhal, Ar राज" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Cit.Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 26/02/2026 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 10/04/2026

For Appellant: Shri Rajendra Singhal, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, CIT.DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 69A

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण,राजकोट "ायपीठ, राजकोट। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT BEFORE DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND DR. DINESH MOHAN SINHA, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकरअपील सं./ ITA No. 826/RJT/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: (2017-18) (Physical Hearing) DCIT Vs. Vaibhav Ginning & Spinning Central Circle-2, Rajkot Mill Private Limited “Amruta Estate”, 2nd Floor, MG Road, National Highway – 27, Gondal Rajkot-360001 Rajkot Highway at Bhojpara, Gondal, Gujarat - 360311 PAN/GIR No.: AADCV4397D (Assessee) (Respondent) िनधा"रती की ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Rajendra Singhal, AR राज" की ओर…

SACHIDANANDAIAH GANESH,TAMIL NADU vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER WARD 1, HOSUR, HOSUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 190/CHNY/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai06 Jun 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S. R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.:190/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2017-18 Sachidanandaiah Ganesh, Income Tax Officer, 37, Vaniyar Street, Vs. Ward 1, Kelamangalam, Hosur. Krishnagiri, Tamil Nadu- 635 113. [Pan: Ajipg-9330-N] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri. Sandeep Chalapathy, C.AFor Respondent: Ms. Anitha Addl.C.I.T
Section 143(3)Section 69A

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ‘सी’ "ायपीठ, चे"ई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI "ी मनु कुमार िग"र, "ाियक सद" एवं "ी एस. आर. रघुनाथा, लेखा सद" के सम" BEFORE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S. R. RAGHUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.:190/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2017-18 Sachidanandaiah Ganesh, Income Tax Officer, 37, Vaniyar Street, vs. Ward 1, Kelamangalam, Hosur. Krishnagiri, Tamil Nadu- 635 113. [PAN: AJIPG-9330-N] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से/Appellant by : Shri. Sandeep Chalapathy, C.A. ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent by : Ms. A…

JAYPRAKASH BHOVANBHAI JAGANI HUF,RAJKOT vs. ITO, WARD-1(1)(1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 98/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot04 Jun 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Hybrid Hearing) Assessment Year: (2017-18) Shri Jayprakash Bhovanbhai Jagani Vs. The Ito, Ward-1(1)(1) (Huf) Rajkot. Block No.1001, Rajdhani Apartment Opp: Purhkardham, University Road Rajkot 360 005. Pan : Aaghj 5696 F (Appellant) (Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld.Ar राज"व क" ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld.Sr.Dr

For Appellant: Shri Mehul Ranpura, ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, ld.Sr.DR
Section 115BSection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 69A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RAJKOT BENCH “SMC”, RAJKOT BEFORE DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (Hybrid Hearing) Assessment Year: (2017-18) Shri Jayprakash Bhovanbhai Jagani Vs. The ITO, Ward-1(1)(1) (HUF) Rajkot. Block No.1001, Rajdhani Apartment Opp: Purhkardham, University Road Rajkot 360 005. PAN : AAGHJ 5696 F (Appellant) (Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Mehul Ranpura, ld.AR राज"व क" ओर से/Revenue by : Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, ld.Sr.DR सुनवाई क" तार"ख /Date of Hearing : 12/03/2025 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date of Pronouncement : 04/06/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per, Dr. A. L. Saini, AM…

SHRI BHAVESH BHUVA,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3(3)(1), SURAT

In the result, ground No. 2(i) of the appeal is allowed

ITA 235/SRT/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat29 May 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Pawan Singhआ.अ.सं./Ita No.235/Srt/2022 (Ay 2012-13) (Hearing In Physical Court) Bhavesh Bhuva Income Tax Officer, C-51, Khodiyar Nagar Ward-3(3)(1), Surat, Income Vs Society, Nr. Chikoo Tax Office, Aaykar Bhavan, Wadi, Nana Varachha, Anavil Business Centre, Surat-395006 Hazira Road, Adajan, Pan No: Antpb 8989 P Surat-395007 अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ" /Respondent "नधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By Ms. Chaitali Shah, Ca राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing 25.05.2023 उ"घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of 29.05.2023 Pronouncement Order Under Section 254(1) Of Income Tax Act Per Pawan Singh: 1. This Appeal By Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [For Short To As “Nfac/Ld. Cit(A)”] Dated 10.06.2022 For Assessment Year 2012-13, Which In Turn Arises From The Addition Made By The Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(3)(1), Surat / Assessing Officer In Assessment Order Passed Under Section 143(3) R.W.S.147 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Act’) Dated 26.11.2019. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:- Bhavesh Bhuva “1. On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case, The Learned Cit(A), Nfac Has Grossly Erred In Passing The Impugned Appellate Order On An Ex-Parte Basis, By Erroneously Holding That The Appellant Is Not Interested In Pursuing The Appeal, When The Fact Is That The Appellant Has Made Detailed Submissions In Form No.35 Itself, Which Ought To Have Been Considered By The Learned Cit(A), Nfac While Passing The Impugned Order. Therefore, The Appellate Order Of The Learned Cit(A), Nfac Being Passed On An Ex-Parte Basis, Needs To Be Quashed As Being Erroneous, Illegal & Bad-In-Law.

Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 254(1)Section 69

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, सुरत "यायपीठ, सुरत IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, SURAT “SMC” BENCH, SURAT BEFORE SHRI PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER आ.अ.सं./ITA No.235/SRT/2022 (AY 2012-13) (Hearing in Physical Court) Bhavesh Bhuva Income Tax Officer, C-51, Khodiyar Nagar Ward-3(3)(1), Surat, Income Vs Society, Nr. Chikoo Tax Office, Aaykar Bhavan, Wadi, Nana Varachha, Anavil Business Centre, Surat-395006 Hazira Road, Adajan, PAN No: ANTPB 8989 P Surat-395007 अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ" /Respondent "नधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee by Ms. Chaitali Shah, CA राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue by Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr-DR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date…

Om Parkash Nahar v. Income-tax Officer (135 Taxmann.com 377) — Cited in 11 Judgments | BharatTax