SH. NARENDRA KUMAR AGARWAL,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI
In the result, the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed
ITA 4107/DEL/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Oct 2017AY 2009-10
Bench: Sh. N.K.Saini & Sh.K.N.Charynarendra Kumar Agarwal, Vs Dcit, 5, Central Avenue, Central Circle-12, 1St Floor, Maharani Bagh, New Delhi-110055. New Delhi-110065. Pan-Adepa3716G (Appellant) (Respondent) Kishore Kumar Agarwal, Vs Dcit, B-308, New Friends Colony, Central Circle-12, New Delhi-110065. New Delhi-110055. Pan-Afipa5132Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Hemant Kumar Agarwal, Vs Dcit, 70, Nehru Nagar, Agra. Central Circle-12, Pan-Abhpa9867D New Delhi-110055. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Sh. Pankaj Garg, Adv. Respondent By M/S. Shefali Swroop, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 14.09.2017 Date Of Pronouncement .09.2017 Order Per K.N.Charyall These Three Appeals Relating To Ay 2009-10 Are Filed Challenging The Orders Dated 19.05.2014 In The Cases Of Three Different Assessees Covered By The Search Operations Carried Out In Rajdarbar Group Of Cases On 31.07.2008. Facts Are
Section 271A
…nder made and was accepted by the AO without raising any queries, penalty u/s 271AAA is not justified. Further, reliance was placed on CIT vs Sudhir Jain [2014] 41 Taxmann.com 234 (Delhi High COurt); Neerat SInghal vs ACIT, Central Circle, New Delhi [2013] 37 Taxmann.com 189 (ITAT, Delhi); Pramod Kumar Jain vs DCIT [2013] 33 Taxmann.com 651 (ITAT, Cuttack); ACIT, Central Circle vs Munish Kumar Goyal [2014] 45 Taxmann.com 563 (ITAT, pg. 3 ITA No.4107- 4109/Del/2015 Chandigarh); and ACIT vs A.N.Annamalaisamy (HUF) [2013] 38 Taxmann.com 440 (ITAT, Chennai) for the principle that where the assessee having su…