NIRLEX SPARES PVT. LTD. vs. COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE
C.A. No.-005204-005204 - 2001Supreme Court04 Jan 2008
For Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE
…hat the brand name used on the corrugated boxes would not show any intention of indicating a connection between the goods manufactured by the appellant and the Marketing Company. Again, in Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Grasim Industries Ltd. [(2005) 4 SCC 194], this court, while considering similar provisions of the Notification No. 5/98-CE, observed in paragraphs 15 and 16 as under: - \023In our view, the Tribunal has completely misdirected itself. The term \023brand name or trade name\024 is qualified by the words \023that is to say\024. Thus, even though under normal circumstances a brand name…