Monoj Jain v. Union of India

134 Taxmann.com 173High Court2022#9391 most cited
11

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2024 to 2025.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Monoj Jain v. Union of India

URMILA GARG,HOWRAH vs. ITO, WARD 47(1),, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1734/KOL/2025[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Dec 2025AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubeyassessment Year: 2013-14 Urmila Garg…………………………..………………….……….……….……Appellant Flat No.402, 138 Block-A, 4Th Floor, Gt Road, Howrah - 711102.. [Pan: Adapg1577B] Vs. Ito, Ward-47(1), Kolkata..…………...…………………….....……...…..…..Respondent Appearances By: Shri Miraj D Shah, Ar, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri S. B. Chakraborthy, Addl. Cit, Sr. Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : December 03, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : December 10, 2025 Order Per Pradip Kumar Choubey: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 06.06.2025 Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’).

Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 250

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, कोलकाता पीठ, कोलकाता IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH KOLKATA Before Shri Rajesh Kumar, Accountant Member and Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Judicial Member Assessment Year: 2013-14 Urmila Garg…………………………..………………….……….……….……Appellant Flat No.402, 138 Block-A, 4th Floor, GT Road, Howrah - 711102.. [PAN: ADAPG1577B] vs. ITO, Ward-47(1), Kolkata..…………...…………………….....……...…..…..Respondent Appearances by: Shri Miraj D Shah, AR, appeared on behalf of the appellant. Shri S. B. Chakraborthy, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR, appeared on behalf of the Respondent. Date of concluding the hearing : December 03…

MANORAMA PATWA,HOWRAH vs. I.T.O., WARD - 47(1), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 493/KOL/2025[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata24 Oct 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubeyshri Rakesh Mishra & Assessment Year: 2015-16 Manorama Patwa…..………….……………………….……….……….……Appellant Shree Shyam Garden – 5Gh, 12, Haradutta Ray Chamaria Road, Howrah-711101.. [Pan: Aunpp4730F] Vs. Ito, Ward-47(1), Kolkata….……………………………….....……...…..…..Respondent Appearances By: Shri A. Kochar, Ar, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Arun Kr. Meena, Addl. Cit-Sr. Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : October 21, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : October 24, 2025 Order Per Pradip Kumar Choubey: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 04.02.2025 Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’).

Section 144Section 148Section 148ASection 250Section 68

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, कोलकाता पीठ, कोलकाता IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH KOLKATA Before Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Judicial Member Shri Rakesh Mishra, Accountant Member and Assessment Year: 2015-16 Manorama Patwa…..………….……………………….……….……….……Appellant Shree Shyam Garden – 5GH, 12, Haradutta Ray Chamaria Road, Howrah-711101.. [PAN: AUNPP4730F] vs. ITO, Ward-47(1), Kolkata….……………………………….....……...…..…..Respondent Appearances by: Shri A. Kochar, AR, appeared on behalf of the appellant. Shri Arun Kr. Meena, Addl. CIT-Sr. DR, appeared on behalf of the Respondent. Date of concluding the hearing : October 21…

PRAVEEN KUMAR PATWA HUF,HOWRAH vs. ITO, WARD-47(2), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed on this issue

ITA 1333/KOL/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Sept 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubeyआयकर अपील सं/Ita No.1333/Kol/2025 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2015-2016) Praveen Kumar Patwa Huf Vs Ito Ward-47 (2), Kolkata 12, Haradutta Ray Chamaria Rd Howrah, West Bengal-711101 Pan No. :Aajhp 7673 K (अपीलधर्थी /Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) .. निर्धाररती की ओर से /Assessee By Shri Anil Kochar, Advocate रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri S.B.Chakraborthy, Sr. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 01/09/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 04/09/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm : The Assessee Has Filed The Instant Appeal Against The Order Dated 23.05.2025, Passed By The Ld.Cit(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi For The Assessment Year 2015-2016. 2. The Sole Issue Involved In The Present Appeal Of The Assessee Is With Regard To Issuance Of Invalid Notice U/S.148 Of The Act Without Adhering To The New Inserted Provisions Of Section 148 R.W.S.148A Of The Act. 3. Ld. Ar Before Us Submitted That In This Case The Ao Has Framed The Assessment U/S.147 R.W.S.144 Of The Act Assessing The Total Income Of The Assessee At Rs.59,77,593/- Thereby Making Addition U/S.68 Of The Act At Rs.36,09,222/- & Addition Made U/S.69C Of The Act At Rs.1,80,461/-. In Appeal, The Ld.Cit(A) Dismissed The Appeal Of The Assessee. It Has Also Been Submitted By The Ld.Ar That Both The Authorities Below Have Erred In Not Considering The Fact That The Notice Issued U/S.148 Of The Act Is Invalid & Bad In Law As The Notice In This Case Has Been Issued On 01.04.2021

For Respondent: Shri S.B.Chakraborthy, Sr. DR
Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 68Section 69C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, KOLKATA BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं/ITA No.1333/KOL/2025 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2015-2016) Praveen Kumar Patwa HUF Vs ITO Ward-47 (2), Kolkata 12, Haradutta Ray Chamaria Rd Howrah, West Bengal-711101 PAN No. :AAJHP 7673 K (अपीलधर्थी /Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) .. निर्धाररती की ओर से /Assessee by Shri Anil Kochar, Advocate रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue by : Shri S.B.Chakraborthy, Sr. DR सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing : 01/09/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 04/0…

Monoj Jain v. Union of India (134 Taxmann.com 173) — Cited in 11 Judgments | BharatTax